Grazing summer cover crops mix impact on carbonnitrogen cycling, soil water, and wheat yields

Partson Mubvumba , Paul B. DeLaune , Frank M. Hons
{"title":"Grazing summer cover crops mix impact on carbonnitrogen cycling, soil water, and wheat yields","authors":"Partson Mubvumba ,&nbsp;Paul B. DeLaune ,&nbsp;Frank M. Hons","doi":"10.1016/j.soisec.2023.100107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Summer fallow practice is common in the US semiarid Southern Great Plains ecoregion. Its primary objective is to store water to enhance winter wheat production for grain and grazing. Prior research on replacing fallow with legume cover crops (CC) (green manure) reported a yield loss through soil moisture depletion for winter wheat. Recent research has shown the potential of grass CC to enhance soil physical properties compared to legume CC. Cost-benefit analyses of CC make it difficult to justify their adoption. Grazing, however, offers an opportunity to mitigate CC costs. The impact of a grazed CC mix on stored soil water, C<img>N cycling, intercropping, and wheat yields was evaluated. Although CC used soil moisture early in the growing season and nitrate+nitrite-N, they recharged soil moisture by the critical wheat seeding and dormancy-breaking periods. In the summer of 2014, net mineralization in CC increased nitrate+nitrite-N by 10-fold compared to 2013 concentrations, resulting in no significant differences in yields in 2015. Nitrate+nitrite-N was reduced by 28% in 2015 compared to the preceding year due to CC growth and net nitrate+nitrite-N immobilization in residues, resulting in 25% less yield in CC treatments in 2016 compared to no-till (NT) fallow. Grazed and ungrazed CC enhanced organic N by up to four times that in NT fallow and sequestered particulate organic N and C by 7–17% and 6–10%, respectively, in micro-aggregates. Despite reducing biomass by 56%, grazing did not differ from most ungrazed measured soil parameters, offering the potential for mitigating CC production costs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74839,"journal":{"name":"Soil security","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006223000242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summer fallow practice is common in the US semiarid Southern Great Plains ecoregion. Its primary objective is to store water to enhance winter wheat production for grain and grazing. Prior research on replacing fallow with legume cover crops (CC) (green manure) reported a yield loss through soil moisture depletion for winter wheat. Recent research has shown the potential of grass CC to enhance soil physical properties compared to legume CC. Cost-benefit analyses of CC make it difficult to justify their adoption. Grazing, however, offers an opportunity to mitigate CC costs. The impact of a grazed CC mix on stored soil water, CN cycling, intercropping, and wheat yields was evaluated. Although CC used soil moisture early in the growing season and nitrate+nitrite-N, they recharged soil moisture by the critical wheat seeding and dormancy-breaking periods. In the summer of 2014, net mineralization in CC increased nitrate+nitrite-N by 10-fold compared to 2013 concentrations, resulting in no significant differences in yields in 2015. Nitrate+nitrite-N was reduced by 28% in 2015 compared to the preceding year due to CC growth and net nitrate+nitrite-N immobilization in residues, resulting in 25% less yield in CC treatments in 2016 compared to no-till (NT) fallow. Grazed and ungrazed CC enhanced organic N by up to four times that in NT fallow and sequestered particulate organic N and C by 7–17% and 6–10%, respectively, in micro-aggregates. Despite reducing biomass by 56%, grazing did not differ from most ungrazed measured soil parameters, offering the potential for mitigating CC production costs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放牧夏季覆盖作物混合对碳氮循环、土壤水分和小麦产量的影响
夏季休耕在美国半干旱的南部大平原生态区很常见。其主要目标是蓄水,以提高冬小麦产量,用于粮食和放牧。先前关于用豆类覆盖作物(CC)(绿肥)取代休耕的研究报告称,冬小麦的产量因土壤水分耗尽而损失。最近的研究表明,与豆类CC相比,草CC具有提高土壤物理性质的潜力。CC的成本效益分析使其难以证明采用的合理性。然而,放牧提供了一个降低CC成本的机会。评估了放牧CC混合物对储存土壤水分、CN循环、间作和小麦产量的影响。尽管CC在生长季节早期使用土壤水分和硝酸盐+亚硝酸盐-N,但它们在关键的小麦播种期和休眠期补充了土壤水分。2014年夏天,CC的净矿化使硝酸盐+亚硝酸盐-N的浓度比2013年增加了10倍,导致2015年产量没有显著差异。与前一年相比,2015年硝酸盐+亚硝酸盐-N减少了28%,这是由于CC的生长和残留物中硝酸盐+硝酸盐-N的净固定化,导致2016年CC处理的产量比免耕(NT)休耕减少了25%。放牧和未放牧CC使有机氮增加了NT休耕的四倍,并在微团聚体中分别将颗粒有机氮和碳螯合了7-17%和6-10%。尽管生物量减少了56%,但放牧与大多数未分级的测量土壤参数没有差异,这为降低CC生产成本提供了潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Lithofacies and pore characterization of the Lower Permian Shanxi and Taiyuan shales in the southern North China Basin
IF 4.965 2区 工程技术Journal of Natural Gas Science and EngineeringPub Date : 2016-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.11.013
Shuai Tang , Jinchuan Zhang , Derek Elsworth , Xuan Tang , Zhongming Li , Xiaorui Du , Xiaoqun Yang
Ichnofossils and ichnofabrics in the Lower Permian Taiyuan Formation of North China Basin
IF 1.5 Geodinamica ActaPub Date : 2016-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/09853111.2015.1054082
Hui-bo Song, Hailin Wang, Fang Wang, Ruiqing Guo, Bin Hu
来源期刊
Soil security
Soil security Soil Science
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
90 days
期刊最新文献
Urbanization and sealing of fertile soils: A case study in Wisconsin 2001–2021 Can biochar amendment alter the sorption of glyphosate in the Australian Vertosol soil system? Connecting consumers and soil: Development of a conceptual model for shaping the consumer market for soil stewardship in Australia Pedological and taxonomical research of Indian tropical soils for fulfilling the UN SDGs: Current status and the future scope Morphological, physiological, and anatomical effects of heavy metals on soil and plant health and possible remediation technologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1