Selected Quantitative Parameters Comparison of Apples from Bio- and Conventional Production

M. Ján, Serralegri Davide
{"title":"Selected Quantitative Parameters Comparison of Apples from Bio- and Conventional Production","authors":"M. Ján, Serralegri Davide","doi":"10.30958/AJS.5-4-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims of the research were to compare quantitative and qualitative parameters of apples from organic and conventional (integrated) production in following attributes: fruit weight, fruit diameter, juice yield, total sugar content, total acid content, fructose, glucose, malic acid, total soluble solids (TSS) and pH. A statistically significant difference between fruit diameter and fruit weight in organic and conventional system was observed, meanwhile in nutrition values just pH showed difference (p≤0.05) among all 11 varieties. According to measured parameters variety groups were created. The best variety for organic production was Kanzi, followed by Morgenduft, Red Delicious and Red Chief. For conventional production Fuji and Gala showed the highest performance followed by Braeburn, Golden Delicious and Pink Lady. Granny Smith and Envy can be used in both organic and conventional systems with medium performance.","PeriodicalId":91843,"journal":{"name":"Athens journal of sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Athens journal of sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30958/AJS.5-4-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aims of the research were to compare quantitative and qualitative parameters of apples from organic and conventional (integrated) production in following attributes: fruit weight, fruit diameter, juice yield, total sugar content, total acid content, fructose, glucose, malic acid, total soluble solids (TSS) and pH. A statistically significant difference between fruit diameter and fruit weight in organic and conventional system was observed, meanwhile in nutrition values just pH showed difference (p≤0.05) among all 11 varieties. According to measured parameters variety groups were created. The best variety for organic production was Kanzi, followed by Morgenduft, Red Delicious and Red Chief. For conventional production Fuji and Gala showed the highest performance followed by Braeburn, Golden Delicious and Pink Lady. Granny Smith and Envy can be used in both organic and conventional systems with medium performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物法和常规法生产苹果的定量参数选择比较
本研究的目的是比较有机和传统(综合)生产的苹果在以下属性上的定量和定性参数:果实重量、果实直径、果汁产量、总糖含量、总酸含量、果糖、葡萄糖、苹果酸、总可溶性固形物(TSS)和pH。在有机体系和常规体系中,果实直径和果实重量差异具有统计学意义,而在营养值方面,仅pH值就存在差异(p≤0.05)。根据测量的参数建立了各种组。有机生产的最佳品种是Kanzi,其次是Morgenduft、Red Delicious和Red Chief。在传统制作方面,富士和Gala的表现最高,其次是Braeburn、Golden Delicious和Pink Lady。Granny Smith和Envy可用于中等性能的有机和传统系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Growth of Crayfish, which Serves as an Indicator of Clean and Healthy Water Ecosystems in the Mediterranean Region Identifying Sustainability Efforts in Company’s Reports Using Text Mining and Machine Learning Generative Urban Design in the Field of Infrastructure: An Optimizing Solution for Connecting Fier and Vlora County by a 600 m Bridge over Selenica River, Albania Infrastructures of Large-Scale Geothermal Energy Projects in Kenya: Materialization, Generativity, and Socio-Economic Development Linkages An Analysis of Stream Flow and Flood Frequency: A Case Study from Downstream of Kelani River Basin, Sri Lanka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1