‘What makes you say so?’ Metacognition improves the sustained learning of inferential reading skills in English as a second language

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Trends in Neuroscience and Education Pub Date : 2023-09-16 DOI:10.1016/j.tine.2023.100213
Delfina María Martelletti , Mariana Luzuriaga , Melina Furman
{"title":"‘What makes you say so?’ Metacognition improves the sustained learning of inferential reading skills in English as a second language","authors":"Delfina María Martelletti ,&nbsp;Mariana Luzuriaga ,&nbsp;Melina Furman","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2023.100213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This quasi-experimental study investigates the impact of enhancing metacognition in learning inferential reading skills in English as a second language.</p></div><div><h3>Procedures</h3><p>Six Grade 4 classes were randomly assigned to two groups. The “Control group” received an instructional unit on inferential reading skills. The “Metacognition group” received the same unit, including metacognitive activities. Students were assessed in metacognitive and inferential reading skills before (pre-test), immediately after (post-test) and four weeks after the intervention (deferred test).</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Metacognitive strategy instruction enhanced student learning of inferential reading skills and its sustainability in time. The Metacognition group attained a significantly higher average score in deploying metacognitive skills both in the post and deferred tests, indicating that the intervention was effective, as intended, to this end. While both groups significantly improved their proficiency in inferential reading skills after working with the provided instructional unit, there was a significant difference in the Metacognition group, which outperformed the Control one, even more strongly in the deferred test.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Findings support the importance of deliberately promoting metacognition as it positively impacts learning outcomes and sustainability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 100213"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949323000169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This quasi-experimental study investigates the impact of enhancing metacognition in learning inferential reading skills in English as a second language.

Procedures

Six Grade 4 classes were randomly assigned to two groups. The “Control group” received an instructional unit on inferential reading skills. The “Metacognition group” received the same unit, including metacognitive activities. Students were assessed in metacognitive and inferential reading skills before (pre-test), immediately after (post-test) and four weeks after the intervention (deferred test).

Findings

Metacognitive strategy instruction enhanced student learning of inferential reading skills and its sustainability in time. The Metacognition group attained a significantly higher average score in deploying metacognitive skills both in the post and deferred tests, indicating that the intervention was effective, as intended, to this end. While both groups significantly improved their proficiency in inferential reading skills after working with the provided instructional unit, there was a significant difference in the Metacognition group, which outperformed the Control one, even more strongly in the deferred test.

Conclusions

Findings support the importance of deliberately promoting metacognition as it positively impacts learning outcomes and sustainability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“你为什么这么说?”“元认知提高了以英语为第二语言的推理阅读技能的持续学习
目的这项准实验研究探讨了增强元认知对英语作为第二语言学习推理阅读技能的影响。程序将六个四年级的班级随机分为两组。“对照组”接受了一个关于推理阅读技能的教学单元。“元认知组”接受相同的单元,包括元认知活动。在干预前(测试前)、测试后(测试后)和干预后四周(延迟测试),对学生的元认知和推理阅读技能进行了评估。元认知组在后测和延期测中,在元认知技能的运用方面获得了显著更高的平均分数,这表明干预措施在这方面是有效的。虽然两组在使用所提供的教学单元后,推理阅读技能的熟练程度都有了显著提高,但元认知组的差异显著,其表现优于对照组,在延期测试中更为明显。结论研究支持有意促进元认知的重要性,因为它对学习结果和可持续性有积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
65 days
期刊最新文献
Dimensional versus categorical approach: A comparative study of mathematical cognition Translating neuroscience research to practice through grassroots professional learning communities Combining cognitive and affective factors related to mathematical achievement in 4th graders: A psychological network analysis study Neurobiological stress markers in educational research: A systematic review of physiological insights in health science education Applying the science of learning to teacher professional development and back again: Lessons from 3 country contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1