Interrupting a joke validates thoughts and polarizes attitudes towards a recycling company / La interrupción de un chiste puede potenciar su efecto de validación del pensamiento y cambiar las actitudes hacia una empresa de reciclaje

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Revista De Psicologia Social Pub Date : 2018-07-29 DOI:10.1080/02134748.2018.1483623
David Santos, Maria Stavraki, Beatriz Gandarillas, Ana Cancela, Pablo Briñol
{"title":"Interrupting a joke validates thoughts and polarizes attitudes towards a recycling company / La interrupción de un chiste puede potenciar su efecto de validación del pensamiento y cambiar las actitudes hacia una empresa de reciclaje","authors":"David Santos, Maria Stavraki, Beatriz Gandarillas, Ana Cancela, Pablo Briñol","doi":"10.1080/02134748.2018.1483623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Positive emotions can validate either positive or negative thoughts. Previous research has demonstrated that people use their thoughts more when they recall past episodes of happiness and when they are induced to smile. This study was designed to evaluate whether a new induction of a happy mood (a joke) can influence thought use in response to a persuasive proposal. Two versions of the same joke were compared: a version that included an interruption before the punchline and another that did not include an interruption at that point. The aim was to examine whether this interruption increased or decreased the use of previously generated thoughts towards a persuasive communication. The results indicated that the participants who were interrupted before the punchline relied more on their own thoughts in forming their attitudes than did those who were in the control group. In consequence, an interruption during a pleasant experience (e.g., a joke) increased persuasion when thoughts were positive but decreased persuasion when thoughts were negative.","PeriodicalId":42024,"journal":{"name":"Revista De Psicologia Social","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02134748.2018.1483623","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista De Psicologia Social","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2018.1483623","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Positive emotions can validate either positive or negative thoughts. Previous research has demonstrated that people use their thoughts more when they recall past episodes of happiness and when they are induced to smile. This study was designed to evaluate whether a new induction of a happy mood (a joke) can influence thought use in response to a persuasive proposal. Two versions of the same joke were compared: a version that included an interruption before the punchline and another that did not include an interruption at that point. The aim was to examine whether this interruption increased or decreased the use of previously generated thoughts towards a persuasive communication. The results indicated that the participants who were interrupted before the punchline relied more on their own thoughts in forming their attitudes than did those who were in the control group. In consequence, an interruption during a pleasant experience (e.g., a joke) increased persuasion when thoughts were positive but decreased persuasion when thoughts were negative.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中断一个笑话可以验证对回收公司的想法和两极分化的态度/中断一个笑话可以增强其验证思想的效果,并改变对回收公司的态度
摘要积极的情绪可以验证积极或消极的想法。先前的研究表明,当人们回忆起过去的幸福时光和被诱导微笑时,他们会更多地使用自己的想法。这项研究旨在评估对快乐情绪(笑话)的新诱导是否会影响对有说服力的提议的思维使用。对同一个笑话的两个版本进行了比较:一个版本在笑点前包含中断,另一个版本不包含当时的中断。目的是检查这种中断是否增加或减少了先前产生的想法在说服性沟通中的使用。结果表明,与对照组相比,在笑点之前被打断的参与者在形成态度时更多地依赖于自己的想法。因此,在愉快的经历中(例如,笑话)的打断会在想法积极时增加说服力,但在想法消极时会降低说服力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista De Psicologia Social
Revista De Psicologia Social PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Where you come from matters: familial class background plays a greater role for status-related judgements in France than in the United States ( Tu procedencia importa: la clase social familiar de pertenencia tiene más peso en los juicios sobre el estatus social en Francia que en Estados Unidos ) Socio-economic inequalities of families and their differential impact on types of political participation in the new generation of 24 countries (Desigualdades socio-económicas familiares y su impacto diferencial sobre tipos de participación política de nuevas generaciones en 24 países) Introduction to the special issue: nuances of social class and socioeconomic status (Introducción a este monográfico: los matices del concepto de clase social y del nivel socioeconómico) Why do we vent our emotions and blame others during the coronavirus pandemic? The role of emotional clarity in the United States and South Korea (¿Por qué ventilamos nuestras emociones y culpabilizamos a otras personas durante la pandemia del coronavirus? El rol de la claridad emocional en los Estados Unidos y Corea del Sur) Enhancing social entrepreneurial intentions through outcome expectations, perceived social support and social entrepreneurial self-efficacy: the moderating effects of sustainability orientation (Mejora de las intenciones empresariales sociales a través de las expectativas de resultados, el apoyo social percibido, y la auto-eficacia empresarial social: los efectos moderadores de la orientación a la sostenibilidad)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1