The Finnic Tetrameter – A Creolization of Poetic Form?

IF 0.4 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Studia Metrica et Poetica Pub Date : 2019-08-29 DOI:10.12697/SMP.2019.6.1.02
Frog
{"title":"The Finnic Tetrameter – A Creolization of Poetic Form?","authors":"Frog","doi":"10.12697/SMP.2019.6.1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a new theory on the origins of the common Finnic tetrameter as a poetic form (also called the Kalevala-meter, regilaul meter, etc.). It argues that this verse form emerged as a creolization of the North Germanic alliterative verse form during a period of intensive language contacts, and that the Finnic ethnopoetic ecology made it isosyllabic. Previous theories have focused on the trochaic, tetrametric structure and viewed other features of poetic form as secondary or incidental. This is the first theory to offer a metrically driven explanation for the distinctive features of the poetic form: the systematic placement of lexically stressed short syllables in metrically unstressed positions and systematic yet unmetricalized use of verse-internal alliteration. The emergence of the poetic form may be viewed simply in terms of hybridization, but its formation as a central mode for epic and ritual poetry demands consideration of social factors. Creolization is considered a social process of hybridization at the level of sign systems that is characterized by a salient asymmetrical relation of power, authority or other value in the cultural sign systems being reconfigured from the perspective of the society or groups involved. An argument is presented that North Germanic contacts also produced systematic verse-internal alliteration in Finnic languages. Discussion then turns to the distinction between the origin and spread of the poetic form. The poetic form’s uniformity across Finnic language areas in spite of its ‘foreign’ metrical features along with the range of genres with which it was used are considered indicators of the poetic form’s spread with language, forming an argument that the tetrameter emerged within an environment that also produced Late Proto-Finnic, and then spread with Late Proto-Finnic language and culture through areas where other Finnic language forms were spoken.","PeriodicalId":55924,"journal":{"name":"Studia Metrica et Poetica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Metrica et Poetica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12697/SMP.2019.6.1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article presents a new theory on the origins of the common Finnic tetrameter as a poetic form (also called the Kalevala-meter, regilaul meter, etc.). It argues that this verse form emerged as a creolization of the North Germanic alliterative verse form during a period of intensive language contacts, and that the Finnic ethnopoetic ecology made it isosyllabic. Previous theories have focused on the trochaic, tetrametric structure and viewed other features of poetic form as secondary or incidental. This is the first theory to offer a metrically driven explanation for the distinctive features of the poetic form: the systematic placement of lexically stressed short syllables in metrically unstressed positions and systematic yet unmetricalized use of verse-internal alliteration. The emergence of the poetic form may be viewed simply in terms of hybridization, but its formation as a central mode for epic and ritual poetry demands consideration of social factors. Creolization is considered a social process of hybridization at the level of sign systems that is characterized by a salient asymmetrical relation of power, authority or other value in the cultural sign systems being reconfigured from the perspective of the society or groups involved. An argument is presented that North Germanic contacts also produced systematic verse-internal alliteration in Finnic languages. Discussion then turns to the distinction between the origin and spread of the poetic form. The poetic form’s uniformity across Finnic language areas in spite of its ‘foreign’ metrical features along with the range of genres with which it was used are considered indicators of the poetic form’s spread with language, forming an argument that the tetrameter emerged within an environment that also produced Late Proto-Finnic, and then spread with Late Proto-Finnic language and culture through areas where other Finnic language forms were spoken.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
芬尼四声部——诗歌形式的克里奥尔化?
本文对常见的芬兰人四声部作为一种诗歌形式(也称为Kalevala声部、regilaul声部等)的起源提出了一种新的理论,认为这种诗歌形式是在语言密集接触时期北日耳曼头韵诗歌形式的克里奥尔化而出现的,芬兰人的民族诗歌生态使其具有双音节性。先前的理论都集中在韵律、四聚体结构上,并将诗歌形式的其他特征视为次要或偶然的。这是第一个对诗歌形式的独特特征提供度量驱动解释的理论:有系统地将词汇重音的短音节置于有度量的非重音位置,以及有系统但未戏剧化地使用诗歌内部头韵。诗歌形式的出现可以简单地从杂交的角度来看待,但它作为史诗和仪式诗的中心模式的形成需要考虑社会因素。克里奥尔化被认为是符号系统层面的一种社会杂交过程,其特征是从所涉及的社会或群体的角度重新配置文化符号系统中的权力、权威或其他价值的显著不对称关系。有一种观点认为,北日耳曼人的接触也在芬尼语中产生了系统的诗歌内部头韵。然后讨论诗歌形式的起源和传播之间的区别。尽管诗歌形式具有“外国”韵律特征,但其在芬尼语地区的统一性以及使用的体裁范围被认为是诗歌形式随语言传播的指标,形成了一种论点,即四聚体出现在一个也产生了晚期原芬尼语的环境中,然后随着晚期原芬尼语的语言和文化通过其他芬尼语形式的地区传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Metrica et Poetica
Studia Metrica et Poetica LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
6
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Metrics of Four Czech Poets in Russian Translations Russian Binary Meters. Part Two. Chapters 7–8 Strophes in Peshitta Psalms? A Study of Selected Examples Rhyme in dróttkvætt, from Old Germanic Inheritance to Contemporary Poetic Ecology I: Overview and Argument The Development of a Poetic Tradition. A Study of a Dutch Renaissance Poetry Corpus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1