Computer-Aided Design, 3-D-Printed Manufacturing, and Expert Validation of a High-fidelity Facial Flap Surgical Simulator.

A. Powell, S. Srinivasan, G. Green, Jennifer C. Kim, D. Zopf
{"title":"Computer-Aided Design, 3-D-Printed Manufacturing, and Expert Validation of a High-fidelity Facial Flap Surgical Simulator.","authors":"A. Powell, S. Srinivasan, G. Green, Jennifer C. Kim, D. Zopf","doi":"10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance\nFacial flap procedures may be difficult for surgical trainees to conceptualize and challenging for supervising surgeons to allow entrustment early in training. Simulation outside of the operating room may accelerate and enhance the surgical education experience.\n\n\nObjective\nTo design and manufacture a 3-dimensional (3-D)-printed, multilayer, anatomically accurate facial flap model for use in surgical education.\n\n\nDesign, Setting, and Participants\nIn this multicenter validation study, a 3-D-printed facial flap simulator was designed from a computed tomographic (CT) scan and manufactured for low-cost, high-fidelity simulation. Expert otolaryngology-head and neck surgeon feedback was acquired through surgical rehearsal and performance of 8 local facial flap procedures on the facial flap simulator by 7 otolaryngologists fellowship trained in facial plastic surgery.\n\n\nMain Outcomes and Measures\nLikert scale surveys were made based on evaluation criteria categorized into domains of realism, experience, and applicability of the simulator. Measures of central tendency, variability, and confidence intervals were generated to evaluate the outcomes.\n\n\nResults\nSeven expert otolaryngology-head and neck surgeons completed a Likert scale evaluation survey containing quantitative analysis of 6 questions on physical attributes, 12 questions on realism, 8 questions on experience, and 4 questions on the applicability of the simulator. All expert surgeons were additionally fellowship trained in facial plastic surgery with their mean years in practice being 11.9. Overall evaluation demonstrated valuable ability of the simulator for medical education with suggestions for future directions. Importantly, the simulator was rated on a scale of 1 (no value) to 4 (great value) as 3.86 as a training tool, 3.57 as a competency evaluation tool, and 3.43 as a rehearsal tool.\n\n\nConclusions and Revelance\nExpert experience with the local facial flap simulator was rated highly for realism, experience, performance, and usefulness. With slight refinement, the model has strong potential for broad use in training in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery and facial plastic surgery.\n\n\nLevel of Evidence\nNA.","PeriodicalId":14538,"journal":{"name":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0050","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Importance Facial flap procedures may be difficult for surgical trainees to conceptualize and challenging for supervising surgeons to allow entrustment early in training. Simulation outside of the operating room may accelerate and enhance the surgical education experience. Objective To design and manufacture a 3-dimensional (3-D)-printed, multilayer, anatomically accurate facial flap model for use in surgical education. Design, Setting, and Participants In this multicenter validation study, a 3-D-printed facial flap simulator was designed from a computed tomographic (CT) scan and manufactured for low-cost, high-fidelity simulation. Expert otolaryngology-head and neck surgeon feedback was acquired through surgical rehearsal and performance of 8 local facial flap procedures on the facial flap simulator by 7 otolaryngologists fellowship trained in facial plastic surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures Likert scale surveys were made based on evaluation criteria categorized into domains of realism, experience, and applicability of the simulator. Measures of central tendency, variability, and confidence intervals were generated to evaluate the outcomes. Results Seven expert otolaryngology-head and neck surgeons completed a Likert scale evaluation survey containing quantitative analysis of 6 questions on physical attributes, 12 questions on realism, 8 questions on experience, and 4 questions on the applicability of the simulator. All expert surgeons were additionally fellowship trained in facial plastic surgery with their mean years in practice being 11.9. Overall evaluation demonstrated valuable ability of the simulator for medical education with suggestions for future directions. Importantly, the simulator was rated on a scale of 1 (no value) to 4 (great value) as 3.86 as a training tool, 3.57 as a competency evaluation tool, and 3.43 as a rehearsal tool. Conclusions and Revelance Expert experience with the local facial flap simulator was rated highly for realism, experience, performance, and usefulness. With slight refinement, the model has strong potential for broad use in training in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery and facial plastic surgery. Level of Evidence NA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高保真面部皮瓣手术模拟器的计算机辅助设计、3D打印制造和专家验证。
重要的是,对于外科受训人员来说,面部皮瓣手术可能很难概念化,对于监督外科医生来说,在培训早期允许委托可能很有挑战性。手术室外的模拟可以加速和增强外科教育体验。目的设计和制作一种三维、多层、解剖准确的面部皮瓣模型,用于外科教育。设计、设置和参与者在这项多中心验证研究中,根据计算机断层扫描(CT)设计并制造了一个3D打印的面部皮瓣模拟器,用于低成本、高保真度的模拟。7名接受过面部整形外科培训的耳鼻喉科学者通过在皮瓣模拟器上进行8次局部皮瓣手术的手术排练和表演,获得了耳鼻咽喉头颈外科医生的专家反馈。主要结果和测量Likert量表调查是根据评估标准进行的,评估标准分为真实性、经验和模拟器的适用性。生成中心趋势、变异性和置信区间的测量值来评估结果。结果7名耳鼻咽喉头颈外科专家完成了Likert量表评估调查,包括6个物理属性问题、12个现实主义问题、8个经验问题和4个模拟器适用性问题的定量分析。所有专业外科医生都接受了面部整形外科的额外奖学金培训,他们的平均执业年限为11.9年。总体评估证明了模拟器在医学教育中的宝贵能力,并对未来的发展方向提出了建议。重要的是,模拟器的评分为1(无值)至4(大值),作为培训工具为3.86,作为能力评估工具为3.57,作为排练工具为3.43。结论和RevelanceExpert使用局部面部皮瓣模拟器的经验在真实性、经验、性能和实用性方面得到了高度评价。该模型经过轻微改进,在耳鼻咽喉头颈外科和面部整形外科的训练中具有广泛应用的潜力。证据等级NA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine (Formerly, JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery) is a multispecialty journal with a key mission to provide physicians and providers with the most accurate and innovative information in the discipline of facial plastic (reconstructive and cosmetic) interventions.
期刊最新文献
JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery. Clarification of a Suspension Technique for Unstable Nasal Bones. Masseteric-to-Facial Nerve Transfer and Selective Neurectomy for Rehabilitation of the Synkinetic Smile. A Practical Precaution Relevant to Facial Injections. Effect of a Vibratory Anesthetic Device on Pain Anticipation and Subsequent Pain Perception Among Patients Undergoing Cutaneous Cancer Removal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1