NGO accountability to donors: better said than done?

Maria Jesús Ríos Romero, Elena Urquía-Grande, Carmen Abril
{"title":"NGO accountability to donors: better said than done?","authors":"Maria Jesús Ríos Romero, Elena Urquía-Grande, Carmen Abril","doi":"10.17561/ree.n1.2023.7410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing involvement of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in solving development problems has led to an increase in the number of NGOs around the world and therefore in their visibility and influence. Although concerns about the role and responsibility of NGOs have been raised from more than 20 years, there is still a need to ensure good practices in NGOs and to determine what measures will improve NGOs’ accountability to their stakeholders. Our study aims to contribute to this initiative from the donor accountability approach. To achieve this goal, we conducted a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis to analyze the constraints and needs that donor accountability pose to NGOs. Our findings suggest that donor accountability could interfere with NGOs’ activities, leading them to generate short-term results, focus more on financial results, and feel increased pressure on overhead costs. The most recent literature opens an opportunity, however, to make upward accountability more useful for NGOs. Following this trend, we propose that donor accountability be considered as a dimension to assess NGO quality so that it becomes a powerful marketing tool to attract and retain donors.","PeriodicalId":41443,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios Empresariales-Segunda Epoca","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudios Empresariales-Segunda Epoca","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17561/ree.n1.2023.7410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing involvement of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in solving development problems has led to an increase in the number of NGOs around the world and therefore in their visibility and influence. Although concerns about the role and responsibility of NGOs have been raised from more than 20 years, there is still a need to ensure good practices in NGOs and to determine what measures will improve NGOs’ accountability to their stakeholders. Our study aims to contribute to this initiative from the donor accountability approach. To achieve this goal, we conducted a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis to analyze the constraints and needs that donor accountability pose to NGOs. Our findings suggest that donor accountability could interfere with NGOs’ activities, leading them to generate short-term results, focus more on financial results, and feel increased pressure on overhead costs. The most recent literature opens an opportunity, however, to make upward accountability more useful for NGOs. Following this trend, we propose that donor accountability be considered as a dimension to assess NGO quality so that it becomes a powerful marketing tool to attract and retain donors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非政府组织对捐助者的问责:说起来比做起来好?
非政府组织越来越多地参与解决发展问题,导致世界各地非政府组织的数量增加,从而提高了其知名度和影响力。尽管20多年来人们一直对非政府组织的作用和责任表示关切,但仍有必要确保非政府组织采取良好做法,并确定哪些措施将改善非政府组织对其利益攸关方的问责。我们的研究旨在从捐助者问责制的角度为这一举措作出贡献。为了实现这一目标,我们进行了系统的文献综述和文献计量分析,以分析捐助者问责制对非政府组织造成的制约和需求。我们的研究结果表明,捐助者的问责制可能会干扰非政府组织的活动,导致它们产生短期成果,更多地关注财务成果,并感受到管理费用的压力增加。然而,最近的文献提供了一个机会,使向上问责对非政府组织更有用。根据这一趋势,我们建议将捐助者问责制视为评估非政府组织质量的一个层面,使其成为吸引和留住捐助者的强大营销工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Estudio de la autocorrelación espacial en el mercado inmobiliario comercial de la ciudad de Madrid Pandemia en el mercado de la vivienda española La Vivienda de Protección Oficial como una herramienta de política en las comunidades autónomas. Un análisis empírico durante el período 2008-2022 Tipo de interés, precios y transacciones de vivienda en España Valoración automática de inmuebles residenciales mediante modelos de Machine Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1