The Emperor’s New Bookcloths: Friedrich Gottlieb Klopstock’s Presentation Copies for the Imperial Court

Carlos Spoerhase
{"title":"The Emperor’s New Bookcloths: Friedrich Gottlieb Klopstock’s Presentation Copies for the Imperial Court","authors":"Carlos Spoerhase","doi":"10.1163/15700690-12341444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis paper explores Klopstock’s presentation copies of his drama Hermanns Schlacht in the context of his efforts to gain favor with the imperial court in Vienna. It focuses in particular on Klopstock’s attention to the materiality of the presentation copies and his strategies to adjust to court protocol. In this vein, the essay highlights his dissatisfaction with the quality of German books in general, which he felt undermined his efforts to establish himself with his patrons. At the same time, Klopstock seized on the book’s materiality as an opening to reframe the relationship of author to patron. He envisioned a new kind of relationship, which would be more reciprocal. By trying to redefine the author’s position at court, Klopstock aimed to elevate the authorial role more generally. Klopstock’s leveraging of the material book to elevate the author was part of a wider eighteenth-century debate concerning the status of authors in their relation to patrons. Klopstock aimed not only to redefine this relationship as one of equals but also to commit the emperor to provide recognition and financial support for German writers, thus securing the stature of German letters. In this context, Klopstock’s binding choices are shown to be bold moves through which he tried to break the cultural conventions attached to the medium of the presentation copy. Klopstock’s own designs of his presentation copies to the imperial court have to be seen as—ultimately failed—attempts to recalibrate cultural power structures.","PeriodicalId":41348,"journal":{"name":"Quaerendo-A Journal Devoted to Manuscripts and Printed Books","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/15700690-12341444","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaerendo-A Journal Devoted to Manuscripts and Printed Books","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700690-12341444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores Klopstock’s presentation copies of his drama Hermanns Schlacht in the context of his efforts to gain favor with the imperial court in Vienna. It focuses in particular on Klopstock’s attention to the materiality of the presentation copies and his strategies to adjust to court protocol. In this vein, the essay highlights his dissatisfaction with the quality of German books in general, which he felt undermined his efforts to establish himself with his patrons. At the same time, Klopstock seized on the book’s materiality as an opening to reframe the relationship of author to patron. He envisioned a new kind of relationship, which would be more reciprocal. By trying to redefine the author’s position at court, Klopstock aimed to elevate the authorial role more generally. Klopstock’s leveraging of the material book to elevate the author was part of a wider eighteenth-century debate concerning the status of authors in their relation to patrons. Klopstock aimed not only to redefine this relationship as one of equals but also to commit the emperor to provide recognition and financial support for German writers, thus securing the stature of German letters. In this context, Klopstock’s binding choices are shown to be bold moves through which he tried to break the cultural conventions attached to the medium of the presentation copy. Klopstock’s own designs of his presentation copies to the imperial court have to be seen as—ultimately failed—attempts to recalibrate cultural power structures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
皇帝的新书布:弗里德里希·戈特利布·克洛普斯托克的宫廷展示副本
本文探讨了克洛普斯托克为赢得维也纳帝国宫廷的青睐而创作的戏剧《赫尔曼斯·施拉奇特》的复制品。它特别关注Klopstock对陈述副本的重要性的关注,以及他根据法庭协议进行调整的策略。本着这种精神,这篇文章强调了他对德国书籍总体质量的不满,他认为这削弱了他与赞助人建立关系的努力。与此同时,Klopstock抓住了这本书的实质性,以此为契机重新构建了作者与赞助人的关系。他设想了一种新的关系,这种关系将更加互惠。克洛普斯托克试图重新定义作者在法庭上的地位,旨在更普遍地提升作者的角色。Klopstock利用这本材料书来提升作者的地位,这是18世纪关于作者在与赞助人关系中的地位的更广泛辩论的一部分。克洛普斯托克的目的不仅是将这种关系重新定义为平等的关系,而且是让皇帝为德国作家提供认可和财政支持,从而确保德国信件的地位。在这种背景下,Klopstock的装订选择被证明是大胆的举措,他试图打破附在演示文稿副本媒介上的文化惯例。克洛普斯托克自己设计的向朝廷提交的演示文稿副本不得不被视为——最终失败了——试图重新校准文化权力结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Quærendo is a leading peer-reviewed journal in the world of manuscripts and books. It contains a selection of scholarly articles connected with the Low Countries. Particular emphasis is given to codicology and palaeography, printing from around 1500 until present times, humanism, book publishers and libraries, typography, bibliophily and book binding. Since 1971 Quærendo has been establishing itself as a forum for contributions from the Low Countries concerning the history of books. Its appearance in the great libraries of the world as well as on the book shelves of individual professors and scholars, shows it to be an invaluable reference work for their research.
期刊最新文献
The Translation of Johann Arndt’s True Christianity into Dutch and the Distribution of his Books in the Dutch Republic Poliziano Correcting Poliziano Sua fata The Export of Books from the Dutch Republic to the Southern Netherlands The Publishing Process of the First Series of Karl Marx’s Le Capital (February–October 1872)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1