Determinants of voluntary CSR reporting reliability – evidence from Canada

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Global Responsibility Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI:10.1108/jgr-03-2022-0031
Anne‐Marie Gosselin, Sylvie Berthelot
{"title":"Determinants of voluntary CSR reporting reliability – evidence from Canada","authors":"Anne‐Marie Gosselin, Sylvie Berthelot","doi":"10.1108/jgr-03-2022-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is twofold: to examine the reliability of voluntary corporate social responsibility reporting (CSRR) to determine whether users can rely on the information released by corporations and to examine the determinants of CSRR reliability in a voluntary context.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study analyses the information included in a sample of 190 standalone corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports issued by Canadian corporations listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange S&P/TSX Composite Index from 2016 to 2018.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results of this study show that CSR reports lack reliability. The determinants identified (image, corporate governance and financialisation) partially explain the quality of the information disclosed. As well, the results suggest that corporations may attempt to manipulate users’ perception through their disclosures.\n\n\nPractical implications\nTThis study provides a greater understanding of the current state of CSRR in a voluntary context. It offers further insights into the strategies corporations use to manage impressions through CSR disclosures.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThis study provides further empirical data as to current shortcomings of voluntary CSRR and the potential benefits of further regulation.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nFew studies have specifically focused on the reliability of CSRR and its determinants in a voluntary context.\n","PeriodicalId":45268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Responsibility","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Responsibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jgr-03-2022-0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is twofold: to examine the reliability of voluntary corporate social responsibility reporting (CSRR) to determine whether users can rely on the information released by corporations and to examine the determinants of CSRR reliability in a voluntary context. Design/methodology/approach This study analyses the information included in a sample of 190 standalone corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports issued by Canadian corporations listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange S&P/TSX Composite Index from 2016 to 2018. Findings The results of this study show that CSR reports lack reliability. The determinants identified (image, corporate governance and financialisation) partially explain the quality of the information disclosed. As well, the results suggest that corporations may attempt to manipulate users’ perception through their disclosures. Practical implications TThis study provides a greater understanding of the current state of CSRR in a voluntary context. It offers further insights into the strategies corporations use to manage impressions through CSR disclosures. Social implications This study provides further empirical data as to current shortcomings of voluntary CSRR and the potential benefits of further regulation. Originality/value Few studies have specifically focused on the reliability of CSRR and its determinants in a voluntary context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自愿CSR报告可靠性的决定因素——来自加拿大的证据
目的本研究的目的有两个:检验自愿企业社会责任报告(CSRR)的可靠性,以确定用户是否可以依赖企业发布的信息,并在自愿背景下检验CSRR可靠性的决定因素。设计/方法/方法本研究分析了2016年至2018年在多伦多证券交易所标准普尔/多伦多证券交易所综合指数上市的加拿大公司发布的190份独立企业社会责任报告中包含的信息。确定的决定因素(形象、公司治理和财务化)部分解释了披露信息的质量。此外,研究结果表明,公司可能试图通过披露信息来操纵用户的感知。实际含义本研究提供了对自愿背景下CSRR现状的更多理解。它进一步深入了解了企业通过企业社会责任披露来管理印象的策略。社会含义这项研究提供了关于自愿CSRR目前的缺点和进一步监管的潜在好处的进一步的经验数据。原创性/价值很少有研究专门关注自愿背景下CSRR及其决定因素的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
18.80%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Impact of dividend policy on corporate social responsibility: the role of board governance mechanism Does tax disclosure in Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)-based sustainability reporting mitigate aggressive tax avoidance? Evidence from a developing country Corporate social responsibility and sustainable development goals: evidence from responsible business leaders Prestige over profit, corporate social responsibility boosts corporate sustainable performance: mediation roles of brand image and brand loyalty Social innovation in working management practices to support facilities management at Malaysian polytechnics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1