Digital Workout Versus Team Training: The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Athletes

Friedemann Schneider, A. Runer, F. Burkert, Jesse Seilern und Aspang, S. Reider, H. Schneider, E. Pocecco
{"title":"Digital Workout Versus Team Training: The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Athletes","authors":"Friedemann Schneider, A. Runer, F. Burkert, Jesse Seilern und Aspang, S. Reider, H. Schneider, E. Pocecco","doi":"10.1055/a-1734-5457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to assess the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on sport practice and to identify measures adopted by individuals and sports organizations to allow a safe return to community sports. An electronic survey was launched worldwide in June 2020 in the German and English languages. The questionnaire collected anonymous data on sporting activity before, during, and after pandemic-induced confinement. Participants classified themselves as either recreational, competitive, or professional sports level athletes. A total of 1336 adults (30.5±11.7 years; 54.0% women) participated in the survey; 68.5% were active athletes, 10.1% coaches, 2.1% officials and 4.3% related medical staff, 3.6% had another function, and 11.4% indicated no regular sports activity. Most participants practiced their sport in Europe (93.8%); the majority (61.0%) was amateur athletes. During confinement, 15.7% could perform their main sport unrestricted, 43.5% stated a reduced amount of time spent on sporting activities, 46.4% a reduced intensity level. Most participants (77.5%) were neither aware of screening measures nor of guidelines for dealing with infected athletes (80.0%) or for return to sports after a coronavirus infection (88.6%). Preventive measures mentioned included basic hygiene, measures to reduce personal contacts or virus transmission, or to improve traceability of infections. During confinement, a higher age (p=0.004) and training in a club setting (p<0.001) were associated with reduced sporting activity, while the availability of online training (p=0.030 ) was linked to both increased extent and intensity levels. A lower age (p=0.001) and recreational sports level (p=0.005) were associated with decreased activity after confinement. Although isolation can be necessary to protect public health, it alters the amount and intensity of physical activity.","PeriodicalId":74857,"journal":{"name":"Sports medicine international open","volume":"6 1","pages":"E18 - E24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports medicine international open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1734-5457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on sport practice and to identify measures adopted by individuals and sports organizations to allow a safe return to community sports. An electronic survey was launched worldwide in June 2020 in the German and English languages. The questionnaire collected anonymous data on sporting activity before, during, and after pandemic-induced confinement. Participants classified themselves as either recreational, competitive, or professional sports level athletes. A total of 1336 adults (30.5±11.7 years; 54.0% women) participated in the survey; 68.5% were active athletes, 10.1% coaches, 2.1% officials and 4.3% related medical staff, 3.6% had another function, and 11.4% indicated no regular sports activity. Most participants practiced their sport in Europe (93.8%); the majority (61.0%) was amateur athletes. During confinement, 15.7% could perform their main sport unrestricted, 43.5% stated a reduced amount of time spent on sporting activities, 46.4% a reduced intensity level. Most participants (77.5%) were neither aware of screening measures nor of guidelines for dealing with infected athletes (80.0%) or for return to sports after a coronavirus infection (88.6%). Preventive measures mentioned included basic hygiene, measures to reduce personal contacts or virus transmission, or to improve traceability of infections. During confinement, a higher age (p=0.004) and training in a club setting (p<0.001) were associated with reduced sporting activity, while the availability of online training (p=0.030 ) was linked to both increased extent and intensity levels. A lower age (p=0.001) and recreational sports level (p=0.005) were associated with decreased activity after confinement. Although isolation can be necessary to protect public health, it alters the amount and intensity of physical activity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字化训练与团队训练:新冠肺炎疫情对运动员的影响
该研究的目的是评估新冠肺炎大流行对体育实践的影响,并确定个人和体育组织为安全重返社区体育而采取的措施。2020年6月,一项以德语和英语进行的电子调查在全球范围内启动。该问卷收集了疫情导致的禁闭之前、期间和之后的体育活动的匿名数据。参与者将自己分为娱乐性、竞技性或职业体育级别的运动员。共有1336名成年人(30.5±11.7岁;54.0%为女性)参加了调查;68.5%的人是现役运动员,10.1%的人是教练,2.1%的人是官员,4.3%的人是相关医务人员,3.6%的人有其他功能,11.4%的人表示没有定期的体育活动。大多数参与者在欧洲进行体育锻炼(93.8%);业余运动员占绝大多数(61.0%)。在禁闭期间,15.7%的人可以不受限制地进行主要运动,43.5%的人表示减少了体育活动的时间,46.4%的人表示强度降低。大多数参与者(77.5%)既不知道筛查措施,也不知道处理受感染运动员(80.0%)或感染冠状病毒后重返赛场的指导方针(88.6%)。提到的预防措施包括基本卫生、减少个人接触或病毒传播的措施,或提高感染的可追溯性。在禁闭期间,较高的年龄(p=0.004)和在俱乐部环境中的训练(p<0.001)与运动活动减少有关,而在线训练的可用性(p=0.030)与范围和强度水平的增加有关。较低的年龄(p=0.001)和娱乐性运动水平(p=0.005)与禁闭后活动减少有关。尽管隔离对保护公众健康是必要的,但它会改变体育活动的数量和强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Win Your Race Goal: A Generalized Approach to Prediction of Running Performance. Effect of Lower Limb Muscle Fatigue on Dynamic Balance Performance in Healthy Young Adults: Role of Arm Movement. Effects of Exercise-Induced Changes in Myokine Expression on the Tumor Microenvironment. One year of heavy resistance training modifies muscle fiber characteristics in elderly Comparison of Neuromuscular Fatigue in Powerlifting Paralympics in Different Training Methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1