Visitors’ Feelings toward Moose and Coyote in a Wildlife Sanctuary: Transcendent Feelings of Animal Valuation Scale

IF 0.6 4区 农林科学 Q4 SOCIOLOGY Society & Animals Pub Date : 2022-01-25 DOI:10.1163/15685306-bja10071
Donna J Perry, Jacob P. Averka, Curto D. Johnson, Howie Powell, Amanda Cavanaugh
{"title":"Visitors’ Feelings toward Moose and Coyote in a Wildlife Sanctuary: Transcendent Feelings of Animal Valuation Scale","authors":"Donna J Perry, Jacob P. Averka, Curto D. Johnson, Howie Powell, Amanda Cavanaugh","doi":"10.1163/15685306-bja10071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nDespite the importance of biodiversity, humans value some species more highly than others. Placing different levels of value on species can impact nonhuman animal welfare and conservation. Feelings are central to value recognition. It’s critical to better understand how to foster positive feelings toward different species. The purpose of this study was to test the Transcendent Feelings of Animal Valuation scale and evaluate the influence of a wildlife sanctuary visit on feelings toward moose and coyotes. The scale was piloted with 29 visitors and demonstrated good reliability. It was then administered to 100 visitors. At baseline, participants had a significantly stronger emotional valuation of moose compared to coyote, consistent with negative social constructions of coyotes. Both moose and coyote scores increased significantly from pre- to post-visit, suggesting that exposure to wildlife in a sanctuary setting can increase feelings of valuation toward diverse species. The experience may also influence wildlife stewardship.","PeriodicalId":22000,"journal":{"name":"Society & Animals","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society & Animals","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-bja10071","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Despite the importance of biodiversity, humans value some species more highly than others. Placing different levels of value on species can impact nonhuman animal welfare and conservation. Feelings are central to value recognition. It’s critical to better understand how to foster positive feelings toward different species. The purpose of this study was to test the Transcendent Feelings of Animal Valuation scale and evaluate the influence of a wildlife sanctuary visit on feelings toward moose and coyotes. The scale was piloted with 29 visitors and demonstrated good reliability. It was then administered to 100 visitors. At baseline, participants had a significantly stronger emotional valuation of moose compared to coyote, consistent with negative social constructions of coyotes. Both moose and coyote scores increased significantly from pre- to post-visit, suggesting that exposure to wildlife in a sanctuary setting can increase feelings of valuation toward diverse species. The experience may also influence wildlife stewardship.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
野生动物保护区游客对驼鹿和郊狼的感受——动物价值量表的超越感
尽管生物多样性很重要,但人类对某些物种的重视程度高于其他物种。对物种赋予不同程度的价值可能会影响非人类动物的福利和保护。情感是价值认同的核心。更好地理解如何培养对不同物种的积极情感是至关重要的。本研究的目的是测试动物评估量表的超越感,并评估参观野生动物保护区对驼鹿和郊狼感情的影响。该量表由29名访客进行了试点,并显示出良好的可靠性。随后对100名访客进行了管理。在基线时,与郊狼相比,参与者对驼鹿的情感评价明显更强,这与郊狼的负面社会结构一致。驼鹿和郊狼的得分从访问前到访问后都显著增加,这表明在保护区环境中接触野生动物可以增加对不同物种的评价。这种经历也可能影响野生动物的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Society & Animals
Society & Animals 社会科学-兽医学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Society & Animals publishes studies that describe and analyze our experiences of non-human animals from the perspective of various disciplines within both the Social Sciences (e.g., psychology, sociology, anthropology, political science) and the Humanities (e.g., history, literary criticism). The journal specifically deals with subjects such as human-animal interactions in various settings (animal cruelty, the therapeutic uses of animals), the applied uses of animals (research, education, medicine and agriculture), the use of animals in popular culture (e.g. dog-fighting, circus, animal companion, animal research), attitudes toward animals as affected by different socializing agencies and strategies, representations of animals in literature, the history of the domestication of animals, the politics of animal welfare, and the constitution of the animal rights movement.
期刊最新文献
Toward Commensalism: Deconstructing the Intersectionality of Racism and Speciesism Foster Puppies as Therapeutic Partners: A Model for Mutual Benefit Effects of Human-Dolphin Interactions on Tourist Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward Dolphins Coyote Killing: Where Species and Identities Collide Factors Associated with Children’s Humane Attitudes toward Animals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1