The association of medical providers’ attitudes about naloxone and treating people with opioid use disorder and their self-reported low-barrier treatment practices

Q1 Psychology Addictive Behaviors Reports Pub Date : 2023-08-26 DOI:10.1016/j.abrep.2023.100514
Rachel P. Winograd, Bridget Coffey, Melissa Nance, Ryan Carpenter
{"title":"The association of medical providers’ attitudes about naloxone and treating people with opioid use disorder and their self-reported low-barrier treatment practices","authors":"Rachel P. Winograd,&nbsp;Bridget Coffey,&nbsp;Melissa Nance,&nbsp;Ryan Carpenter","doi":"10.1016/j.abrep.2023.100514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Opioid-involved overdose deaths continue to climb, in part because of suboptimal access to and retention on medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), including buprenorphine. Low barrier buprenorphine treatment aims to reduce or eliminate the threshold for getting and staying on medication by providing immediate and long-term access to buprenorphine without strict rules or requirements. This study examines associations between medical providers’ beliefs about treating people with opioid use disorder (OUD) and naloxone access with their self-reported low-barrier buprenorphine prescribing practices. We surveyed and analyzed responses from providers (N = 86) who completed X-waiver courses in Missouri between March 2017 and September 2019, of which 55% (<em>n</em> = 47) both completed the full survey and endorsed prescribing buprenorphine since the training. The survey included questions about buprenorphine prescribing behaviors as well as the Naloxone-Related Risk Compensation Beliefs (NaRCC-B) scale and the Attitudes toward Patients with OUD scale. Analyses consisted of a series of linear and logistic regressions with the NaRCC-B and OUD Attitudes scales predicting various domains of low-barrier prescribing behaviors. Findings indicate medical providers’ beliefs about treating people with OUD are associated with their practice of addiction medicine, with individuals with more favorable views being more likely to endorse low-barrier buprenorphine prescribing practices including offering telemedicine and at-home inductions, prescribing higher doses of buprenorphine, treating larger caseloads, and discussing overdose risk and protective factors with their patients. Providers’ beliefs about naloxone being enabling were less related to their buprenorphine practices but strongly related to their likelihood of providing naloxone. Future research may examine which strategies effectively change prescriber attitudes and their adoption of lower-barrier prescribing practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38040,"journal":{"name":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853223000366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Opioid-involved overdose deaths continue to climb, in part because of suboptimal access to and retention on medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), including buprenorphine. Low barrier buprenorphine treatment aims to reduce or eliminate the threshold for getting and staying on medication by providing immediate and long-term access to buprenorphine without strict rules or requirements. This study examines associations between medical providers’ beliefs about treating people with opioid use disorder (OUD) and naloxone access with their self-reported low-barrier buprenorphine prescribing practices. We surveyed and analyzed responses from providers (N = 86) who completed X-waiver courses in Missouri between March 2017 and September 2019, of which 55% (n = 47) both completed the full survey and endorsed prescribing buprenorphine since the training. The survey included questions about buprenorphine prescribing behaviors as well as the Naloxone-Related Risk Compensation Beliefs (NaRCC-B) scale and the Attitudes toward Patients with OUD scale. Analyses consisted of a series of linear and logistic regressions with the NaRCC-B and OUD Attitudes scales predicting various domains of low-barrier prescribing behaviors. Findings indicate medical providers’ beliefs about treating people with OUD are associated with their practice of addiction medicine, with individuals with more favorable views being more likely to endorse low-barrier buprenorphine prescribing practices including offering telemedicine and at-home inductions, prescribing higher doses of buprenorphine, treating larger caseloads, and discussing overdose risk and protective factors with their patients. Providers’ beliefs about naloxone being enabling were less related to their buprenorphine practices but strongly related to their likelihood of providing naloxone. Future research may examine which strategies effectively change prescriber attitudes and their adoption of lower-barrier prescribing practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗提供者对纳洛酮的态度与治疗阿片类药物使用障碍患者的关系及其自我报告的低障碍治疗实践
阿片类药物过量死亡人数继续攀升,部分原因是阿片类使用障碍(MOOD)药物(包括丁丙诺啡)的获取和保留不理想。低屏障丁丙诺啡治疗旨在通过在没有严格规则或要求的情况下提供即时和长期的丁丙诺菲治疗,降低或消除获得和继续服药的门槛。这项研究考察了医疗提供者对治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者的信念和纳洛酮的使用与他们自我报告的低屏障丁丙诺啡处方实践之间的关系。我们调查并分析了2017年3月至2019年9月期间在密苏里州完成X豁免课程的提供者(N=86)的回复,其中55%(N=47)完成了完整的调查,并在培训后批准开具丁丙诺啡处方。该调查包括关于丁丙诺啡处方行为、纳洛酮相关风险补偿信念(NaRCC-B)量表和对OUD患者的态度量表的问题。分析包括一系列线性和逻辑回归,使用NaRCC-B和OUD态度量表预测低障碍处方行为的各个领域。研究结果表明,医疗提供者对治疗OUD患者的信念与他们的成瘾医学实践有关,持更有利观点的人更有可能支持低屏障丁丙诺啡处方实践,包括提供远程医疗和家庭诱导、开更高剂量的丁丙诺菲处方、治疗更大的病例量,并与患者讨论服药过量的风险和保护因素。提供者对纳洛酮有效性的信念与他们的丁丙诺啡实践无关,但与他们提供纳洛酮的可能性密切相关。未来的研究可能会检验哪些策略可以有效地改变处方医生的态度,以及他们采用较低障碍的处方实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Addictive Behaviors Reports
Addictive Behaviors Reports Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Addictive Behaviors Reports is an open-access and peer reviewed online-only journal offering an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research in addictive behaviors. The journal accepts submissions that are scientifically sound on all forms of addictive behavior (alcohol, drugs, gambling, Internet, nicotine and technology) with a primary focus on behavioral and psychosocial research. The emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. We are particularly interested in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research. Studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry as well as scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are also very much encouraged. We also welcome multimedia submissions that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings.
期刊最新文献
Reliability generalization Meta-Analysis and psychometric review of the Gaming Disorder test (GDT): Evaluating internal consistency Proteus effect avatar profiles: Associations with disordered gaming and activity levels Acceptability of heart rate-based remote monitoring of smoking status Video slot machine use in adolescence: the role of self-efficacy beliefs, current and expected personal fulfillment at the social and educational level Cognitive inflexibility moderates the relationship between relief-driven drinking motives and alcohol use
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1