Efficacy in COVID-19 management: the case of ASEAN

IF 2.4 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Transforming Government- People Process and Policy Pub Date : 2022-06-02 DOI:10.1108/tg-12-2021-0203
Yoong-Hon Lee, Sheau Yen Ruth Lim
{"title":"Efficacy in COVID-19 management: the case of ASEAN","authors":"Yoong-Hon Lee, Sheau Yen Ruth Lim","doi":"10.1108/tg-12-2021-0203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have been devastating to countries around the world. Much of the problem has been the need to contain the infection via harsh social movement restrictions while having the necessary policies to cushion the ensuing economic blows that follow them. This study aims to look at The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries and assess the good practices that are associated with those which performed relatively better than the rest.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors use data envelopment analysis (DEA) to identify the most efficient country among the ASEAN nations in dealing with the pandemic and observe their practices with regard to the movement control metrics.\n\n\nFindings\nOne particular country stood out in this regard, which is Singapore. The authors observed that its social restrictions were less stringent than many others yet its management of the pandemic has been highly successful despite having had the highest number of cases at one stage in 2020. This suggests massive lockdowns may not necessarily be the solution. However, the nation did place a high priority in having a high-income support, effective public campaigning and very restrictive policy on public events. In terms of originality and value, this paper uses DEA in identifying the best practice among ASEAN countries in dealing with the pandemic, both from an economic and medical perspectives.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, no other papers have used this approach. The authors hope the findings can be of some value to policymakers in designing better (public) policies when it comes to dealing with pandemics in the future.\n","PeriodicalId":51696,"journal":{"name":"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-12-2021-0203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have been devastating to countries around the world. Much of the problem has been the need to contain the infection via harsh social movement restrictions while having the necessary policies to cushion the ensuing economic blows that follow them. This study aims to look at The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries and assess the good practices that are associated with those which performed relatively better than the rest. Design/methodology/approach The authors use data envelopment analysis (DEA) to identify the most efficient country among the ASEAN nations in dealing with the pandemic and observe their practices with regard to the movement control metrics. Findings One particular country stood out in this regard, which is Singapore. The authors observed that its social restrictions were less stringent than many others yet its management of the pandemic has been highly successful despite having had the highest number of cases at one stage in 2020. This suggests massive lockdowns may not necessarily be the solution. However, the nation did place a high priority in having a high-income support, effective public campaigning and very restrictive policy on public events. In terms of originality and value, this paper uses DEA in identifying the best practice among ASEAN countries in dealing with the pandemic, both from an economic and medical perspectives. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no other papers have used this approach. The authors hope the findings can be of some value to policymakers in designing better (public) policies when it comes to dealing with pandemics in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎管理的有效性:以东盟为例
目的新冠肺炎大流行对世界各国造成了毁灭性的影响。大部分问题是需要通过严格的社会行动限制来控制感染,同时制定必要的政策来缓解随之而来的经济打击。这项研究旨在观察东南亚国家联盟(东盟)国家,并评估与那些表现相对好于其他国家的国家相关的良好做法。设计/方法/方法作者使用数据包络分析(DEA)来确定东盟国家中应对疫情最有效的国家,并观察他们的做法关于运动控制度量。发现有一个国家在这方面很突出,那就是新加坡。作者观察到,它的社会限制没有其他许多国家那么严格,但它对疫情的管理非常成功,尽管它在2020年的某个阶段出现了最高的病例数。这表明大规模封锁可能不一定是解决方案。然而,国家确实高度重视高收入的支持、有效的公共竞选活动和对公共活动的严格限制政策。就原创性和价值而言,本文使用DEA从经济和医学角度确定了东盟国家应对疫情的最佳做法。原创性/价值据作者所知,没有其他论文使用过这种方法。作者希望这些发现对政策制定者在未来应对流行病时设计更好的(公共)政策具有一定价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transforming Government- People Process and Policy
Transforming Government- People Process and Policy INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Flawed charts in pension fund popular reports Public trust and collaborative e-governance performance: a study on government institutions and services Automation in public sector jobs and services: a framework to analyze public digital transformation’s impact in a data-constrained environment Digital inclusion for all? A gender-disaggregated analysis of e-government service use in Indonesia Measuring the effects of electronic government services and corrupt practices on information exchange: a comparison of public and private hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1