Detection of SARS-CoV-2 contamination in the operating room and birthing room setting: a cross-sectional study

CMAJ open Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20210321
Patricia E. Lee, Robert Kozak, Nasrin Alavi, H. Mbareche, R. Kung, K. Murphy, Darian L. Perruzza, S. Jarvi, Elsa Salvant, N. Ladhani, A. Yee, L. Gagnon, R. Jenkinson, Grace Y. Liu
{"title":"Detection of SARS-CoV-2 contamination in the operating room and birthing room setting: a cross-sectional study","authors":"Patricia E. Lee, Robert Kozak, Nasrin Alavi, H. Mbareche, R. Kung, K. Murphy, Darian L. Perruzza, S. Jarvi, Elsa Salvant, N. Ladhani, A. Yee, L. Gagnon, R. Jenkinson, Grace Y. Liu","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20210321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The exposure risks to front-line health care workers caring for patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection undergoing surgery or obstetric delivery are unclear, and an understanding of sample types that may harbour virus is important for evaluating risk. We sought to determine whether SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA from patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection undergoing surgery or obstetric delivery was present in the peritoneal cavity of male and female patients, in the female reproductive tract, in the environment of the surgery or delivery suite (surgical instruments or equipment used, air or floors), and inside the masks of the attending health care workers. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study from November 2020 to May 2021 at 2 tertiary academic Toronto hospitals, during urgent surgeries or obstetric deliveries for patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in patient, environmental and air samples was identified by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Air samples were collected using both active and passive sampling techniques. The primary outcome was the proportion of health care workers’ masks positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. We included adult patients with positive RT-PCR nasal swab undergoing obstetric delivery or urgent surgery (from across all surgical specialties). Results: A total of 32 patients (age 20–88 yr) were included. Nine patients had obstetric deliveries (6 cesarean deliveries), and 23 patients (14 male) required urgent surgery from the orthopedic or trauma, general surgery, burn, plastic surgery, cardiac surgery, neurosurgery, vascular surgery, gastroenterology and gynecologic oncology divisions. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in 20 of 332 (6%) patient and environmental samples collected: 4 of 24 (17%) patient samples, 5 of 60 (8%) floor samples, 1 of 54 (2%) air samples, 10 of 23 (43%) surgical instrument or equipment samples, 0 of 24 cautery filter samples and 0 of 143 (95% confidence interval 0–0.026) inner surface of mask samples. Interpretation: During the study period of November 2020 to May 2021, we found evidence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a small but important number of samples obtained in the surgical and obstetric operative environment. The finding of no detectable virus inside the masks worn by the health care teams would suggest a low risk of infection for health care workers using appropriate personal protective equipment.","PeriodicalId":93946,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ open","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: The exposure risks to front-line health care workers caring for patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection undergoing surgery or obstetric delivery are unclear, and an understanding of sample types that may harbour virus is important for evaluating risk. We sought to determine whether SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA from patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection undergoing surgery or obstetric delivery was present in the peritoneal cavity of male and female patients, in the female reproductive tract, in the environment of the surgery or delivery suite (surgical instruments or equipment used, air or floors), and inside the masks of the attending health care workers. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study from November 2020 to May 2021 at 2 tertiary academic Toronto hospitals, during urgent surgeries or obstetric deliveries for patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in patient, environmental and air samples was identified by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Air samples were collected using both active and passive sampling techniques. The primary outcome was the proportion of health care workers’ masks positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. We included adult patients with positive RT-PCR nasal swab undergoing obstetric delivery or urgent surgery (from across all surgical specialties). Results: A total of 32 patients (age 20–88 yr) were included. Nine patients had obstetric deliveries (6 cesarean deliveries), and 23 patients (14 male) required urgent surgery from the orthopedic or trauma, general surgery, burn, plastic surgery, cardiac surgery, neurosurgery, vascular surgery, gastroenterology and gynecologic oncology divisions. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in 20 of 332 (6%) patient and environmental samples collected: 4 of 24 (17%) patient samples, 5 of 60 (8%) floor samples, 1 of 54 (2%) air samples, 10 of 23 (43%) surgical instrument or equipment samples, 0 of 24 cautery filter samples and 0 of 143 (95% confidence interval 0–0.026) inner surface of mask samples. Interpretation: During the study period of November 2020 to May 2021, we found evidence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a small but important number of samples obtained in the surgical and obstetric operative environment. The finding of no detectable virus inside the masks worn by the health care teams would suggest a low risk of infection for health care workers using appropriate personal protective equipment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在手术室和产房环境中检测严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型污染:一项横断面研究
背景:护理正在接受手术或产科分娩的严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染患者的一线医护人员的暴露风险尚不清楚,了解可能携带病毒的样本类型对于评估风险很重要。我们试图确定接受手术或产科分娩的严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染患者的严重急性呼吸道综合征病毒2型RNA是否存在于男性和女性患者的腹膜腔、女性生殖道、手术或分娩室的环境中(使用的手术器械或设备、空气或地板),以及在医护人员的口罩内。方法:我们于2020年11月至2021年5月在多伦多的两家三级学院医院进行了一项横断面研究,为严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染患者进行紧急手术或产科分娩。通过实时逆转录聚合酶链式反应(RT-PCR)鉴定患者、环境和空气样本中是否存在严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型病毒RNA。使用主动和被动采样技术采集空气样本。主要结果是医护人员口罩中严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型核糖核酸阳性的比例。我们纳入了接受产科分娩或紧急手术(来自所有外科专业)的RT-PCR鼻拭子阳性的成年患者。结果:共纳入32名患者(年龄20-88岁)。9名患者进行了产科分娩(6名剖宫产),23名患者(14名男性)需要骨科或创伤科、普通外科、烧伤科、整形外科、心脏外科、神经外科、血管外科、胃肠科和妇科肿瘤科的紧急手术。在332份(6%)患者和环境样本中,有20份检测到严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型核糖核酸:24份(17%)患者样本中有4份,60份(8%)地板样本中有5份,54份(2%)空气样本中有1份,23份(43%)外科器械或设备样本中有10份,24份烧灼过滤器样本中有0份,口罩样本内表面143份(95%置信区间0–0.026)中有0个。解释:在2020年11月至2021年5月的研究期间,我们在外科和产科手术环境中获得的少量但重要的样本中发现了严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型RNA的证据。在医护团队佩戴的口罩内没有发现可检测到的病毒,这表明使用适当个人防护设备的医护人员感染的风险很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to "Validity of diagnoses of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Canadian administrative health data: a multiprovince, population-based cohort study". Neighbourhood deprivation, distance to nearest comprehensive stroke centre and access to endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke: a population-based study. Social determinants of access to timely elective surgery in Ontario, Canada: a cross-sectional population level study. The success of publicly funded rotavirus vaccine programs for preventing community- and hospital-acquired rotavirus infections in Canadian pediatric hospitals: an observational study. Trends in hospital coding for people experiencing homelessness in Canada, 2015-2020: a descriptive study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1