Reading the museum

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE Literature Compass Pub Date : 2023-05-26 DOI:10.1111/lic3.12709
Lindsey N. Chappell
{"title":"Reading the museum","authors":"Lindsey N. Chappell","doi":"10.1111/lic3.12709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The museum is not a neutral container, a passive collection of art and artifacts. Rather the museum is itself a historical argument, using objects and their relations to write our collective stories. This essay shows how the museum, as it developed within nineteenth-century European imperialism, directs meaning both within and beyond literature. The museum integrates readers into its collections and its narratives, directing them figuratively and literally through exhibits. Nineteenth-century literature, I argue, capitalizes on this dynamic interplay among the collection, the viewing subject, and the museum's ideologies. In both poetry and prose the museum appears as a <i>place</i>, a <i>concept</i>, and a <i>form</i>. For example, William Thackeray's “May Day Ode” shows how the Crystal Palace and the 1851 Great Exhibition facilitate an imperialist agenda. The galleries in Jane Austen's <i>Pride and Prejudice</i> and Charlotte Brontë’s <i>Villette</i>, meanwhile, are not just places the characters go; they also exert control over how characters (and readers) experience and evaluate collections. Across these texts, the museum is setting and theme. But, I argue, the museum also works as form, curating the collections, the characters who visit them, and the readers who access the narrative through museum logics. In conjunction with literary examples and an overview of scholarly conversations around nineteenth-century museum studies, I consider how the museum continues to direct bodies, interpretations, and ideas today by drawing on my experiences using museums in the college classroom.</p>","PeriodicalId":45243,"journal":{"name":"Literature Compass","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literature Compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lic3.12709","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The museum is not a neutral container, a passive collection of art and artifacts. Rather the museum is itself a historical argument, using objects and their relations to write our collective stories. This essay shows how the museum, as it developed within nineteenth-century European imperialism, directs meaning both within and beyond literature. The museum integrates readers into its collections and its narratives, directing them figuratively and literally through exhibits. Nineteenth-century literature, I argue, capitalizes on this dynamic interplay among the collection, the viewing subject, and the museum's ideologies. In both poetry and prose the museum appears as a place, a concept, and a form. For example, William Thackeray's “May Day Ode” shows how the Crystal Palace and the 1851 Great Exhibition facilitate an imperialist agenda. The galleries in Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice and Charlotte Brontë’s Villette, meanwhile, are not just places the characters go; they also exert control over how characters (and readers) experience and evaluate collections. Across these texts, the museum is setting and theme. But, I argue, the museum also works as form, curating the collections, the characters who visit them, and the readers who access the narrative through museum logics. In conjunction with literary examples and an overview of scholarly conversations around nineteenth-century museum studies, I consider how the museum continues to direct bodies, interpretations, and ideas today by drawing on my experiences using museums in the college classroom.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阅读博物馆
博物馆不是一个中立的容器,不是被动地收藏艺术品和文物。相反,博物馆本身就是一种历史论证,它利用物品及其关系来书写我们的集体故事。这篇文章展示了博物馆在十九世纪欧洲帝国主义的发展过程中,如何在文学内部和文学之外引导意义。博物馆将读者融入其藏品和叙事中,通过展品形象地和文字地引导读者。我认为,十九世纪文学利用了藏品、观赏主体和博物馆意识形态之间的这种动态互动。在诗歌和散文中,博物馆都是作为一个场所、一个概念和一种形式出现的。例如,威廉-萨克雷(William Thackeray)的 "五一节颂歌 "展示了水晶宫和 1851 年大博览会是如何促进帝国主义议程的。与此同时,简-奥斯汀的《傲慢与偏见》和夏洛蒂-勃朗特的《维莱特》中的美术馆不仅是人物去的地方,它们还控制着人物(和读者)如何体验和评价藏品。在这些文本中,博物馆既是背景,也是主题。但我认为,博物馆也是一种形式,它对藏品、参观藏品的人物以及通过博物馆逻辑进入叙事的读者进行策划。结合文学作品中的例子和围绕十九世纪博物馆研究的学术对话综述,我通过在大学课堂中使用博物馆的经验,思考博物馆如何继续引导当今的身体、解释和思想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Literature Compass
Literature Compass LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Chaucerian Theatricality: Then and Now Medievalism, Orientalism, and the Botany of the Holy Land Rehearsing Words and Gestures in Chaucer's Troilus and Criseyde Islamic Medievalism and Mobility in Mathias Énard's Street of Thieves Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1