The Harnessed Lightning, or the Politics of Apocalypse: Hegel, Rosenzweig, Derrida

Q2 Arts and Humanities Praktyka Teoretyczna Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.19195/prt.2022.1.4
A. Bielik-Robson
{"title":"The Harnessed Lightning, or the Politics of Apocalypse: Hegel, Rosenzweig, Derrida","authors":"A. Bielik-Robson","doi":"10.19195/prt.2022.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What could be the common thread linking these three very different thinkers: Hegel, Rosenzweig, and Derrida? In my essay, I will argue that this link is provided by a certain form of political theology which is polemical towards Carl Schmitt’s notion of the katechon or the “restrainer of the apocalypse.” While the political theology which they propose is also based on the idea of the restraint, it takes a different form than the Schmittian postponement of the apocalyptic event. Their alternative notion is attenuation which results in the political and philosophical practice of maintaining a distance between God and the world. Neither simply restraining it, nor simply hastening, this new formula takes a third dialectical position between the katechon and the apocalyptic, which consists in “easing the lightning to the children”: the world as God’s child—weak, fragile, and exposed to the infinite power of creation and destruction—must nonetheless find a way to use the revelatory power of the eschaton for the immanent purposes.","PeriodicalId":36093,"journal":{"name":"Praktyka Teoretyczna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Praktyka Teoretyczna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19195/prt.2022.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What could be the common thread linking these three very different thinkers: Hegel, Rosenzweig, and Derrida? In my essay, I will argue that this link is provided by a certain form of political theology which is polemical towards Carl Schmitt’s notion of the katechon or the “restrainer of the apocalypse.” While the political theology which they propose is also based on the idea of the restraint, it takes a different form than the Schmittian postponement of the apocalyptic event. Their alternative notion is attenuation which results in the political and philosophical practice of maintaining a distance between God and the world. Neither simply restraining it, nor simply hastening, this new formula takes a third dialectical position between the katechon and the apocalyptic, which consists in “easing the lightning to the children”: the world as God’s child—weak, fragile, and exposed to the infinite power of creation and destruction—must nonetheless find a way to use the revelatory power of the eschaton for the immanent purposes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
驾驭的闪电,还是启示录的政治:黑格尔、罗森茨威格、德里达
将黑格尔、罗森茨威格和德里达这三位截然不同的思想家联系在一起的共同线索是什么?在我的文章中,我将争辩说,这种联系是由某种形式的政治神学提供的,这种政治神学对卡尔·施密特的katechon或“世界末日的制约者”的概念是有争议的。虽然他们提出的政治神学也基于制约的思想,但它采取了与施密特推迟世界末日事件不同的形式。他们的另一个概念是衰减,这导致了在上帝和世界之间保持距离的政治和哲学实践。这一新公式既不是简单地抑制它,也不是简单地加速它,它在katechon和启示录之间采取了第三种辩证立场,即“给孩子们释放闪电”:世界是上帝的孩子——软弱、脆弱、,并暴露在创造和毁灭的无限力量中——尽管如此,必须找到一种方法,将末世的启示力量用于内在目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Praktyka Teoretyczna
Praktyka Teoretyczna Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
„Na hałdach rosną ludzie”: literacka historia pogórniczych środowisk sprzymierzeńczych The Doomsday Economy: Colonial Violence, Environmental Catastrophe, and Burning Tires in Palestine Dialektyka natury i społeczeństwa przeciwko monizmowi. Esej recenzyjny z „Marx in the Anthropocene” Kohei Saita (2023, Cambridge University Press) Francuski atom a kapitał symboliczny Bourdieu Rewolucyjne siły reprodukcji? Esej recenzyjny wokół książki Stefanii Barci, „Forces of Reproduction: Notes for a Counter-Hegemonic Anthropocene” (2020, Cambridge University Press)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1