Pui Him Ip, Origen and the Emergence of Divine Simplicity before Nicaea (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2022), pp. xx + 276. $85.00

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-05-15 DOI:10.1017/S0036930623000194
Grayden McCashen
{"title":"Pui Him Ip, Origen and the Emergence of Divine Simplicity before Nicaea (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2022), pp. xx + 276. $85.00","authors":"Grayden McCashen","doi":"10.1017/S0036930623000194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This book is a revision of Ip ’ s Cambridge dissertation, which was overseen by Rowan Williams, the author of the book ’ s foreword. It nuances the doctrine of divine simplicity for modern systematic and philosophical theology, where simplicity is often understood in pro-Nicene/Augustinian or Aristotelian-Thomistic terms, by elucidating its historical development from Plato ’ s Republic through Origen. The two chief insights of this historical study are, first, that divine simplicity came to be formed and accepted in Christian theological discourse as a doctrine with ethical as well as metaphysical significance, and, second, that while modern commentators have seen the doctrine as inevit-ably leading to modalism, its historical development was in fact in opposition to the analogous third-century theology, Monarchianism. This book ’ s seven chapters have a tripartite structure, covering the philosophical background of divine simplicity (chapters 1 – 2), simplicity and trinitarian theology (here specifically, ‘ the nature of the Father-Son relation ’ rather than ‘“ fully Trinitarian ” theologies ’ [p.49]) before Origen (chapters 3 – 4) and finally, Origen ’ s the-ology (chapters 5 – 7). Chapter 1 is a narrow but able discussion of simplicity in Plato, focusing on the locus classicus of divine simplicity in Plato ’ s corpus, which Ip maintains is Republic 380d","PeriodicalId":44026,"journal":{"name":"SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY","volume":"76 1","pages":"299 - 300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0036930623000194","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This book is a revision of Ip ’ s Cambridge dissertation, which was overseen by Rowan Williams, the author of the book ’ s foreword. It nuances the doctrine of divine simplicity for modern systematic and philosophical theology, where simplicity is often understood in pro-Nicene/Augustinian or Aristotelian-Thomistic terms, by elucidating its historical development from Plato ’ s Republic through Origen. The two chief insights of this historical study are, first, that divine simplicity came to be formed and accepted in Christian theological discourse as a doctrine with ethical as well as metaphysical significance, and, second, that while modern commentators have seen the doctrine as inevit-ably leading to modalism, its historical development was in fact in opposition to the analogous third-century theology, Monarchianism. This book ’ s seven chapters have a tripartite structure, covering the philosophical background of divine simplicity (chapters 1 – 2), simplicity and trinitarian theology (here specifically, ‘ the nature of the Father-Son relation ’ rather than ‘“ fully Trinitarian ” theologies ’ [p.49]) before Origen (chapters 3 – 4) and finally, Origen ’ s the-ology (chapters 5 – 7). Chapter 1 is a narrow but able discussion of simplicity in Plato, focusing on the locus classicus of divine simplicity in Plato ’ s corpus, which Ip maintains is Republic 380d
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蒲,《奥里金与尼西亚之前神圣简单的出现》(圣母院,IN:圣母大学出版社,2022),第xx+276页$85
这本书是对叶的剑桥论文的修订,该论文由该书前言的作者罗温·威廉姆斯主持。它通过阐明从柏拉图的《理想国》到奥里金的历史发展,对现代系统和哲学神学的神圣简单性学说进行了细微的区分,在现代系统和哲学家神学中,简单性通常用亲尼西亚/奥古斯丁或亚里士多德的托米斯主义术语来理解。这项历史研究的两个主要见解是,首先,神圣的简单性在基督教神学话语中形成并被接受为一种具有伦理和形而上学意义的学说,其次,尽管现代评论家认为这种学说无能地导致了模态主义,它的历史发展事实上与类似的三世纪神学君主主义是对立的。这本书的七章有三重结构,涵盖了神的简单性(第1-2章)、简单性和三位一体神学的哲学背景(这里特别是“父子关系的本质”,而不是“完全三位一体”的神学[第49页])在奥里金之前(第3-4章),最后是奥里金的神学(第5-7章)。第一章是对柏拉图的朴素性的狭义而干练的论述,主要集中在柏拉图文集中神圣朴素的经典轨迹上,叶认为这是理想国380d
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
期刊最新文献
Eschatological naturalism and ecological responsibility: Troubling some assumptions Apocalyptic praxis in Evagrius of Pontus and Francis of Assisi Beyond text to God: Bonaventure's transformation of exegetical method from his Breviloquium to Itinerarium mentis in Deum (1257–1259) ‘The visible renewal of human life’: Barth's ethical assessment of the Reformed confessions The beauty of the body and the ascension: A reclamation and subversion of physical beauty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1