Patients’ Satisfaction on Virtual Clinic in Primary Health Care Centers in Prince Sultan Military Medical City, 2020-2021: A Qualitative Study

M. A. Alshehri, Layth Khalid Alsulaiman, Ayman, Afify, Kholoud Habib, Mostafa Kofi
{"title":"Patients’ Satisfaction on Virtual Clinic in Primary Health Care Centers in Prince Sultan Military Medical City, 2020-2021: A Qualitative Study","authors":"M. A. Alshehri, Layth Khalid Alsulaiman, Ayman, Afify, Kholoud Habib, Mostafa Kofi","doi":"10.29011/2688-7460.100096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Settings and background: With technology evolvement and COVID-19 Pandemic Virtual clinics are increasing nowadays, there is no single qualitative study in Saudi Arabia that make us knows patients’ opinion about this service, and this is what our study is about. Methods: It is a semi-structured phone interview of 36 participants who attended the virtual clinic in Prince Sultan Military Hospital in 2020, selected purposefully, then the interviews were transcribed then analyzed by thematic analysis. Results: 20 of the participants were males (55.5%) and 16 of them were females (44.4%), 6 were above or equal to 60 years of age (16.6%) and 30 participants were below 60 years of age (83.3%). In Theme 1: (Were the steps taken in the referral process to this service clear?) 75% (n=27) of them answered positively, 22.2% (n=8) answered negatively and one participant was neutral. In Theme 2: (Comparing to previous regular clinic visits, how did you find receiving information about your health in this clinic?) 27.7% (n=10) think it is better than regular clinic, However, 19.4% (n=6) think it is worse than the regular clinic, and the majority 55.5% (n=20) think they are the same. In Theme 3: was (Describe for us your experience in getting the medications form the pharmacy after the clinic) 77.7% (n=28) of participants were satisfied and 2 patients were not satisfied, remaining 6 did not take medicines. Conclusions: Virtual clinic is a good method in reducing costs and time in delivering health care, in patients’ opinions. In general, virtual clinic had high satisfaction rate among who benefit from the service. However, there are some concerns need to be addressed like referral or booking process for virtual clinic services.","PeriodicalId":93553,"journal":{"name":"Family medicine and primary care -- open access","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family medicine and primary care -- open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/2688-7460.100096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Settings and background: With technology evolvement and COVID-19 Pandemic Virtual clinics are increasing nowadays, there is no single qualitative study in Saudi Arabia that make us knows patients’ opinion about this service, and this is what our study is about. Methods: It is a semi-structured phone interview of 36 participants who attended the virtual clinic in Prince Sultan Military Hospital in 2020, selected purposefully, then the interviews were transcribed then analyzed by thematic analysis. Results: 20 of the participants were males (55.5%) and 16 of them were females (44.4%), 6 were above or equal to 60 years of age (16.6%) and 30 participants were below 60 years of age (83.3%). In Theme 1: (Were the steps taken in the referral process to this service clear?) 75% (n=27) of them answered positively, 22.2% (n=8) answered negatively and one participant was neutral. In Theme 2: (Comparing to previous regular clinic visits, how did you find receiving information about your health in this clinic?) 27.7% (n=10) think it is better than regular clinic, However, 19.4% (n=6) think it is worse than the regular clinic, and the majority 55.5% (n=20) think they are the same. In Theme 3: was (Describe for us your experience in getting the medications form the pharmacy after the clinic) 77.7% (n=28) of participants were satisfied and 2 patients were not satisfied, remaining 6 did not take medicines. Conclusions: Virtual clinic is a good method in reducing costs and time in delivering health care, in patients’ opinions. In general, virtual clinic had high satisfaction rate among who benefit from the service. However, there are some concerns need to be addressed like referral or booking process for virtual clinic services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2020-2021年苏丹王子军事医疗城初级卫生保健中心虚拟诊所患者满意度的定性研究
背景和背景:随着技术的发展和新冠肺炎大流行虚拟诊所的增加,在沙特阿拉伯没有一项定性研究能让我们了解患者对这项服务的看法,这就是我们的研究。方法:这是对2020年在苏丹王子军事医院虚拟诊所就诊的36名参与者的半结构化电话采访,有目的地选择,然后转录采访内容,然后通过主题分析进行分析。结果:20名参与者为男性(55.5%),16名参与者为女性(44.4%),6名参与者年龄在60岁以上(16.6%),30名参与者年龄低于60岁(83.3%)。主题1:(转介过程中采取的步骤是否明确?)75%(n=27)的参与者回答积极,22.2%(n=8)回答消极,1名参与者回答中立。主题2:(与以前的定期门诊相比,你是如何发现在这个诊所收到关于你的健康信息的?)27.7%(n=10)认为它比常规诊所好,然而,19.4%(n=6)认为它比常规诊所差,大多数55.5%(n=20)认为它们是一样的。在主题3中:是(为我们描述您在门诊后从药房获得药物的经验)77.7%(n=28)的参与者满意,2名患者不满意,其余6名患者没有服药。结论:在患者看来,虚拟诊所是一种降低医疗保健成本和时间的好方法。总体而言,虚拟诊所在受益人群中的满意度较高。然而,也有一些问题需要解决,比如虚拟诊所服务的转诊或预订流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Polishing Resident Advocacy Curriculums in Primary Care Feasibility and Utility of Point-Of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in Primary Care Practice. EKOAP Pilot Study Right Cornual Pregnancy: A Case Report and Review of Literature Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Therapy for Treatment of Acute Tonsillitis at Primary Care level in Qatar- Clinical Audit Report Validation of a Novel Point-of-Care Testing Device Designed for Assessment of NT-pro BNP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1