Introduction from Altered Man: The History of Race and Degeneration from the Seventeenth to the Nineteenth Century

IF 1.3 Q2 ETHNIC STUDIES Critical Philosophy of Race Pub Date : 2021-06-18 DOI:10.5325/critphilrace.9.2.0179
Claude-Olivier Doron, Nicholard Anthony Eppert
{"title":"Introduction from Altered Man: The History of Race and Degeneration from the Seventeenth to the Nineteenth Century","authors":"Claude-Olivier Doron, Nicholard Anthony Eppert","doi":"10.5325/critphilrace.9.2.0179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article includes Nicholas Anthony Eppert's English translation of the introduction from Claude-Olivier Doron's L'homme altèrè: races et dégénérescence (XVII–XIX siècles), published in French in 2016. Inspired by a Foucauldian methodology, Doron provides a novel way to approach the historiography and philosophy of race and racism. Rather than focusing on traditional ways to conceptualize race, through alterity, and racism as emerging from polygenist theories that saw races as issuing from different origins and thwarting the idea of the unity of the human species, Doron argues that race is originally linked to theories of degeneration, and can be expressed through the concept of alteration. This allows him to envisage how discursive practices of race and racism and apparatuses of power that seek to govern race operate under theories of monogenism, which take the human species as a singular unity, and under the juridico-legal and metaphysical banner of \"humanity\" or \"the universal.\"","PeriodicalId":43337,"journal":{"name":"Critical Philosophy of Race","volume":"9 1","pages":"179 - 239"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Philosophy of Race","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/critphilrace.9.2.0179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article includes Nicholas Anthony Eppert's English translation of the introduction from Claude-Olivier Doron's L'homme altèrè: races et dégénérescence (XVII–XIX siècles), published in French in 2016. Inspired by a Foucauldian methodology, Doron provides a novel way to approach the historiography and philosophy of race and racism. Rather than focusing on traditional ways to conceptualize race, through alterity, and racism as emerging from polygenist theories that saw races as issuing from different origins and thwarting the idea of the unity of the human species, Doron argues that race is originally linked to theories of degeneration, and can be expressed through the concept of alteration. This allows him to envisage how discursive practices of race and racism and apparatuses of power that seek to govern race operate under theories of monogenism, which take the human species as a singular unity, and under the juridico-legal and metaphysical banner of "humanity" or "the universal."
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《变了的人》简介:十七世纪到十九世纪的种族与退化史
摘要:本文收录了尼古拉斯·安东尼·埃珀特对克劳德·奥利维尔·多伦2016年以法语出版的《L'homme altèrè:种族与发展》(XVII-XIX siècles)引言的英译本。受傅方法论的启发,多伦提供了一种新颖的方法来研究种族和种族主义的史学和哲学。多伦认为,种族最初与退化理论有关,可以通过改变的概念来表达,而不是专注于通过交替和种族主义来概念化种族的传统方式,因为种族主义是从多元理论中产生的,多元理论认为种族来自不同的起源,阻碍了人类物种统一的理念。这使他能够设想种族和种族主义的散漫实践以及试图治理种族的权力机构是如何在单基因主义理论下运作的,该理论将人类物种视为一个单一的整体,并在“人性”或“普遍性”的法律和形而上学旗帜下运作
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Philosophy of Race
Critical Philosophy of Race ETHNIC STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The critical philosophy of race consists in the philosophical examination of issues raised by the concept of race, the practices and mechanisms of racialization, and the persistence of various forms of racism across the world. Critical philosophy of race is a critical enterprise in three respects: it opposes racism in all its forms; it rejects the pseudosciences of old-fashioned biological racialism; and it denies that anti-racism and anti-racialism summarily eliminate race as a meaningful category of analysis. Critical philosophy of race is a philosophical enterprise because of its engagement with traditional philosophical questions and in its readiness to engage critically some of the traditional answers.
期刊最新文献
Being Black and Woman in a Racist and Sexist Society: Locating an Existential Standpoint Philosophy in Mamphela Ramphele’s Autobiography Race, Intellectual Racism, and the Opened Door Rodney, Mills, and Rousseau: Revisiting the Social Contract Idea “Why Race Still Matters” Can Iqaba Possess Ontological Legitimacy?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1