Which reduces the risk of cognitive impairment: physical activity or daytime nap?

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Psychogeriatrics Pub Date : 2022-06-05 DOI:10.1111/psyg.12864
T. Kawada
{"title":"Which reduces the risk of cognitive impairment: physical activity or daytime nap?","authors":"T. Kawada","doi":"10.1111/psyg.12864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dear Editor, Qian et al. conducted a cross-sectional study to investigate the association between three lifestyles and cognitive impairment (COI) in adults aged 60 years or older. The adjusted odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence intervals (CIs)) of tea consumption, physical activity for COI were 0.66 (0.48–0.90) and 0.79 (0.65–0.96), respectively. In addition, the adjusted OR (95% CI) of physical activity plus siesta for COI was 0.44 (0.31–0.64). Although almost all combinations of lifestyle factors had a significant negative association with COI, the adjusted OR of tea consumption plus siesta for COI did not reach the level of significance. Tea consumption and siesta are lifestyles without body movement, and physical activity may be indispensable to avoid COI. I present some information regarding siesta and cognition. Duan et al. conducted a prospective study to examine the association between sleep characteristics and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) incidence with special reference to apolipoprotein E polymorphism ε4 (APOEε4). The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) (95% CIs) of taking a nap at noon for MCI were 0.723 (0.592– 0.883) and 0.719 (0.576–0.897) in all participants and in APOEε4 non-carriers, respectively. They concluded that MCI was protected by nap regardless of APOEε4. Palpatzis et al. reported that the adjusted HR (95% CI) of daytime napping in middle-aged adults for dementia incidence was 1.67 (1.37–2.03). They also observed that the elevated dementia risk was observed regardless of genetic risk by APOE genotype. On this point, the effect of APOE on the association between sleep and incident dementia may differ in middle-aged people and older adults, because the effects of APOEε4 can vary with age and other factors. Furthermore, Riaz et al. reported that APOEε4 presented different risks of cognitive decline and dementia. Anyway, clinical outcome and age should be treated with caution, when APOEε4 is included for the analysis. Finally, Li et al. reported the association between daytime napping and subsequent risk of Alzheimer’s dementia. Longer and more frequent daytime naps were significantly associated with higher risk of Alzheimer’s dementia. In addition, there were bidirectional dose–response relationships between longer and/or more frequent daytime napping and worse levels of cognition. Causal association should be specified by further studies.","PeriodicalId":20784,"journal":{"name":"Psychogeriatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychogeriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyg.12864","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dear Editor, Qian et al. conducted a cross-sectional study to investigate the association between three lifestyles and cognitive impairment (COI) in adults aged 60 years or older. The adjusted odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence intervals (CIs)) of tea consumption, physical activity for COI were 0.66 (0.48–0.90) and 0.79 (0.65–0.96), respectively. In addition, the adjusted OR (95% CI) of physical activity plus siesta for COI was 0.44 (0.31–0.64). Although almost all combinations of lifestyle factors had a significant negative association with COI, the adjusted OR of tea consumption plus siesta for COI did not reach the level of significance. Tea consumption and siesta are lifestyles without body movement, and physical activity may be indispensable to avoid COI. I present some information regarding siesta and cognition. Duan et al. conducted a prospective study to examine the association between sleep characteristics and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) incidence with special reference to apolipoprotein E polymorphism ε4 (APOEε4). The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) (95% CIs) of taking a nap at noon for MCI were 0.723 (0.592– 0.883) and 0.719 (0.576–0.897) in all participants and in APOEε4 non-carriers, respectively. They concluded that MCI was protected by nap regardless of APOEε4. Palpatzis et al. reported that the adjusted HR (95% CI) of daytime napping in middle-aged adults for dementia incidence was 1.67 (1.37–2.03). They also observed that the elevated dementia risk was observed regardless of genetic risk by APOE genotype. On this point, the effect of APOE on the association between sleep and incident dementia may differ in middle-aged people and older adults, because the effects of APOEε4 can vary with age and other factors. Furthermore, Riaz et al. reported that APOEε4 presented different risks of cognitive decline and dementia. Anyway, clinical outcome and age should be treated with caution, when APOEε4 is included for the analysis. Finally, Li et al. reported the association between daytime napping and subsequent risk of Alzheimer’s dementia. Longer and more frequent daytime naps were significantly associated with higher risk of Alzheimer’s dementia. In addition, there were bidirectional dose–response relationships between longer and/or more frequent daytime napping and worse levels of cognition. Causal association should be specified by further studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哪一种能降低认知障碍的风险:体育活动还是白天小睡?
尊敬的编辑,钱等人进行了一项横断面研究,调查了60岁及以上成年人的三种生活方式与认知障碍(COI)之间的关系。茶消费量和COI体力活动的校正比值比(OR)(95%置信区间(CI))分别为0.66(0.48-0.90)和0.79(0.65-0.96)。此外,体育活动加午休对COI的校正OR(95%CI)为0.44(0.31–0.64)。尽管几乎所有生活方式因素的组合都与COI呈显著负相关,但喝茶加午休的校正OR对COI没有达到显著水平。喝茶和午休是没有身体运动的生活方式,为了避免COI,体育活动可能是必不可少的。我提供一些关于午睡和认知的信息。段等人进行了一项前瞻性研究,以检查睡眠特征与轻度认知障碍(MCI)发病率之间的关系,特别是参考载脂蛋白E多态性ε4(APOEε4)。所有参与者和APOEε4非携带者中午小睡MCI的调整后危险比(HR)(95%CI)分别为0.723(0.592–0.883)和0.719(0.576–0.897)。他们得出结论,无论APOEε4如何,MCI都受到nap的保护。Palpatzis等人报道,中年人白天打盹对痴呆症发病率的调整HR(95%CI)为1.67(1.37-2.03)。他们还观察到,无论APOE基因型的遗传风险如何,痴呆症风险都会升高。在这一点上,在中年人和老年人中,APOE对睡眠和痴呆事件之间关系的影响可能不同,因为APOEε4的影响可能随年龄和其他因素而变化。此外,Riaz等人报道,APOEε4表现出不同的认知能力下降和痴呆风险。无论如何,当APOEε4被纳入分析时,临床结果和年龄应谨慎对待。最后,李等人报道了日间小睡与阿尔茨海默痴呆症风险之间的关系。白天小睡时间越长、频率越高,患阿尔茨海默氏症的风险越高。此外,白天小睡时间更长和/或更频繁与认知水平较差之间存在双向剂量-反应关系。因果关系应通过进一步研究加以明确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychogeriatrics
Psychogeriatrics Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychogeriatrics is an international journal sponsored by the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society and publishes peer-reviewed original papers dealing with all aspects of psychogeriatrics and related fields The Journal encourages articles with gerontopsychiatric, neurobiological, genetic, diagnostic, social-psychiatric, health-political, psychological or psychotherapeutic content. Themes can be illuminated through basic science, clinical (human and animal) studies, case studies, epidemiological or humanistic research
期刊最新文献
Longitudinal relationship between loneliness and cognitive function among unmarried older adults in Malaysia: exploring gender disparities Low‐dose lamotrigine induces Pisa syndrome in a patient with probable corticobasal degeneration despite previous use Reply to ‘The clinical application value of psychological nursing intervention for patients with prostatic hyperplasia during treatment’ Beyond the stethoscope: ageism in white coats and resident physicians' preferences for elderly patient care Validity and reliability of the Checklist for Habitual Physical Activity for people 75 years and older in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1