Decoloniality, geopolitics of knowledge and historic turn: towards a Latin American agenda

IF 0.8 4区 管理学 Q1 HISTORY Management & Organizational History Pub Date : 2019-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17449359.2018.1431551
Sergio Wanderley, Amon Barros
{"title":"Decoloniality, geopolitics of knowledge and historic turn: towards a Latin American agenda","authors":"Sergio Wanderley, Amon Barros","doi":"10.1080/17449359.2018.1431551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this paper, we explore how a decolonial framework can inform management and organizational knowledge (MOK) with the objective of fostering a decolonized historic turn (HT) agenda from Latin America. MOK and the HT are demarcated by the predominance of Anglo-Saxon knowledge in which time fosters a colonizing effect. The HT has not promoted the inclusion of authors, theories, concepts, objects, and themes from other geographies. Hence, we have to make use of geopolitics of knowledge to reintroduce space and to deloconize the HT agenda. We believe that it is by exploring the (dis)encounters of the external and the internal sides of the border, in a double consciousness exercise, that we may foster a more plural field of MOK and a richer HT agenda. From this space of diverse epistemic encounter from both sides of the border, it would be possible to recognize and value what has been produced from the colonial difference, not as expressions of exoticism, but as relevant critical forms of knowledge produced and lived from the perspective of different histories and traditions. More than claims of purism, concepts of anthropophagy and sociological reduction may indicate that Latin America great virtue may be represented by its ability to adapt foreign knowledge to local reality generating something new without letting itself being catechized nor becoming a mimicry copy of the colonizer.","PeriodicalId":45724,"journal":{"name":"Management & Organizational History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17449359.2018.1431551","citationCount":"58","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management & Organizational History","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2018.1431551","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we explore how a decolonial framework can inform management and organizational knowledge (MOK) with the objective of fostering a decolonized historic turn (HT) agenda from Latin America. MOK and the HT are demarcated by the predominance of Anglo-Saxon knowledge in which time fosters a colonizing effect. The HT has not promoted the inclusion of authors, theories, concepts, objects, and themes from other geographies. Hence, we have to make use of geopolitics of knowledge to reintroduce space and to deloconize the HT agenda. We believe that it is by exploring the (dis)encounters of the external and the internal sides of the border, in a double consciousness exercise, that we may foster a more plural field of MOK and a richer HT agenda. From this space of diverse epistemic encounter from both sides of the border, it would be possible to recognize and value what has been produced from the colonial difference, not as expressions of exoticism, but as relevant critical forms of knowledge produced and lived from the perspective of different histories and traditions. More than claims of purism, concepts of anthropophagy and sociological reduction may indicate that Latin America great virtue may be represented by its ability to adapt foreign knowledge to local reality generating something new without letting itself being catechized nor becoming a mimicry copy of the colonizer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非殖民化、知识的地缘政治和历史性转变:走向拉丁美洲议程
摘要在本文中,我们探讨了非殖民化框架如何为管理和组织知识(MOK)提供信息,以促进拉丁美洲的非殖民化历史转折(HT)议程。MOK和HT是以盎格鲁撒克逊知识的主导地位来划分的,在这种知识中,时间助长了殖民效应。HT没有促进将其他地理领域的作者、理论、概念、对象和主题纳入其中。因此,我们必须利用知识的地缘政治来重新引入太空,并将HT议程分散开来。我们认为,正是通过探索边界内外双方的(dis)遭遇,在双重意识练习中,我们可以培养一个更多元的MOK领域和更丰富的HT议程。在这个来自边界两侧的不同认识相遇的空间里,我们有可能认识和重视殖民差异所产生的东西,而不是异国情调的表达,而是从不同历史和传统的角度产生和生活的相关批判性知识形式。不仅仅是纯粹主义的主张,人类吞噬和社会学还原的概念可能表明,拉丁美洲的伟大美德可能表现为它能够使外国知识适应当地现实,产生新的东西,而不会让自己受到质疑,也不会成为殖民者的模仿品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: Management & Organizational History (M&OH) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that aims to publish high quality, original, academic research concerning historical approaches to the study of management, organizations and organizing. The journal addresses issues from all areas of management, organization studies, and related fields. The unifying theme of M&OH is its historical orientation. The journal is both empirical and theoretical. It seeks to advance innovative historical methods. It facilitates interdisciplinary dialogue, especially between business and management history and organization theory. The ethos of M&OH is reflective, ethical, imaginative, critical, inter-disciplinary, and international, as well as historical in orientation.
期刊最新文献
Budgetary control and beyond budgeting from a historical perspective - insights from re-visiting the 1922 book by James O. McKinsey Organizing Spanish-British mining companies: the case of “La Española”, 1866-1942 A non-conforming technocratic dream: Howard Scott’s technocracy movement Networks throughout an institutional transition: the case of the former Meliá touristic group (1932-1978) Form and media in management and organizational history how different research programs transform the ‘Past’ into ‘History’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1