Screening Dominance: A Comparison of Noisy Signals

IF 2.2 2区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS American Economic Journal-Microeconomics Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1257/mic.20200284
David Lagziel, E. Lehrer
{"title":"Screening Dominance: A Comparison of Noisy Signals","authors":"David Lagziel, E. Lehrer","doi":"10.1257/mic.20200284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper studies the impact of noisy signals on screening processes. It deals with a decision problem in which a decision-maker screens a set of elements based on noisy unbiased evaluations. Given that the decision-maker uses threshold strategies, we show that additional binary noise can potentially improve a screening, an effect that resembles a “ lucky coin toss.” We compare different noisy signals under threshold strategies and optimal ones, and we provide several characterizations of cases in which one noise is preferable over another. Accordingly so, we establish a novel method to compare noise variables using a contraction mapping between percentiles. (JEL D82)","PeriodicalId":47467,"journal":{"name":"American Economic Journal-Microeconomics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Economic Journal-Microeconomics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20200284","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper studies the impact of noisy signals on screening processes. It deals with a decision problem in which a decision-maker screens a set of elements based on noisy unbiased evaluations. Given that the decision-maker uses threshold strategies, we show that additional binary noise can potentially improve a screening, an effect that resembles a “ lucky coin toss.” We compare different noisy signals under threshold strategies and optimal ones, and we provide several characterizations of cases in which one noise is preferable over another. Accordingly so, we establish a novel method to compare noise variables using a contraction mapping between percentiles. (JEL D82)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
筛选优势:噪声信号的比较
本文研究了噪声信号对筛选过程的影响。它处理了一个决策问题,决策者根据有噪声的无偏评估筛选一组元素。考虑到决策者使用阈值策略,我们证明了额外的二进制噪声可以潜在地改善筛选,这种效果类似于“幸运硬币投掷”。我们比较了阈值策略和最优策略下的不同噪声信号,并提供了一种噪声优于另一种噪声的几种情况的特征。因此,我们建立了一种新的方法,使用百分位数之间的收缩映射来比较噪声变量。(JEL D82)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
86
期刊最新文献
Smaller Slices of a Growing Pie: The Effects of Entry in Platform Markets Using Team Discussions to Understand Behavior in Indefinitely Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma Games Slope Takers in Anonymous Markets Monopolistic Competition and Efficiency under Firm Heterogeneity and Nonadditive Preferences Front Matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1