{"title":"What is meant by ‘community’ in different theoretical traditions? An analysis of influential educational research","authors":"Eleni Patoulioti, C. Nilholm","doi":"10.1080/08856257.2023.2172892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Research on inclusive education often derives from a broader understanding of inclusion, namely as a radical change in schooling. Within this strand of research, several authors in the field have envisioned this change to be materialised in the image of schools and classrooms as communities with various characteristics where differences are seen as resources. Nevertheless, the word ‘community’ can carry a variety of meanings, especially when used in the field of education in which multiple theoretical traditions co-exist. The aim of this paper is to provide an analysis of the meanings of the word ‘community’ throughout influential educational research and in relation to the different theoretical traditions that inform it. The meanings are analysed through a reading of the 50 most highly cited educational research papers in the database Web of Science that are concerned with communities in schools and classrooms. Through a thematic analysis of the definitions and descriptions of community in the sample, four metaphors were identified – community as Idealised-Home, Idealised-Academia, Idealised-Polis, and Power-Resisting Space. These meanings are discussed in relation to the theoretical traditions discerned and their implicit societal purposes. Moreover, implications of the review for research on inclusive education are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47639,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Special Needs Education","volume":"38 1","pages":"751 - 765"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Special Needs Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2023.2172892","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT Research on inclusive education often derives from a broader understanding of inclusion, namely as a radical change in schooling. Within this strand of research, several authors in the field have envisioned this change to be materialised in the image of schools and classrooms as communities with various characteristics where differences are seen as resources. Nevertheless, the word ‘community’ can carry a variety of meanings, especially when used in the field of education in which multiple theoretical traditions co-exist. The aim of this paper is to provide an analysis of the meanings of the word ‘community’ throughout influential educational research and in relation to the different theoretical traditions that inform it. The meanings are analysed through a reading of the 50 most highly cited educational research papers in the database Web of Science that are concerned with communities in schools and classrooms. Through a thematic analysis of the definitions and descriptions of community in the sample, four metaphors were identified – community as Idealised-Home, Idealised-Academia, Idealised-Polis, and Power-Resisting Space. These meanings are discussed in relation to the theoretical traditions discerned and their implicit societal purposes. Moreover, implications of the review for research on inclusive education are discussed.
摘要:对包容性教育的研究往往源于对包容性的更广泛理解,即对学校教育的根本改变。在这一系列研究中,该领域的几位作者设想,这种变化将以学校和教室的形象体现出来,学校和教室是具有各种特征的社区,差异被视为资源。尽管如此,“社区”一词可以有多种含义,尤其是在多种理论传统共存的教育领域。本文的目的是分析“社区”一词在整个有影响力的教育研究中的含义,以及与之相关的不同理论传统。这些含义是通过阅读数据库Web of Science中50篇被引用率最高的教育研究论文来分析的,这些论文与学校和课堂上的社区有关。通过对样本中社区的定义和描述进行主题分析,确定了四个隐喻——社区,即理想化的家、理想化的学院、理想的波利斯和权力抵抗空间。这些意义是结合所辨别的理论传统及其隐含的社会目的来讨论的。此外,还讨论了该综述对包容性教育研究的影响。
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Special Needs Education reflects the dynamic growth of the theory and practice of special needs education as it is emerging worldwide. Written for teachers and researchers it provides a forum for reporting and reviewing scholarly research and significant developments in the field of special educational needs.