Risk factors of lymph node metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer in T3 and T4

Yuan Guo, Yunlong Li, Long Zhang, Zhen-Ying Du, Rui-zhong Gao, Leon Chen, Jipeng Li
{"title":"Risk factors of lymph node metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer in T3 and T4","authors":"Yuan Guo, Yunlong Li, Long Zhang, Zhen-Ying Du, Rui-zhong Gao, Leon Chen, Jipeng Li","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.CN115355-20190405-00125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the risk factors of lymph node metastasis for patients with colorectal cancer in T3 and T4, and to provide a reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment. \n \n \nMethods \nThe clinicopathological data of 1 112 patients with colorectal cancer in T3 and T4 who underwent radical resection of colorectal cancer in Xijing Digestive Disease Hospital from January 2008 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The correlation between lymph node metastasis status and the clinicopathological factors as well as tumor markers was analyzed. The related risk factors of lymph node metastasis were analyzed by using logistic multivariate regression analysis. \n \n \nResults \nUnivariate analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of lymph node metastasis among colorectal cancer patients stratified by gender, age and tumor location (all P > 0.05). The different tumor diameter [<5 cm and ≥5 cm: 37.75% (211/559), 52.26% (289/553), χ2 = 23.666, P < 0.01], general type [infiltration, ulcer, parasol, bulge: 37.04% (20/54), 47.52% (432/909), 34.33% (23/67), 69.51% (57/82), χ2 = 13.787, P = 0.003], degree of differentiation [highly-differentiated, moderately-differentiated, poorly-differentiated: 34.11% (102/299), 49.00% (317/647), 48.80% (81/166), χ2 = 19.771, P < 0.01], mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) [yes and no: 26.34% (64/243), 50.17% (436/869), χ2 = 43.996, P < 0.01], neurological invasion [yes and no: 48.17% (421/874), 33.20% (79/238), χ2 = 16.954, P < 0.01], vascular invasion [yes and no: 79.16% (338/427), 23.65% (162/685), χ2 = 327.493, P < 0.01] and preoperative carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) [positive (≥5 mg/ml) and negative (<5 mg/ml): 52.87% (249/471), 39.16% (251/641), χ2 = 20.162, P < 0.01] and CA199 [positive (≥35 U/ml) and negative (<35 U/ml): 59.33% (124/209), 41.64% (376/903), χ2 = 21.465, P < 0.01] had statistically significant differences in the incidence of lymph node metastasis for above stratified patients. Logistic multivariate regression analysis showed that vascular invasion and preoperative CA199-positive were independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer in T3 and T4 (OR = 13.006, 95% CI 9.329-17.276, P < 0.01; OR = 2.194, 95% CI 1.513-3.181, P < 0.01), and dMMR-positive was a protective factor for lymph node metastasis (OR = 0.279, 95% CI 0.190-0.411, P < 0.01). \n \n \nConclusions \nVascular invasion is the main risk affecting factor for the lymph node metastasis of patients with colorectal cancer in T3 and T4. The detection of preoperative tumor marker CA199 can be used as an index to predict the lymph node metastasis of patients with colorectal cancer in T3 and T4. To a certain extent, it can provide a reference for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with colorectal cancer in T3 and T4. \n \n \nKey words: \nColorectal neoplasms; Lymphatic metastasis; Risk factors","PeriodicalId":9505,"journal":{"name":"肿瘤研究与临床","volume":"32 1","pages":"161-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"肿瘤研究与临床","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN115355-20190405-00125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To investigate the risk factors of lymph node metastasis for patients with colorectal cancer in T3 and T4, and to provide a reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Methods The clinicopathological data of 1 112 patients with colorectal cancer in T3 and T4 who underwent radical resection of colorectal cancer in Xijing Digestive Disease Hospital from January 2008 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The correlation between lymph node metastasis status and the clinicopathological factors as well as tumor markers was analyzed. The related risk factors of lymph node metastasis were analyzed by using logistic multivariate regression analysis. Results Univariate analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of lymph node metastasis among colorectal cancer patients stratified by gender, age and tumor location (all P > 0.05). The different tumor diameter [<5 cm and ≥5 cm: 37.75% (211/559), 52.26% (289/553), χ2 = 23.666, P < 0.01], general type [infiltration, ulcer, parasol, bulge: 37.04% (20/54), 47.52% (432/909), 34.33% (23/67), 69.51% (57/82), χ2 = 13.787, P = 0.003], degree of differentiation [highly-differentiated, moderately-differentiated, poorly-differentiated: 34.11% (102/299), 49.00% (317/647), 48.80% (81/166), χ2 = 19.771, P < 0.01], mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) [yes and no: 26.34% (64/243), 50.17% (436/869), χ2 = 43.996, P < 0.01], neurological invasion [yes and no: 48.17% (421/874), 33.20% (79/238), χ2 = 16.954, P < 0.01], vascular invasion [yes and no: 79.16% (338/427), 23.65% (162/685), χ2 = 327.493, P < 0.01] and preoperative carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) [positive (≥5 mg/ml) and negative (<5 mg/ml): 52.87% (249/471), 39.16% (251/641), χ2 = 20.162, P < 0.01] and CA199 [positive (≥35 U/ml) and negative (<35 U/ml): 59.33% (124/209), 41.64% (376/903), χ2 = 21.465, P < 0.01] had statistically significant differences in the incidence of lymph node metastasis for above stratified patients. Logistic multivariate regression analysis showed that vascular invasion and preoperative CA199-positive were independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer in T3 and T4 (OR = 13.006, 95% CI 9.329-17.276, P < 0.01; OR = 2.194, 95% CI 1.513-3.181, P < 0.01), and dMMR-positive was a protective factor for lymph node metastasis (OR = 0.279, 95% CI 0.190-0.411, P < 0.01). Conclusions Vascular invasion is the main risk affecting factor for the lymph node metastasis of patients with colorectal cancer in T3 and T4. The detection of preoperative tumor marker CA199 can be used as an index to predict the lymph node metastasis of patients with colorectal cancer in T3 and T4. To a certain extent, it can provide a reference for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with colorectal cancer in T3 and T4. Key words: Colorectal neoplasms; Lymphatic metastasis; Risk factors
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症患者T3、T4淋巴结转移危险因素分析
目的探讨癌症T3、T4淋巴结转移的危险因素,为临床诊断和治疗提供参考。方法回顾性分析2008年1月至2017年12月在西京消化病医院行结直肠癌癌症根治性切除术的1 112例T3、T4大肠癌患者的临床病理资料。分析淋巴结转移状况与临床病理因素及肿瘤标志物的相关性。采用logistic多元回归分析法分析淋巴结转移的相关危险因素。结果单因素分析显示,癌症患者淋巴结转移发生率按性别、年龄和肿瘤部位划分,差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05),不同肿瘤直径(<5cm和≥5cm)分别为37.75%(211/559)、52.26%(289/553)、,一般型[浸润、溃疡、阳伞、隆起:37.04%(20/54)、47.52%(432/909)、34.33%(23/67)、69.51%(57/82),χ2=13.787,P=0.003],分化程度[高分化、中分化、低分化:34.11%(102/299)、49.00%(317/647)、48.80%(81/166),χ0=19.771,P<0.01],错配修复缺陷(dMMR)[是与否:26.34%(64/243),50.17%(436/869),χ2=43.996,P<0.01],神经系统侵犯[是与非:48.17%(421/874),33.20%(79/238),χ0=16.954,P<0.01],血管侵犯[是和否:79.16%(338/427),23.65%(162/685),χ2=327.493,P<0.01]和术前癌胚抗原(CEA)[阳性(≥5 mg/ml)和阴性(<5 mg/ml):52.87%(249/471),39.16%(251/641),χ0=20.162,P<0.01],CA199[阳性(≤35 U/ml)和阴性0.01]具有统计学意义上述分层患者淋巴结转移发生率的差异。Logistic多元回归分析显示,术前CA199阳性和血管侵犯是结直肠癌患者T3、T4淋巴结转移的独立危险因素(OR=13.006,95%CI 9.329-17.276,P<0.01;OR=2.194,95%CI 1.513-3.181,P<0.01),dMMR阳性是淋巴结转移的保护因素(OR=0.279,95%CI 0.190-0.411,P<0.01)。术前肿瘤标志物CA199的检测可作为预测结直肠癌患者T3、T4淋巴结转移的指标。在一定程度上可以为结直肠癌患者T3、T4的诊断和治疗提供参考。关键词:结直肠肿瘤;淋巴结转移;风险因素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
肿瘤研究与临床
肿瘤研究与临床 Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7737
期刊介绍: "Cancer Research and Clinic" is a series of magazines of the Chinese Medical Association under the supervision of the National Health Commission and sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association. It mainly reflects scientific research results and academic trends in the field of malignant tumors. The main columns include monographs, guidelines and consensus, standards and norms, treatises, short treatises, survey reports, reviews, clinical pathology (case) discussions, case reports, etc. The readers are middle- and senior-level medical staff engaged in basic research and clinical work on malignant tumors.
期刊最新文献
Progress of the relationship between breast cancer and thyroid diseases Analysis of cancer incidence and mortality in registration areas of Shanxi Province in 2014 Expressions of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 in recurrent patients after radical gastrectomy and its significance Progress of molecular markers related to papillary thyroid carcinoma Significance of changes of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1