Construction and Validation of Newly Developed Triangle Test of Reactive Agility in School Children

Q4 Social Sciences Studia Sportiva Pub Date : 2023-02-24 DOI:10.5817/sts2022-2-14
Vladimir Pavlinović
{"title":"Construction and Validation of Newly Developed Triangle Test of Reactive Agility in School Children","authors":"Vladimir Pavlinović","doi":"10.5817/sts2022-2-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE: Agility is described as a rapid whole-body movement with change of velocity or direction in response to the different stimuli. Scientific research identified two independent types of agility performances: pre-planned agility (CODS) and non-planned agility (RAG). CODS represent generic movement patterns. They can mimic the demands of a sport but all of the movements are pre-planned. In CODS there is no response to a stimulus like in RAG where movements are in response to cues such as the movements of the ball or actions of the opposition players. Literature review show lack of studies that assessed CODS and RAG in children, most probably due insufficiency in quality testing protocols. Hence, the purpose of this study was construction and validation of newly developed agility test that measures RAG performances in children. METHODS: For this purpose, the Blaze Pod system (BP) was used. Three lighting pods were mounted on three 50 cm cones in triangle formation with 4,5 meters distance between cones (TRGA). Results were collected via BP app. Four movement patterns were used to test RAG. Start and finish of the tests were conducted with the tap on BP pods. The sample comprised of 80 elementary school children (boys; n=39, age=14.88±0.36 yrs, height=174,3±7,46 cm, mass 67,86±16,78 kg, and girls; n=41, age=14.85±0.31 yrs, height=167.49±5.72 cm, mass=59.34±10.54 kg). Statistical analysis included calculation of normality of distribution, reliability coefficients, correlations and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Tests showed acceptable reliability with CA=0.58, ICC=0.32 for boys and CA=0.78, ICC=0.55 for girls. Inter-item correlations were higher in girls’ sample (r=0.49-0.64) than in boys (r=0.27-0.41). Also, test showed good sensitivity, normal data distribution and good homogeneity with no differences between items (boys; F=0.07, p=0.93; girls; F=0.13, p=0.88). Better reliability of TRAG test for girls is most probably caused by gender morphological differences. Namely, we observed greater standard deviations (SD) of height (BH) and mass (BM) in boys (boys; BH=7.37, BM=16.97; girls; BH=5.68, BM=9.7) and scientific research confirmed negative influence of BM and BH on reactive agility performance. CONCLUSION: Altogether, newly constructed TRGA test seems to be reliable instrument for measuring reactive agility in pubescent boys and girls.    \nKeywords: non-planned agility, metric characteristics, pubescents, gender","PeriodicalId":36179,"journal":{"name":"Studia Sportiva","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Sportiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/sts2022-2-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE: Agility is described as a rapid whole-body movement with change of velocity or direction in response to the different stimuli. Scientific research identified two independent types of agility performances: pre-planned agility (CODS) and non-planned agility (RAG). CODS represent generic movement patterns. They can mimic the demands of a sport but all of the movements are pre-planned. In CODS there is no response to a stimulus like in RAG where movements are in response to cues such as the movements of the ball or actions of the opposition players. Literature review show lack of studies that assessed CODS and RAG in children, most probably due insufficiency in quality testing protocols. Hence, the purpose of this study was construction and validation of newly developed agility test that measures RAG performances in children. METHODS: For this purpose, the Blaze Pod system (BP) was used. Three lighting pods were mounted on three 50 cm cones in triangle formation with 4,5 meters distance between cones (TRGA). Results were collected via BP app. Four movement patterns were used to test RAG. Start and finish of the tests were conducted with the tap on BP pods. The sample comprised of 80 elementary school children (boys; n=39, age=14.88±0.36 yrs, height=174,3±7,46 cm, mass 67,86±16,78 kg, and girls; n=41, age=14.85±0.31 yrs, height=167.49±5.72 cm, mass=59.34±10.54 kg). Statistical analysis included calculation of normality of distribution, reliability coefficients, correlations and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Tests showed acceptable reliability with CA=0.58, ICC=0.32 for boys and CA=0.78, ICC=0.55 for girls. Inter-item correlations were higher in girls’ sample (r=0.49-0.64) than in boys (r=0.27-0.41). Also, test showed good sensitivity, normal data distribution and good homogeneity with no differences between items (boys; F=0.07, p=0.93; girls; F=0.13, p=0.88). Better reliability of TRAG test for girls is most probably caused by gender morphological differences. Namely, we observed greater standard deviations (SD) of height (BH) and mass (BM) in boys (boys; BH=7.37, BM=16.97; girls; BH=5.68, BM=9.7) and scientific research confirmed negative influence of BM and BH on reactive agility performance. CONCLUSION: Altogether, newly constructed TRGA test seems to be reliable instrument for measuring reactive agility in pubescent boys and girls.    Keywords: non-planned agility, metric characteristics, pubescents, gender
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新开发的学龄儿童反应敏捷性三角测验的构建与验证
敏捷被描述为一种快速的全身运动,对不同的刺激会改变速度或方向。科学研究确定了两种独立类型的敏捷性表现:预先计划的敏捷性(CODS)和非计划的敏捷度(RAG)。CODS代表一般的运动模式。他们可以模仿一项运动的要求,但所有的动作都是预先计划好的。在CODS中,没有对刺激的反应,就像在RAG中,运动是对诸如球的运动或对手球员的动作之类的线索的反应。文献综述显示,缺乏评估儿童CODS和RAG的研究,很可能是由于质量检测方案不足。因此,本研究的目的是构建和验证新开发的敏捷性测试,该测试测量儿童的RAG表现。方法:为此目的,使用Blaze Pod系统(BP)。三个照明吊舱安装在三个50厘米的锥体上,锥体之间的距离为4.5米,呈三角形(TRGA)。结果通过BP应用程序收集。使用四种运动模式来测试RAG。测试的开始和结束都是在BP吊舱上进行的。样本包括80名小学生(男孩;n=39,年龄=14.88±0.36岁,身高=174,3±7.46厘米,质量67,86±16.78公斤;女孩;n=41,年龄=114.85±0.31岁,身高167.49±5.72厘米,质量59.34±10.54公斤)。统计分析包括正态分布计算、信度系数、相关性和方差分析。结果:测试显示出可接受的可靠性,男孩的CA=0.58,ICC=0.32,女孩的CA=0.78,ICC=0.55。女孩样本的项目间相关性(r=0.49-0.64)高于男孩(r=0.27-0.41)。此外,测试显示出良好的敏感性、正态数据分布和良好的同质性,项目之间没有差异(男孩;F=0.07,p=0.93;女孩;F=0.13,p=0.88)。女孩TRAG测试的更好可靠性很可能是由性别形态差异引起的。也就是说,我们观察到男孩(男孩;BH=7.37,BM=16.97;女孩;BH=5.68,BM=9.7)的身高(BH)和体重(BM)的标准差(SD)更大,科学研究证实了BM和BH对反应敏捷性能的负面影响。结论:总之,新构建的TRGA测试似乎是衡量青春期男孩和女孩反应敏捷性的可靠工具。关键词:非计划敏捷性,度量特征,青春期,性别
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Sportiva
Studia Sportiva Business, Management and Accounting-Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Regional Disparities Among Teams in Selected Countries with a Focus on Age Variations Examining Diversity and Team Satisfaction: A Quantitative Analysis in Czech Urban and Rural Contexts Kiteboarding Injuries Aerobic Endurance - Finding Optimal Rowing Ergometer Settings to Match Physiological Demands of Running Analysis of University Students' Perspectives on Physical Activity and Mandatory Physical Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1