Inclusionary Emergency Management Planning: Floridian Emergency Management Planners’ Orientations and Perceptions

Q2 Social Sciences State and Local Government Review Pub Date : 2023-05-06 DOI:10.1177/0160323X231171731
C. Knox, Jason D. Rivera
{"title":"Inclusionary Emergency Management Planning: Floridian Emergency Management Planners’ Orientations and Perceptions","authors":"C. Knox, Jason D. Rivera","doi":"10.1177/0160323X231171731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The need for effective inclusionary planning practices is paramount in the whole community approach within emergency management. However, accountability, legitimacy, bureaucratic discretion, and a planner’s perspective on public involvement can limit the ability to effectively include the public in emergency management planning processes. Through survey and focus group analysis of county-level emergency management planners in Florida, this preliminary study explores the implications of these factors for effectively engaging in democratic policy and planning development within the realm of emergency management. We provide recommendations for practitioners attempting to engage the public and suggestions for future research.","PeriodicalId":52260,"journal":{"name":"State and Local Government Review","volume":"55 1","pages":"192 - 212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"State and Local Government Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X231171731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The need for effective inclusionary planning practices is paramount in the whole community approach within emergency management. However, accountability, legitimacy, bureaucratic discretion, and a planner’s perspective on public involvement can limit the ability to effectively include the public in emergency management planning processes. Through survey and focus group analysis of county-level emergency management planners in Florida, this preliminary study explores the implications of these factors for effectively engaging in democratic policy and planning development within the realm of emergency management. We provide recommendations for practitioners attempting to engage the public and suggestions for future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
包容性应急管理规划:佛罗里达州应急管理规划人员的定位和认知
在应急管理的整个社区方法中,有效的包容性规划实践的必要性至关重要。然而,问责制、合法性、官僚自由裁量权和规划者对公众参与的看法可能会限制将公众有效纳入应急管理规划过程的能力。通过对佛罗里达州县级应急管理规划者的调查和焦点小组分析,本初步研究探讨了这些因素对有效参与应急管理领域的民主政策和规划制定的影响。我们为试图吸引公众的从业者提供建议,并为未来的研究提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
State and Local Government Review
State and Local Government Review Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
State Partisan Dominance and the Distribution of TANF Funds, 2000–2018 Policy Learning and the Diffusion of Autonomous Vehicle Policy in the American States Political Drivers of State Fiscal Cyclicality She Said Yes! An Exploration of Confidence Among Women Who Run for Political Office Do Local Fiscal Decisions Impact Economic Growth: The Case of Wisconsin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1