Academic Malpractice in Tests and Exams from an International Perspective

Agnieszka M. Sendur
{"title":"Academic Malpractice in Tests and Exams from an International Perspective","authors":"Agnieszka M. Sendur","doi":"10.12775/pbe.2022.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cheating in exams and other forms of academic dishonesty have been reported to be a serious issue in many countries. A lot of research has been conducted on the topic, but it focuses mainly on the US context. Studies pertaining to the problem in other countries are rather scarce. The existing research considers the issue from different perspectives. Some studies concentrate on the scope of the problem in a particular country, others choose to research individual and contextual factors in cheating, or students’ perceptions of and attitudes towards exam malpractice. The surveys are often restricted to selected nationalities, the questions arelimited to the frequency of cheating and they rarely include reference to the methods used. In reaction to the rarity of research on cheating methods among students from different cultural backgrounds, an international questionnaire survey was undertaken. Its aim, among others, was to answer two research questions: (1) What methods do students use to cheat in tests and exams? (2) Are there significant cultural differences in the way students cheat in tests and exams? Students from France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Ukraine, the USA and other countries were asked in an online questionnaire about the methods they have used to cheat in tests and exams. The results of the survey conducted on 1309 students show that there are similarities but also differences between the cultures with reference to the scope and to the methods used to cheat. The findings should be taken into consideration in classroom and high-stakes assessment, but also in any cross-national comparisons of students’ outcomes. Teachers, administrators and researchers ought to be aware that the differences in attitudes towards academic cheating between the nationalities may influence test validity.","PeriodicalId":33219,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad Badan Edukacyjnych","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad Badan Edukacyjnych","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/pbe.2022.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cheating in exams and other forms of academic dishonesty have been reported to be a serious issue in many countries. A lot of research has been conducted on the topic, but it focuses mainly on the US context. Studies pertaining to the problem in other countries are rather scarce. The existing research considers the issue from different perspectives. Some studies concentrate on the scope of the problem in a particular country, others choose to research individual and contextual factors in cheating, or students’ perceptions of and attitudes towards exam malpractice. The surveys are often restricted to selected nationalities, the questions arelimited to the frequency of cheating and they rarely include reference to the methods used. In reaction to the rarity of research on cheating methods among students from different cultural backgrounds, an international questionnaire survey was undertaken. Its aim, among others, was to answer two research questions: (1) What methods do students use to cheat in tests and exams? (2) Are there significant cultural differences in the way students cheat in tests and exams? Students from France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Ukraine, the USA and other countries were asked in an online questionnaire about the methods they have used to cheat in tests and exams. The results of the survey conducted on 1309 students show that there are similarities but also differences between the cultures with reference to the scope and to the methods used to cheat. The findings should be taken into consideration in classroom and high-stakes assessment, but also in any cross-national comparisons of students’ outcomes. Teachers, administrators and researchers ought to be aware that the differences in attitudes towards academic cheating between the nationalities may influence test validity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从国际角度看考试中的学术不端行为
据报道,在许多国家,考试作弊和其他形式的学术不诚实是一个严重的问题。关于这个话题已经进行了很多研究,但主要集中在美国的背景下。其他国家对这一问题的研究相当稀少。现有的研究从不同的角度考虑这个问题。一些研究集中于特定国家的问题范围,另一些研究则选择研究作弊中的个人和背景因素,或学生对考试舞弊的看法和态度。调查通常仅限于选定的国家,问题仅限于作弊的频率,而且很少提及所使用的方法。针对来自不同文化背景的学生中很少有关于作弊方法的研究,进行了一项国际问卷调查。它的目的是回答两个研究问题:(1)学生在考试中使用什么方法作弊?(2) 学生在考试和考试中作弊的方式是否存在显著的文化差异?来自法国、德国、意大利、西班牙、乌克兰、美国和其他国家的学生在一份在线问卷中被问及他们在考试中作弊的方法。对1309名学生进行的调查结果表明,在作弊的范围和方法方面,不同文化之间既有相似之处,也有差异。在课堂和高风险评估中,以及在任何对学生成绩的跨国比较中,都应该考虑这些发现。教师、管理人员和研究人员应该意识到,不同民族对学术作弊的态度差异可能会影响考试的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊最新文献
Risk Factors of Gambling Disorder Among Adults – Research Report Emotional and Motivational School Readiness of Six-Year-Old Children and Parental Support in Mothers’ Assessments Work in the Experience of Persons with Intellectual Disabilities. A Focus Group Research Report Basic Aspects of the Erotetic Logic and the Role of Questions in Empirical Cognition in Pedagogical Research Practice The Cognitive Component of Academic Teachers’ Attitudes Towards E-Learning – Research Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1