Worry about getting infected, confidence in safeguards, and received treatment between waves one and two of COVID-19 among patients with cancer in the Stockholm region

J. Winterling, Y. Wengström
{"title":"Worry about getting infected, confidence in safeguards, and received treatment between waves one and two of COVID-19 among patients with cancer in the Stockholm region","authors":"J. Winterling, Y. Wengström","doi":"10.1097/OR9.0000000000000078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: The Stockholm region was hard hit by the first wave of COVID-19, although, in contrast to other countries, Sweden introduced less strict protective measures. Furthermore, early studies highlighted the fact that patients with cancer were at increased risk of becoming seriously ill with COVID-19. The aim was to describe perceptions of risk, safeguards, and cancer treatment received among patients with cancer early in the COVID-19 pandemic and to investigate the relationship between these perceptions and undergoing active treatment, self-isolation, and psychological well-being. Methods: This observational cross-sectional study was based on the Swedish sample in a multinational study. Data were collected through an anonymous online questionnaire from a convenience sample of patients with cancer in the Stockholm region of Sweden between the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: Among participants (N = 76), 9% had been infected by COVID-19 and 62% had been self-isolating for a longer period; 41% of participants stated that they were worried about becoming infected, which was associated with self-isolation and higher levels of anxiety. The majority were confident that family members behaved with caution and followed COVID-19 guidelines, but few had confidence in other people or state authorities. Less than 15% reported that they did not receive medical treatment or supportive care. Conclusion: Despite the small sample size, this study shows that most participants used self-isolation to protect themselves from COVID-19 during this period and that most of the participants perceived that they had received their cancer treatment as planned.","PeriodicalId":73915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OR9.0000000000000078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: The Stockholm region was hard hit by the first wave of COVID-19, although, in contrast to other countries, Sweden introduced less strict protective measures. Furthermore, early studies highlighted the fact that patients with cancer were at increased risk of becoming seriously ill with COVID-19. The aim was to describe perceptions of risk, safeguards, and cancer treatment received among patients with cancer early in the COVID-19 pandemic and to investigate the relationship between these perceptions and undergoing active treatment, self-isolation, and psychological well-being. Methods: This observational cross-sectional study was based on the Swedish sample in a multinational study. Data were collected through an anonymous online questionnaire from a convenience sample of patients with cancer in the Stockholm region of Sweden between the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: Among participants (N = 76), 9% had been infected by COVID-19 and 62% had been self-isolating for a longer period; 41% of participants stated that they were worried about becoming infected, which was associated with self-isolation and higher levels of anxiety. The majority were confident that family members behaved with caution and followed COVID-19 guidelines, but few had confidence in other people or state authorities. Less than 15% reported that they did not receive medical treatment or supportive care. Conclusion: Despite the small sample size, this study shows that most participants used self-isolation to protect themselves from COVID-19 during this period and that most of the participants perceived that they had received their cancer treatment as planned.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯德哥尔摩地区癌症患者对感染的担忧、对保障措施的信心以及在新冠肺炎第一波和第二波之间接受治疗
摘要背景:斯德哥尔摩地区受到第一波新冠肺炎的严重打击,尽管与其他国家相比,瑞典采取了不太严格的防护措施。此外,早期研究强调,癌症患者患新冠肺炎重症的风险增加。目的是描述新冠肺炎大流行早期癌症患者对风险、保障措施和癌症治疗的看法,并调查这些看法与积极治疗、自我安慰和心理健康之间的关系。方法:这项观察性横断面研究基于一项跨国研究中的瑞典样本。数据是通过匿名在线问卷从新冠肺炎大流行第一波和第二波期间瑞典斯德哥尔摩地区癌症患者的便利样本中收集的。结果:在参与者中(N=76),9%的人感染了新冠肺炎,62%的人自我安慰时间更长;41%的参与者表示,他们担心被感染,这与自我隔离和更高程度的焦虑有关。大多数人相信家庭成员行为谨慎,遵守新冠肺炎指南,但很少有人对其他人或国家当局有信心。不到15%的人报告说,他们没有接受医疗或支持性护理。结论:尽管样本量很小,但这项研究表明,大多数参与者在这段时间内使用自我安慰来保护自己免受新冠肺炎的感染,并且大多数参与者认为他们已经按计划接受了癌症治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reflections on the contribution of IPOS to psycho-oncology Evaluation of frailty, cognitive function, and age as prognostic factors for survival in patients with IDH1wild-type high-grade glioma Effects of a communication skills training program to improve capacity to engage in advance care planning in caregivers of patients with malignant gliomas. Survivors of child and adolescent cancer experiences of bullying at school or work: self-report and parent proxy report Family cancer caregiver use of and benefit from an internet-delivered insomnia intervention: results from a single-group feasibility trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1