What are Teachers Reading and Why?: An Analysis of Elementary Read Aloud Titles and the Rationales Underlying Teachers’ Selections

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Literacy Research and Instruction Pub Date : 2022-01-03 DOI:10.1080/19388071.2021.2008558
Kristin Conradi Smith, Craig A. Young, Jane Core Yatzeck
{"title":"What are Teachers Reading and Why?: An Analysis of Elementary Read Aloud Titles and the Rationales Underlying Teachers’ Selections","authors":"Kristin Conradi Smith, Craig A. Young, Jane Core Yatzeck","doi":"10.1080/19388071.2021.2008558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Although reading aloud to elementary students is a common practice, few studies have focused on the actual texts read, beyond considerations of fiction versus nonfiction, and few studies have included a line of inquiry exploring teachers’ rationales for text selection. In this mixed-methods study, we pair a content analysis of the reported read aloud titles of over 1000 teachers with interviews of a subset of teachers to understand the rationales behind their choices. For the content analysis, we analyzed the titles for multiple features (e.g., text type, publication year, inclusion in a series, etc.). Results suggest teachers still prefer fiction for read aloud events and the titles read are, on average, 25 years old. Our interviews with 14 teachers revealed that a myriad of factors inform their decisions for selecting the texts that they read in their respective classrooms. Overall, teachers’ reasons tended to focus on instructional, affective, or contextual rationales. Although teachers acknowledged the importance of context and representation, there is an apparent disconnect between what teachers said mattered and what were represented in the analysis of titles. Implications for future research and classroom practices are included.","PeriodicalId":45434,"journal":{"name":"Literacy Research and Instruction","volume":"61 1","pages":"383 - 401"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literacy Research and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2021.2008558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although reading aloud to elementary students is a common practice, few studies have focused on the actual texts read, beyond considerations of fiction versus nonfiction, and few studies have included a line of inquiry exploring teachers’ rationales for text selection. In this mixed-methods study, we pair a content analysis of the reported read aloud titles of over 1000 teachers with interviews of a subset of teachers to understand the rationales behind their choices. For the content analysis, we analyzed the titles for multiple features (e.g., text type, publication year, inclusion in a series, etc.). Results suggest teachers still prefer fiction for read aloud events and the titles read are, on average, 25 years old. Our interviews with 14 teachers revealed that a myriad of factors inform their decisions for selecting the texts that they read in their respective classrooms. Overall, teachers’ reasons tended to focus on instructional, affective, or contextual rationales. Although teachers acknowledged the importance of context and representation, there is an apparent disconnect between what teachers said mattered and what were represented in the analysis of titles. Implications for future research and classroom practices are included.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师在读什么?为什么?:浅析小学朗读题及其教师选择依据
摘要尽管向小学生大声朗读是一种常见的做法,但除了考虑小说与非小说之外,很少有研究关注实际阅读的文本,也很少有研究包括探究教师选择文本的理由。在这项混合方法研究中,我们将1000多名教师报告的朗读标题的内容分析与一部分教师的访谈配对,以了解他们选择背后的理由。在内容分析中,我们分析了标题的多种特征(如文本类型、出版年份、系列收录等)。结果表明,教师在朗读活动中仍然更喜欢小说,阅读的标题平均为25岁。我们对14名教师的采访显示,在选择他们在各自课堂上阅读的课文时,有很多因素会影响他们的决定。总的来说,教师的理由往往集中在教学、情感或上下文的理由上。尽管教师们承认背景和代表性的重要性,但教师们所说的重要内容与头衔分析中所代表的内容之间存在明显的脱节。包括对未来研究和课堂实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Literacy Research and Instruction
Literacy Research and Instruction EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Literacy Research and Instruction (formerly Reading Research and Instruction), the official journal of the College Reading Association, is an international refereed professional journal that publishes articles dealing with research and instruction in reading education and allied literacy fields. The journal is especially focused on instructional practices and applied or basic research of special interest to reading and literacy educators. Peer Review Policy: All articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by reviewers.
期刊最新文献
Empowering Adolescent Emergent Readers in Government Schools: An Exploration of Multimodal Texts as Pathways to Comprehension Novice Teachers’ Knowledge of Racial Literacies Effect of Dramatic Storytelling on Emergent Literacy in EFL: Evidence from the UAE Kindergartens Reexamining the Dolch Basic Sight Word List: Contemporary Considerations for Culturally Sustaining Approaches to Assess Sight Word Development A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Synchronous Paired Oral Reading Techniques in Elementary Classrooms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1