Becoming Inner Kirghiz: Qing Policy Toward the Five Tribes in Xinjiang, 1750s–1790s

IF 0.6 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY LATE IMPERIAL CHINA Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1353/late.2023.a899674
Jaymin Kim
{"title":"Becoming Inner Kirghiz: Qing Policy Toward the Five Tribes in Xinjiang, 1750s–1790s","authors":"Jaymin Kim","doi":"10.1353/late.2023.a899674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The scholarship on Qing Xinjiang has not paid much attention to the Qing relationship with the Kirghiz. On one hand, the Kirghiz, decentralized and fragmented, escape the attention of scholars interested in Qing relations with Central Asian “polities.” On the other hand, historians of Altishahr consider the Kirghiz as nomadic outsiders, only mentioning them in passing when their paths cross those of the Altishahri. A careful examination of Manchu-language palace memorials from the Qingdai Xinjiang Manwen dang’an huibian, however, shows that there was a subgroup of Kirghiz who the Qianlong emperor (r. 1735<en>99) and his officials firmly incorporated into Altishahr and maintained as an integral part of Altishahr society. In turn, these Kirghiz, whom I call “inner Kirghiz,” went on to serve the Qing empire as active agents of early Qing state building efforts in Xinjiang. Using inner Kirghiz life stories, I will ultimately argue that boundaries separating “Qing” and “foreign” remained elastic throughout the second half of the eighteenth century. These boundaries were neither clear-cut nor permanent, constantly fluctuating according to the decisions made by the Qianlong emperor and his officials as well as the inner Kirghiz themselves.","PeriodicalId":43948,"journal":{"name":"LATE IMPERIAL CHINA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LATE IMPERIAL CHINA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/late.2023.a899674","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The scholarship on Qing Xinjiang has not paid much attention to the Qing relationship with the Kirghiz. On one hand, the Kirghiz, decentralized and fragmented, escape the attention of scholars interested in Qing relations with Central Asian “polities.” On the other hand, historians of Altishahr consider the Kirghiz as nomadic outsiders, only mentioning them in passing when their paths cross those of the Altishahri. A careful examination of Manchu-language palace memorials from the Qingdai Xinjiang Manwen dang’an huibian, however, shows that there was a subgroup of Kirghiz who the Qianlong emperor (r. 173599) and his officials firmly incorporated into Altishahr and maintained as an integral part of Altishahr society. In turn, these Kirghiz, whom I call “inner Kirghiz,” went on to serve the Qing empire as active agents of early Qing state building efforts in Xinjiang. Using inner Kirghiz life stories, I will ultimately argue that boundaries separating “Qing” and “foreign” remained elastic throughout the second half of the eighteenth century. These boundaries were neither clear-cut nor permanent, constantly fluctuating according to the decisions made by the Qianlong emperor and his officials as well as the inner Kirghiz themselves.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成为内吉尔吉斯人:清朝对新疆五部落的政策,1750 - 1790年
摘要:清代新疆学术界对清和吉尔吉斯的关系关注不多。一方面,分散和分散的吉尔吉斯人逃脱了对清朝与中亚“政治”关系感兴趣的学者的注意。另一方面,阿尔蒂什尔的历史学家认为吉尔吉斯人是游牧的外来者,只有当他们的道路与阿尔蒂什里人的道路交叉时才会顺便提及他们。然而,仔细研究来自青黛新疆满文当安会变的满语宫殿纪念物,可以发现,有一个吉尔吉斯人小组,乾隆皇帝(173599年在位)和他的官员坚定地融入了阿尔蒂什尔,并将其作为阿尔蒂什尔社会的一个组成部分。反过来,这些我称之为“内部吉尔吉斯人”的吉尔吉斯人,作为清朝早期在新疆建国的积极推动者,继续为清朝帝国服务。利用吉尔吉斯人内心的生活故事,我最终会认为,在整个18世纪下半叶,“清”和“洋”之间的界限仍然是弹性的。这些界限既不明确,也不永久,根据乾隆皇帝及其官员以及内部吉尔吉斯人自己的决定不断波动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Negotiating Ancestorhood: Epitaphs for the Unburied in Ming-Qing China Judicial Storytelling: Marriage Controversies in a Late Ming Case Collection Becoming Inner Kirghiz: Qing Policy Toward the Five Tribes in Xinjiang, 1750s–1790s "Killing the Adulterer": Masculine Revenge Fantasies in Seventeenth-Century China Local Politics and Book Production: The Popularization of Genealogies in Southern China, 1750s–1920s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1