Exploring Variations of Hyperbole and Puffery in Advertising

L. Stern, Mark Callister
{"title":"Exploring Variations of Hyperbole and Puffery in Advertising","authors":"L. Stern, Mark Callister","doi":"10.1080/10641734.2019.1580230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This research explored whether hyperbole and puffery ads at two levels of intensity produced differential effects in contrast to nonexaggerated ads. An experiment had 597 subjects rate 1 of 20 ads on ad liking, product quality, deception, product-name recall, and buying intention. Hyperbole ads yielded the highest ad liking, perceived general product quality, and buying intention, along with the highest ratings of perceived deception, in contrast to puffery and control ads. Puffery did not distinguish itself from control ads, having little to no functional effect on common advertising outcome measures. Therefore, hyperbole may offer superior advertising outcomes compared to puffery.","PeriodicalId":43045,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Issues and Research In Advertising","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10641734.2019.1580230","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Issues and Research In Advertising","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2019.1580230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Abstract This research explored whether hyperbole and puffery ads at two levels of intensity produced differential effects in contrast to nonexaggerated ads. An experiment had 597 subjects rate 1 of 20 ads on ad liking, product quality, deception, product-name recall, and buying intention. Hyperbole ads yielded the highest ad liking, perceived general product quality, and buying intention, along with the highest ratings of perceived deception, in contrast to puffery and control ads. Puffery did not distinguish itself from control ads, having little to no functional effect on common advertising outcome measures. Therefore, hyperbole may offer superior advertising outcomes compared to puffery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
广告中夸张和夸张的变化探析
摘要本研究探讨了与非广告相比,两个强度级别的夸张和浮夸广告是否会产生不同的效果。一项实验让597名受试者在广告喜好、产品质量、欺骗、产品名称召回和购买意愿方面对20个广告中的1个进行评分。与夸张和对照广告相比,夸张广告产生了最高的广告好感度、感知的总体产品质量和购买意图,以及感知的欺骗的最高评级。puffery没有将自己与对照广告区分开来,对常见的广告结果测量几乎没有功能影响。因此,与夸夸其谈相比,夸张可能会带来更好的广告效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
32.40%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
The Lost History of the American Academy of Advertising Exploring Persuasion Knowledge, Identity-Related Media Use, and Ad Skepticism of Black Immigrant and Refugee Adolescents Exploring Anti-Asian Racism Activism on Twitter during the Early Era of COVID-19 Hate Crimes: Implications for Marketers’ Social Purpose Communication Strategy Corporate Account As a New Endorser Developing Parasocial Relationships with Customers Modeling the Effects of Streamer Characteristics and Platform Affordances in Livestreaming E-Commerce: A Mixed-Methods Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1