THE BIDEN DOCTRINE AND THE WAR IN UKRAINE: RENEWED TRANSATLANTIC RELATIONS OR REATLANTISATION BETWEEN A STRATEGIC AND ASITUATIONAL PARTNERSHIP

IF 0.2 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY TEORIJA IN PRAKSA Pub Date : 2022-12-29 DOI:10.51936/tip.59.4.969-988
Boško Picula, Đana Luša
{"title":"THE BIDEN DOCTRINE AND THE WAR IN UKRAINE: RENEWED TRANSATLANTIC RELATIONS OR REATLANTISATION BETWEEN A STRATEGIC AND ASITUATIONAL PARTNERSHIP","authors":"Boško Picula, Đana Luša","doi":"10.51936/tip.59.4.969-988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The war in Ukraine is the most significant threat to the peace of the Euro-Atlantic area in decades. After 4 years of Trump’s weakening of transatlantic relations, Biden’s presumed foreign policy doctrine includes their quick renewal, or re-Atlantisation. The article problematises the ‘new’ strategy of containment given Russia’s aggression, the state of transatlantic relations, and the current global order’s configuration, whereby the transatlantic bond is being strengthened and the formation of Biden’s foreign policy doctrine is being followed by a ‘grand-strategic’ shift. Four different models of transatlantic relations (mutual autonomy, strategic autonomy, strategic partnership, situational partnership) are discussed where variables include the approach taken by the USA to transatlantic relations, and the approach of Europe’s EU and NATO members to transatlantic relations are addressed. The main argument is that transatlantic relations during Biden’s mandate have constantly oscillated between a stra-tegic partnership, especially related to common goals of democracy promotion and containment and situ-ational partnership. Situations like the war in Ukraine have simultaneously acted to strengthen the American–European partnership based on the shared security and political interests.Keywords: transatlantic relations, reatlantisation, USA, Europe, Biden doctrine, war in Ukraine, strategic part-nership, situational partnership","PeriodicalId":44389,"journal":{"name":"TEORIJA IN PRAKSA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEORIJA IN PRAKSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51936/tip.59.4.969-988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The war in Ukraine is the most significant threat to the peace of the Euro-Atlantic area in decades. After 4 years of Trump’s weakening of transatlantic relations, Biden’s presumed foreign policy doctrine includes their quick renewal, or re-Atlantisation. The article problematises the ‘new’ strategy of containment given Russia’s aggression, the state of transatlantic relations, and the current global order’s configuration, whereby the transatlantic bond is being strengthened and the formation of Biden’s foreign policy doctrine is being followed by a ‘grand-strategic’ shift. Four different models of transatlantic relations (mutual autonomy, strategic autonomy, strategic partnership, situational partnership) are discussed where variables include the approach taken by the USA to transatlantic relations, and the approach of Europe’s EU and NATO members to transatlantic relations are addressed. The main argument is that transatlantic relations during Biden’s mandate have constantly oscillated between a stra-tegic partnership, especially related to common goals of democracy promotion and containment and situ-ational partnership. Situations like the war in Ukraine have simultaneously acted to strengthen the American–European partnership based on the shared security and political interests.Keywords: transatlantic relations, reatlantisation, USA, Europe, Biden doctrine, war in Ukraine, strategic part-nership, situational partnership
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拜登主义与乌克兰战争:重新建立跨大西洋关系或战略与现实伙伴关系
乌克兰战争是几十年来对欧洲-大西洋地区和平的最重大威胁。在特朗普削弱跨大西洋关系4年后,拜登假定的外交政策原则包括快速更新或重新大西洋化。鉴于俄罗斯的侵略、跨大西洋关系的现状和当前的全球秩序结构,这篇文章对“新”遏制战略提出了质疑,即跨大西洋纽带正在加强,拜登外交政策学说的形成之后正在发生“大战略”转变。讨论了跨大西洋关系的四种不同模式(相互自主、战略自主、战略伙伴关系、情景伙伴关系),其中变量包括美国对跨大西洋关系采取的方法,以及欧洲欧盟和北约成员国对跨大西洋关系采取的方法。主要论点是,在拜登任期内,跨大西洋关系一直在战略伙伴关系之间摇摆不定,尤其是与促进和遏制民主的共同目标以及原位伙伴关系有关。乌克兰战争等局势同时加强了基于共同安全和政治利益的美欧伙伴关系。关键词:跨大西洋关系、重新部署、美国、欧洲、拜登学说、乌克兰战争、战略伙伴关系、态势伙伴关系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
TEORIJA IN PRAKSA
TEORIJA IN PRAKSA SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
EMOTIONAL LABOUR AND EMOTIONAL BURNOUT: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF SERVICE SECTOR EMPLOYEES INTERPELACIJA UČENCEV IN UČENK V NOSILCE ČLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC: RETORIČNA ANALIZA UČNE PRIPRAVE REGULATION OF THE USE OF FACIAL RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY –LIMITATIONS AND CHALLENGES FROM A HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE THE EFFECT OF GREENWASHING PERCEPTION, GREEN WORD OF MOUTH, AND GREEN MARKETING ON H&M PURCHASE INTENTIONS IN JAKARTA MANAGERSKE NAPOVEDI IN DEJANSKI UČINKI PANDEMIJE COVID-19 NA SLOVENSKA PODJETJA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1