The conundrum in smart city governance: Interoperability and compatibility in an ever-growing ecosystem of digital twins

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Data & policy Pub Date : 2023-02-28 DOI:10.1017/dap.2023.1
Hou Yee Quek, F. Sielker, J. Akroyd, A. Bhave, Aurel von Richthofen, P. Herthogs, C. Yamu, L. Wan, T. Nochta, G. Burgess, Mei Qi Lim, S. Mosbach, Markus Kraft
{"title":"The conundrum in smart city governance: Interoperability and compatibility in an ever-growing ecosystem of digital twins","authors":"Hou Yee Quek, F. Sielker, J. Akroyd, A. Bhave, Aurel von Richthofen, P. Herthogs, C. Yamu, L. Wan, T. Nochta, G. Burgess, Mei Qi Lim, S. Mosbach, Markus Kraft","doi":"10.1017/dap.2023.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Today, technological developments are ever-growing yet fragmented. Alongside inconsistent digital approaches and attitudes across city administrations, such developments have made it difficult to reap the benefits of city digital twins. Bringing together experiences from five research projects, this paper discusses these digital twins based on two digital integration methodologies—systems and semantic integration. We revisit the nature of the underlying technologies, and their implications for interoperability and compatibility in the context of planning processes and smart urbanism. Semantic approaches present a new opportunity for bidirectional data flows that can inform both governance processes and technological systems to co-create, cross-pollinate, and support optimal outcomes. Building on this opportunity, we suggest that considering the technological dimension as a new addition to the trifecta of economic, environmental, and social sustainability goals that guide planning processes, can aid governments to address this conundrum of fragmentation, interoperability, and compatibility.","PeriodicalId":93427,"journal":{"name":"Data & policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data & policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2023.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Today, technological developments are ever-growing yet fragmented. Alongside inconsistent digital approaches and attitudes across city administrations, such developments have made it difficult to reap the benefits of city digital twins. Bringing together experiences from five research projects, this paper discusses these digital twins based on two digital integration methodologies—systems and semantic integration. We revisit the nature of the underlying technologies, and their implications for interoperability and compatibility in the context of planning processes and smart urbanism. Semantic approaches present a new opportunity for bidirectional data flows that can inform both governance processes and technological systems to co-create, cross-pollinate, and support optimal outcomes. Building on this opportunity, we suggest that considering the technological dimension as a new addition to the trifecta of economic, environmental, and social sustainability goals that guide planning processes, can aid governments to address this conundrum of fragmentation, interoperability, and compatibility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智慧城市治理的难题:不断增长的数字孪生生态系统中的互操作性和兼容性
摘要今天,技术发展是不断增长的,但又是分散的。除了城市管理部门不一致的数字方法和态度外,这些发展也使人们很难从城市数字双胞胎中获益。本文结合五个研究项目的经验,基于两种数字集成方法——系统集成和语义集成,讨论了这些数字双胞胎。我们重新审视了底层技术的性质,以及它们在规划过程和智能城市化背景下对互操作性和兼容性的影响。语义方法为双向数据流提供了一个新的机会,可以为治理过程和技术系统提供信息,以共同创造、交叉传播和支持最佳结果。在这个机会的基础上,我们建议,将技术层面视为指导规划过程的经济、环境和社会可持续性三大目标的新补充,可以帮助政府解决碎片化、互操作性和兼容性的难题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Determinants for university students’ location data sharing with public institutions during COVID-19: The Italian case Bus Rapid Transit: End of trend in Latin America? Accelerating and enhancing the generation of socioeconomic data to inform forced displacement policy and response “That is why users do not understand the maps we make for them”: Cartographic gaps between experts and domestic workers and the Right to the City Analysis of spatial–temporal validation patterns in Fortaleza’s public transport systems: a data mining approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1