Symbolic Order in Sylvia Plath’s “Daddy” and “Lady Lazarus”: A Lacanian Reading

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE Anafora Pub Date : 2018-12-31 DOI:10.29162/anafora.v5i2.9
Somaye Mostafaei, Ensieh Shabanirad
{"title":"Symbolic Order in Sylvia Plath’s “Daddy” and “Lady Lazarus”: A Lacanian Reading","authors":"Somaye Mostafaei, Ensieh Shabanirad","doi":"10.29162/anafora.v5i2.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sylvia Plath’s works are mainly considered self-reflective mirrors that reverberate her predicaments, especially her troubled relationships with her father and her husband. Plath’s responses to gender-biased language, which is the main medium of male-dominated discourses, are full of conflicting desires. On the one hand, as one of the subjects of language, Plath wants to preserve her submissive position; on the other hand, as a poet, she desires to create her own order free of the restrictive and meddling presence of male-centered language. This paper thus aims to investigate the role of the Father in Sylvia Plath’s two significant works, “Daddy” (1965) and “Lady Lazarus” (1965), by the employment of Jacques Lacan’s views on the order of identity formation and creation of the subject, especially Lacan’s Symbolic Order. This paper is an attempt to investigate how the presence and absence of the father figure influences Plath and how she rebuilds a new Order with the free play of signification and devoid of the domineering voice of the Father.","PeriodicalId":40415,"journal":{"name":"Anafora","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anafora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29162/anafora.v5i2.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sylvia Plath’s works are mainly considered self-reflective mirrors that reverberate her predicaments, especially her troubled relationships with her father and her husband. Plath’s responses to gender-biased language, which is the main medium of male-dominated discourses, are full of conflicting desires. On the one hand, as one of the subjects of language, Plath wants to preserve her submissive position; on the other hand, as a poet, she desires to create her own order free of the restrictive and meddling presence of male-centered language. This paper thus aims to investigate the role of the Father in Sylvia Plath’s two significant works, “Daddy” (1965) and “Lady Lazarus” (1965), by the employment of Jacques Lacan’s views on the order of identity formation and creation of the subject, especially Lacan’s Symbolic Order. This paper is an attempt to investigate how the presence and absence of the father figure influences Plath and how she rebuilds a new Order with the free play of signification and devoid of the domineering voice of the Father.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sylvia Plath《爸爸》和《拉撒路夫人》中的象征秩序:拉康式解读
Sylvia Plath的作品主要被认为是反映她困境的自我反射镜,尤其是她与父亲和丈夫之间的麻烦关系。作为男性主导话语的主要媒介,普拉斯对性别偏见语言的回应充满了矛盾的欲望。一方面,作为语言的主体之一,普拉斯希望保持自己的顺从地位;另一方面,作为一名诗人,她渴望创造自己的秩序,摆脱以男性为中心的语言的限制和干预。因此,本文旨在通过运用雅克·拉康关于主体身份形成和创造秩序的观点,特别是拉康的象征秩序,来探讨父亲在西尔维娅·普拉斯的两部重要作品《爸爸》(1965)和《拉撒路夫人》(1965年)中的作用。本文试图探讨父亲形象的存在与缺失是如何影响普拉斯的,以及她是如何在意义的自由发挥和没有父亲霸气的声音的情况下重建新秩序的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anafora
Anafora LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Historical Metafiction: Elena Ferrante’s Neapolitan Novels as a Postmodern Rethinking of History Moderno kazalište iz estetskih perspektiva Yellowstone and the western revival O književnoj životinji u Kanižlićevoj Svetoj Rožaliji Sjena moje mame: Narativi o demenciji
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1