The growth of organisational professionals in tertiary educational institutions in New Zealand

K. Löfgren, Ben Darrah-Morgan, Patrik Hall
{"title":"The growth of organisational professionals in tertiary educational institutions in New Zealand","authors":"K. Löfgren, Ben Darrah-Morgan, Patrik Hall","doi":"10.1108/ijpsm-09-2021-0222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this article is to ascertain empirically to what extent we can quantify an occupational shift, where a new type of bureaucracy of organisational professionals is on the rise in tertiary educational institutions in New Zealand. Furthermore, the objective is also to present accountability as the prime factor behind the changes.Design/methodology/approachThe analytical strategy of the study takes a point of departure in the distinction between occupational and organisational professionals in the public sector in general, and more specifically in tertiary education (TE). Based on these new categorisations, the authors have used various descriptive historical statistics (both national and institutional) to estimate changes over time.FindingsThe article finds, in line with some international research, that there has been a comparatively higher growth of organisational professionals in TE in New Zealand, and a significantly higher growth than in the private sector and in the overall public services. The authors hypothesise that this growth can be associated with accountability (both vertical and horizontal) as the dominant notion in TE.Originality/valueThis article takes a different approach than the existing literature on administrative intensity in TE by looking at occupational changes rather than changes in institutions budgets. This article also confirms some of the findings in the growing international literature on changes in professional roles.","PeriodicalId":47437,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Sector Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Sector Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpsm-09-2021-0222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this article is to ascertain empirically to what extent we can quantify an occupational shift, where a new type of bureaucracy of organisational professionals is on the rise in tertiary educational institutions in New Zealand. Furthermore, the objective is also to present accountability as the prime factor behind the changes.Design/methodology/approachThe analytical strategy of the study takes a point of departure in the distinction between occupational and organisational professionals in the public sector in general, and more specifically in tertiary education (TE). Based on these new categorisations, the authors have used various descriptive historical statistics (both national and institutional) to estimate changes over time.FindingsThe article finds, in line with some international research, that there has been a comparatively higher growth of organisational professionals in TE in New Zealand, and a significantly higher growth than in the private sector and in the overall public services. The authors hypothesise that this growth can be associated with accountability (both vertical and horizontal) as the dominant notion in TE.Originality/valueThis article takes a different approach than the existing literature on administrative intensity in TE by looking at occupational changes rather than changes in institutions budgets. This article also confirms some of the findings in the growing international literature on changes in professional roles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新西兰高等教育机构组织专业人员的成长
目的本文的目的是从经验上确定我们可以在多大程度上量化职业转变,在新西兰高等教育机构中,一种新型的组织专业人员官僚作风正在兴起。此外,目标也是将问责制作为变革背后的主要因素。设计/方法/方法本研究的分析策略以区分公共部门的职业和组织专业人员为出发点,更具体地说,是高等教育(TE)。基于这些新的分类,作者使用了各种描述性历史统计数据(包括国家和机构统计数据)来估计一段时间内的变化。发现这篇文章发现,与一些国际研究一致,新西兰TE的组织专业人员增长相对较高,而且明显高于私营部门和整体公共服务的增长。作者假设,这种增长可能与问责制(纵向和横向)有关,问责制是TE中的主导概念。原始性/价值本文采用了与现有关于TE行政强度的文献不同的方法,着眼于职业变化,而不是机构预算的变化。这篇文章还证实了越来越多的国际文献中关于职业角色变化的一些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Public Sector Management (IJPSM) publishes academic articles on the management, governance, and reform of public sector organizations around the world, aiming to provide an accessible and valuable resource for academics and public managers alike. IJPSM covers the full range of public management research including studies of organizations, public finances, performance management, Human Resources Management, strategy, leadership, accountability, integrity, collaboration, e-government, procurement, and more. IJPSM encourages scholars to publish their empirical research and is particularly interested in comparative findings. IJPSM is open to articles using a variety of research methods and theoretical approaches.
期刊最新文献
Teleworking and work-family balance in public educational institutions Service satisfaction among a language minority: a randomized survey experiment on the satisfaction of Swedish-speaking Finns with early childhood education The effect of political environment on security and privacy of contact tracing apps evaluation The many roads to reform: a configurational analysis of the conditions supporting performance management implementation Blockchain for the circular economy, implications for public governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1