A Prospective Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Intraoperative Injection of Technetium Tc 99m Tilmanocept with Technetium Tc 99m Sulfur Colloid in Breast Cancer Lymphatic Mapping

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Breast Journal Pub Date : 2022-07-30 DOI:10.1155/2022/9421489
A. Ferez-Pinzon, Samuel L. Corey, Haresh Rochani, Elena A. Rehl, William E. Burak Jr
{"title":"A Prospective Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Intraoperative Injection of Technetium Tc 99m Tilmanocept with Technetium Tc 99m Sulfur Colloid in Breast Cancer Lymphatic Mapping","authors":"A. Ferez-Pinzon, Samuel L. Corey, Haresh Rochani, Elena A. Rehl, William E. Burak Jr","doi":"10.1155/2022/9421489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Technetium-labeled sulfur colloid (TSC) is a radiolabeled mapping agent commonly used for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNBx). Tilmanocept, a CD206 receptor-targeted mapping agent, has gained recent popularity due to potential advantages of rapid and quick uptake to the SLNs. The objectives of this study were to assess (1) the difference in the number of SLNs harvested using tilmanocept versus TSC and (2) the difference in time to transcutaneous localization when using an intraoperative injection approach. Methods. Patients undergoing breast conservation and SLNBx were consented and randomized to receive either 0.5 mCi of filtered TSC or 0.5 mCi of tilmanocept injected intradermally immediately after induction of anesthesia. Axillary transcutaneous gamma detector probe counts were taken at 1-minute intervals until a hot spot was identified. SLNs were then identified and excised. Additional nodes were excised if their counts per second (cps) were greater than 10% of the cps of the hottest SLN. The number of SLNs was based on both number of nodes collected intraoperatively and the number recorded in the final pathology report. Results. The study population consisted of 86 patients, 48 randomized to tilmanocept and 38 to TSC. There were no significant differences in patient or tumor characteristics between the two groups. Localization rates were 100% for both cohorts. The mean number of SLNs identified and removed was not significantly different (\n \n p\n =\n 0.34\n \n , intraoperatively; \n \n p\n =\n 0.57\n \n , pathology reported). Time to transcutaneous localization was 3.3 ± 2.0 minutes for tilmanocept and 3.9 ± 2.3 minutes for TSC (\n \n p\n =\n 0.19\n \n ). The average cps for the hottest node was 2,180.0 ± 2,460.5 in the tilmanocept group compared to 2,679.3 ± 2,687.5 in the TSC group (\n \n p\n =\n 0.94\n \n ). Conclusion. There was no significant difference in the number of SLNs harvested or in the time to transcutaneous localization when using tilmanocept versus TSC as the radiolabeled mapping agents for intraoperative injection and mapping. Either agent can be used without any significant difference in performance.","PeriodicalId":56326,"journal":{"name":"Breast Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9421489","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Introduction. Technetium-labeled sulfur colloid (TSC) is a radiolabeled mapping agent commonly used for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNBx). Tilmanocept, a CD206 receptor-targeted mapping agent, has gained recent popularity due to potential advantages of rapid and quick uptake to the SLNs. The objectives of this study were to assess (1) the difference in the number of SLNs harvested using tilmanocept versus TSC and (2) the difference in time to transcutaneous localization when using an intraoperative injection approach. Methods. Patients undergoing breast conservation and SLNBx were consented and randomized to receive either 0.5 mCi of filtered TSC or 0.5 mCi of tilmanocept injected intradermally immediately after induction of anesthesia. Axillary transcutaneous gamma detector probe counts were taken at 1-minute intervals until a hot spot was identified. SLNs were then identified and excised. Additional nodes were excised if their counts per second (cps) were greater than 10% of the cps of the hottest SLN. The number of SLNs was based on both number of nodes collected intraoperatively and the number recorded in the final pathology report. Results. The study population consisted of 86 patients, 48 randomized to tilmanocept and 38 to TSC. There were no significant differences in patient or tumor characteristics between the two groups. Localization rates were 100% for both cohorts. The mean number of SLNs identified and removed was not significantly different ( p = 0.34 , intraoperatively; p = 0.57 , pathology reported). Time to transcutaneous localization was 3.3 ± 2.0 minutes for tilmanocept and 3.9 ± 2.3 minutes for TSC ( p = 0.19 ). The average cps for the hottest node was 2,180.0 ± 2,460.5 in the tilmanocept group compared to 2,679.3 ± 2,687.5 in the TSC group ( p = 0.94 ). Conclusion. There was no significant difference in the number of SLNs harvested or in the time to transcutaneous localization when using tilmanocept versus TSC as the radiolabeled mapping agents for intraoperative injection and mapping. Either agent can be used without any significant difference in performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项前瞻性双盲随机对照试验,比较术中注射锝Tc 99m Tilmanocept与锝Tc 99m硫胶体在乳腺癌淋巴标测中的作用
介绍锝标记硫胶体(TSC)是一种放射性标记的标测剂,常用于前哨淋巴结活检(SLNBx)。替马西普是一种CD206受体靶向的标测剂,由于其对SLNs的快速吸收的潜在优势,最近受到了欢迎。本研究的目的是评估(1)使用替马西普与TSC采集的SLN数量的差异,以及(2)使用术中注射方法时经皮定位时间的差异。方法。接受保乳和SLNBx的患者同意并随机接受0.5 过滤TSC的mCi或0.5 在麻醉诱导后立即皮内注射替马西普的mCi。每隔1分钟对腋窝经皮伽马探测器探头进行计数,直到发现热点。然后鉴定并切除SLN。如果它们的每秒计数(cps)大于最热SLN的cps的10%,则切除额外的节点。SLN的数量基于术中收集的淋巴结数量和最终病理报告中记录的数量。后果研究人群包括86名患者,其中48名随机接受替马西普治疗,38名随机接受TSC治疗。两组患者或肿瘤特征无显著差异。两组患者的本地化率均为100%。识别和切除的SLN的平均数量没有显著差异(p=0.34,术中;p=0.57,病理报告)。经皮定位时间为3.3 ± 替马西普2.0分钟,3.9分钟 ± TSC为2.3分钟(p=0.19)。最热节点的平均cps为2180.0 ± 替马西普组为2460.5,而替马西普组为2679.3 ± TSC组为2687.5(p=0.94)。结论当使用替马西普与TSC作为术中注射和标测的放射性标记标测剂时,收获的SLN数量或经皮定位时间没有显著差异。任何一种代理都可以在性能上没有任何显著差异的情况下使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Breast Journal
Breast Journal 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Breast Journal is the first comprehensive, multidisciplinary source devoted exclusively to all facets of research, diagnosis, and treatment of breast disease. The Breast Journal encompasses the latest news and technologies from the many medical specialties concerned with breast disease care in order to address the disease within the context of an integrated breast health care. This editorial philosophy recognizes the special social, sexual, and psychological considerations that distinguish cancer, and breast cancer in particular, from other serious diseases. Topics specifically within the scope of The Breast Journal include: Risk Factors Prevention Early Detection Diagnosis and Therapy Psychological Issues Quality of Life Biology of Breast Cancer.
期刊最新文献
Intramammary Tumor Location and Ipsilateral Lymphatic Spread in Early Breast Cancer Patients Using One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) Assay Relationship Between Mitochondrial Biological Function and Breast Cancer Unveiling miRNA30b’s Role in Suppressing ADAM12 to Combat Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Effect of Estrogen Receptor on the Relationship Between HER2 Immunohistochemistry Score and Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1