{"title":"Whaddayou Mean “ςπουδαιογɛλοιον”?: Nabi's Last Laugh","authors":"T. Marshall","doi":"10.1215/01903659-9789696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In his late unpublished essay “Dionysus in 1992,” Norman O. Brown arrived at the ancient Greek term “spoudaiogeloion” to express his idea of a “serious laughter” that could respond to dialectical tensions without unbalancing them. Brown had, in 1959, converted Freud's Witz book into a serious theory of art. This turned the focus on humor into a focus on art, subtly repressing the place of laughter in art and thinking for Brown and those who took him seriously. His casual conversation was always full of fun, but his formal thought lacked that liberating concept until the last decade of his life. Not even the accusation by Marcuse of “mystification” could bring him out of his idealizations—until he saw the dialectical power of humor's ambivalence. “Spoudaiogeloion,” with room for Joyce's farcical wit and Blake's high visions, gave Brown a useful “way out” of tensions between “high” and “low” art or philosophy.","PeriodicalId":46332,"journal":{"name":"Boundary 2-An International Journal of Literature and Culture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boundary 2-An International Journal of Literature and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/01903659-9789696","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In his late unpublished essay “Dionysus in 1992,” Norman O. Brown arrived at the ancient Greek term “spoudaiogeloion” to express his idea of a “serious laughter” that could respond to dialectical tensions without unbalancing them. Brown had, in 1959, converted Freud's Witz book into a serious theory of art. This turned the focus on humor into a focus on art, subtly repressing the place of laughter in art and thinking for Brown and those who took him seriously. His casual conversation was always full of fun, but his formal thought lacked that liberating concept until the last decade of his life. Not even the accusation by Marcuse of “mystification” could bring him out of his idealizations—until he saw the dialectical power of humor's ambivalence. “Spoudaiogeloion,” with room for Joyce's farcical wit and Blake's high visions, gave Brown a useful “way out” of tensions between “high” and “low” art or philosophy.
诺曼·O·布朗(Norman O.Brown)在其晚期未发表的文章《1992年的酒神》(Dionysus In 1992)中提出了古希腊语“spoudaiogeloion”一词,以表达他对“严肃的笑声”的看法,这种笑声可以对辩证的紧张关系做出反应,而不会使它们失衡。1959年,布朗将弗洛伊德的《威茨》一书转变为一种严肃的艺术理论。这将对幽默的关注转变为对艺术的关注,巧妙地压制了笑在艺术中的地位,并为布朗和那些认真对待他的人思考。他随意的谈话总是充满乐趣,但直到生命的最后十年,他的正式思想才缺乏这种解放的概念。甚至马尔库塞对“神秘化”的指责也无法使他摆脱理想化——直到他看到幽默矛盾心理的辩证力量。《斯波达奥吉隆》为乔伊斯的滑稽机智和布莱克的高瞻远瞩提供了空间,为布朗摆脱“高”与“低”艺术或哲学之间的紧张关系提供了一条有用的“出路”。
期刊介绍:
Extending beyond the postmodern, boundary 2, an international journal of literature and culture, approaches problems in these areas from a number of politically, historically, and theoretically informed perspectives. boundary 2 remains committed to understanding the present and approaching the study of national and international culture and politics through literature and the human sciences.