Teaching Spanish Spelling in Grades 2–3: A Cross-National Approach

IF 1.5 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Reading & Writing Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-10-27 DOI:10.1080/10573569.2021.1965056
Remedios Guzmán, Sara C. de León, Desirée González, J. E. Jiménez
{"title":"Teaching Spanish Spelling in Grades 2–3: A Cross-National Approach","authors":"Remedios Guzmán, Sara C. de León, Desirée González, J. E. Jiménez","doi":"10.1080/10573569.2021.1965056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study aimed to explore instructional practices used to teach words with irregular spelling patterns by Spanish-speaking teachers in 2nd and 3rd grade of elementary school. A sample of 320 teachers from Guatemala, Ecuador, and Spain answered an online survey, which included the Spelling Instructional Practices Scale. Item Response Theory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis were used to analyze the construct validity and reliability of the Spelling Instructional Practices Scale. Results pointed out adequate fit indexes of the proposed models. Spelling instructional practices used by teachers were finally grouped into three factors. Results indicated that Spanish-speaking teachers teach irregular spelling words using a combination of instructional practices. Differences in the informed use of spelling instructional practices according to the teachers’ home countries were explored. Significant differences were found between Spanish and Latin-American teachers in the reported use of those instructional practices based on memorization and some materials to teach spelling. However, most teachers reported following a similar pattern when teaching irregular spelling to their students. Limitations and directions for future research are described.","PeriodicalId":51619,"journal":{"name":"Reading & Writing Quarterly","volume":"38 1","pages":"379 - 398"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading & Writing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2021.1965056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to explore instructional practices used to teach words with irregular spelling patterns by Spanish-speaking teachers in 2nd and 3rd grade of elementary school. A sample of 320 teachers from Guatemala, Ecuador, and Spain answered an online survey, which included the Spelling Instructional Practices Scale. Item Response Theory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis were used to analyze the construct validity and reliability of the Spelling Instructional Practices Scale. Results pointed out adequate fit indexes of the proposed models. Spelling instructional practices used by teachers were finally grouped into three factors. Results indicated that Spanish-speaking teachers teach irregular spelling words using a combination of instructional practices. Differences in the informed use of spelling instructional practices according to the teachers’ home countries were explored. Significant differences were found between Spanish and Latin-American teachers in the reported use of those instructional practices based on memorization and some materials to teach spelling. However, most teachers reported following a similar pattern when teaching irregular spelling to their students. Limitations and directions for future research are described.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2-3年级西班牙语拼写教学:跨国家教学法
摘要本研究旨在探讨小学二、三年级西班牙语教师教授拼写不规则单词的教学实践。来自危地马拉、厄瓜多尔和西班牙的320名教师参加了一项在线调查,其中包括拼写教学实践量表。运用项目反应理论和验证性因素分析法对《拼写教学实践量表》的结构有效性和信度进行了分析。结果表明,所提出的模型具有足够的拟合指标。教师使用的拼写教学实践最终被分为三个因素。结果表明,讲西班牙语的教师结合教学实践教授拼写不规则的单词。探讨了教师母国在知情使用拼写教学实践方面的差异。据报道,西班牙语和拉丁美洲教师在使用基于记忆的教学实践和一些拼写教学材料方面存在显著差异。然而,大多数教师在向学生教授不规则拼写时都遵循了类似的模式。介绍了未来研究的局限性和方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Argumentative Writing for Students With Disabilities in Inclusive Science Classes: A Pilot Study Online Intervention to Prevent Summer Learning Loss For Struggling First Grade Writers Can Artificial Intelligence Identify Reading Fluency and Level? Comparison of Human and Machine Performance Exploring Relations between Teachers’ Language- and Code-Based Writing Supports to Early Literacy and Vocabulary Learning in Children with Language Vulnerabilities The Technical Adequacy of Coding Procedures for Retell Measures in Elementary School Students with Dyslexia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1