Estate landscapes in Gelderland

IF 0.1 0 ARCHITECTURE Bulletin KNOB Pub Date : 2021-12-19 DOI:10.48003/knob.120.2021.4.731
P. Thissen
{"title":"Estate landscapes in Gelderland","authors":"P. Thissen","doi":"10.48003/knob.120.2021.4.731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Province of Gelderland has long boasted a large number of country houses and landed estates, which over time coalesced into estate landscapes around the historical capitals of the Duchy of Guelders quarters of Nijmegen, Arnhem and Zutphen. \nRapidly increasing urbanization from the end of the nineteenth century onwards threatened the coherence and accessibility of these landscapes. Gelderland’s largest cities, Arnhem and Nijmegen, watched in dismay as many country houses and landed estates fell victim to subdivision and development. In response they started to buy up portions of that estate landscape to ensure that they would remain available to city dwellers. In addition, the ‘safety net’ provided by newly established nature and landscape organizations, in particular Natuurmonumenten and Geldersch Landschap & Kasteelen, also contributed to preservation and permanent accessibility by offering landed families the opportunity to keep their estate intact, albeit no longer under their ownership. \nSimilar motives – the need to preserve attractive, accessible walking areas for the increasingly urbanized society – underpinned the government’s introduction of the Nature Conservation Act in 1928. The Act was invoked more frequently in Gelderland than in any other province. It promoted the opening up of private properties as well as the preservation of the cultural value of the kind of ‘natural beauty’ to be found on landed estates. \nAfter the Second World War, in addition to resorting to the Nature Conservation Act, the owners of country houses and landed estates could avail themselves of an increasing variety of grants aimed at preserving (publicly accessible) nature, landscape and heritage, although the emphasis was firmly on nature. Estate landscapes like the Veluwezoom and the County of Zutphen were eventually safeguarded by a patchwork of different government regulations. \nIn the twenty-first century, government policy shifted towards providing financial support for both public and private contributions to nature, landscape and heritage by country houses and landed estates. This in turn has stimulated interest in estate landscapes. Instead of individual heritage-listed estates, the focus is now on areas with multiple country house and landed estates where there are spatial tasks waiting to be fulfilled: not just the preservation of natural beauty for outdoor recreation, but also spatial articulation, climate change adaptation, increased biodiversity and sustainable agriculture. Interest in design, both past and present, has burgeoned thanks to this development.","PeriodicalId":52053,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin KNOB","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin KNOB","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48003/knob.120.2021.4.731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Province of Gelderland has long boasted a large number of country houses and landed estates, which over time coalesced into estate landscapes around the historical capitals of the Duchy of Guelders quarters of Nijmegen, Arnhem and Zutphen. Rapidly increasing urbanization from the end of the nineteenth century onwards threatened the coherence and accessibility of these landscapes. Gelderland’s largest cities, Arnhem and Nijmegen, watched in dismay as many country houses and landed estates fell victim to subdivision and development. In response they started to buy up portions of that estate landscape to ensure that they would remain available to city dwellers. In addition, the ‘safety net’ provided by newly established nature and landscape organizations, in particular Natuurmonumenten and Geldersch Landschap & Kasteelen, also contributed to preservation and permanent accessibility by offering landed families the opportunity to keep their estate intact, albeit no longer under their ownership. Similar motives – the need to preserve attractive, accessible walking areas for the increasingly urbanized society – underpinned the government’s introduction of the Nature Conservation Act in 1928. The Act was invoked more frequently in Gelderland than in any other province. It promoted the opening up of private properties as well as the preservation of the cultural value of the kind of ‘natural beauty’ to be found on landed estates. After the Second World War, in addition to resorting to the Nature Conservation Act, the owners of country houses and landed estates could avail themselves of an increasing variety of grants aimed at preserving (publicly accessible) nature, landscape and heritage, although the emphasis was firmly on nature. Estate landscapes like the Veluwezoom and the County of Zutphen were eventually safeguarded by a patchwork of different government regulations. In the twenty-first century, government policy shifted towards providing financial support for both public and private contributions to nature, landscape and heritage by country houses and landed estates. This in turn has stimulated interest in estate landscapes. Instead of individual heritage-listed estates, the focus is now on areas with multiple country house and landed estates where there are spatial tasks waiting to be fulfilled: not just the preservation of natural beauty for outdoor recreation, but also spatial articulation, climate change adaptation, increased biodiversity and sustainable agriculture. Interest in design, both past and present, has burgeoned thanks to this development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gelderland的房地产景观
盖尔德兰省长期以来拥有大量的乡村住宅和地产,随着时间的推移,这些住宅和地产融合成了盖尔德斯公国历史首都奈梅亨、阿纳姆和祖特芬周围的地产景观。从19世纪末开始,快速增长的城市化威胁到这些景观的连贯性和可及性。盖尔德兰最大的城市阿纳姆和奈梅亨沮丧地看着许多乡村住宅和土地房地产成为细分和开发的受害者。作为回应,他们开始购买部分地产景观,以确保城市居民仍然可以使用。此外,新成立的自然和景观组织,特别是Natuurmonumenten和Geldersch Landschap&Kasteelen提供的“安全网”,也为保护和永久无障碍提供了帮助,为有地家庭提供了保持其遗产完整的机会,尽管不再归其所有。类似的动机——需要为日益城市化的社会保留有吸引力、无障碍的步行区——支撑了政府在1928年推出《自然保护法》。该法案在盖尔德兰的援引频率高于其他任何省份。它促进了私人财产的开放,并保护了土地上那种“自然美景”的文化价值。第二次世界大战后,除了诉诸《自然保护法》外,乡村住宅和土地庄园的所有者还可以利用越来越多的赠款,旨在保护(公众可访问的)自然、景观和遗产,尽管重点是自然。Veluwezoom和Zutphen县等庄园景观最终受到了不同政府法规的保护。在21世纪,政府政策转向为乡村住宅和土地房地产对自然、景观和遗产的公共和私人贡献提供财政支持。这反过来又激发了人们对房地产景观的兴趣。现在的重点不再是单个列入遗产名录的庄园,而是拥有多个乡村别墅和土地庄园的地区,这些地区有空间任务有待完成:不仅是为户外娱乐保留自然美景,还有空间衔接、适应气候变化、增加生物多样性和可持续农业。由于这一发展,人们对过去和现在的设计都产生了浓厚的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin KNOB
Bulletin KNOB ARCHITECTURE-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
BRUUT Kunststof dromen Beperkte kansen op een zorgeloze oude dag Utrecht bouwt 1945-1975 | Post 65 - Een turbulente tijd | Experimentele woningbouw in Nederland 1968-1980 Vormgeven aan ontmoeting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1