Validation of UV-Index retrieved from three satellites against Ground-Based measurements at different climates in Egypt

IF 3.7 3区 地球科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejrs.2023.04.006
Marwa S. Mohamed , M.M. Abdel Wahab , Mossad El‐Metwally , Eman F. El-Nobi
{"title":"Validation of UV-Index retrieved from three satellites against Ground-Based measurements at different climates in Egypt","authors":"Marwa S. Mohamed ,&nbsp;M.M. Abdel Wahab ,&nbsp;Mossad El‐Metwally ,&nbsp;Eman F. El-Nobi","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrs.2023.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The UV Index is a useful tool to alert people with possible risks of exposure to solar UV radiation in Egypt. Ground UV-Index observation is a primary source to monitor solar UV levels, however the spatial coverage of the ground station is quite limited. The validation of available measurements were used frequently to define the possibility of using satellite data when measurements are not available, this was carried out for (leave area index and temperatures) for example (<span>Ganguly et al., 2012</span>) and (<span>Laraby and Schott, 2018</span>). In order to test the validity of the UV-index satellite products against ground observations, three satellite instruments (OMI, Terra + Aqua, and Terra + Npp) was performed at noontime in all sky conditions in the period 2012–2017 at three sites; Aswan, Cairo, and Matruh. The aforementioned sites were selected to represent different climates in Egypt. Annual intercomparison highlighted higher relative bias (rbias) at OMI (6.4 %) than both Terra + Aqua (2.3%) and Terra + Npp (2.8%). Also, Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), shows that OMI (10.6%) is relatively higher than both Terra + Aqua and Terra + Npp. (8.5 %). Based on these results, both Terra + Aqua and Terra + Npp have a better performance with respect to ground observations than OMI. This was due to OMI being more sensitive to dust and cloud than, Terra + Aqua and Terra + Npp.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48539,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences","volume":"26 2","pages":"Pages 361-367"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S111098232300025X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The UV Index is a useful tool to alert people with possible risks of exposure to solar UV radiation in Egypt. Ground UV-Index observation is a primary source to monitor solar UV levels, however the spatial coverage of the ground station is quite limited. The validation of available measurements were used frequently to define the possibility of using satellite data when measurements are not available, this was carried out for (leave area index and temperatures) for example (Ganguly et al., 2012) and (Laraby and Schott, 2018). In order to test the validity of the UV-index satellite products against ground observations, three satellite instruments (OMI, Terra + Aqua, and Terra + Npp) was performed at noontime in all sky conditions in the period 2012–2017 at three sites; Aswan, Cairo, and Matruh. The aforementioned sites were selected to represent different climates in Egypt. Annual intercomparison highlighted higher relative bias (rbias) at OMI (6.4 %) than both Terra + Aqua (2.3%) and Terra + Npp (2.8%). Also, Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), shows that OMI (10.6%) is relatively higher than both Terra + Aqua and Terra + Npp. (8.5 %). Based on these results, both Terra + Aqua and Terra + Npp have a better performance with respect to ground observations than OMI. This was due to OMI being more sensitive to dust and cloud than, Terra + Aqua and Terra + Npp.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据埃及不同气候条件下的地面测量,验证从三颗卫星获取的紫外线指数
紫外线指数是一个有用的工具,可以提醒人们在埃及可能有暴露于太阳紫外线辐射的风险。地面紫外线指数观测是监测太阳紫外线水平的主要来源,但地面站的空间覆盖范围非常有限。当测量不可用时,经常使用可用测量的验证来定义使用卫星数据的可能性,例如(Ganguly等人,2012)和(Laraby和Schott,2018)。为了测试紫外线指数卫星产品与地面观测的有效性,2012-2017年期间,在三个地点的所有天空条件下,于中午对三台卫星仪器(OMI、Terra+Aqua和Terra+Npp)进行了测试;阿斯旺、开罗和马特鲁。选择上述地点是为了代表埃及的不同气候。年度相互比较显示,OMI(6.4%)的相对偏差(rbias)高于Terra+Aqua(2.3%)和Terra+Npp(2.8%)。此外,平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)显示,OMI(10.6%)相对高于Terra+Aqua和Terra+Npp。(8.5%)。基于这些结果,Terra+Aqua和Terra+Npp在地面观测方面都比OMI具有更好的性能。这是因为OMI比Terra+Aqua和Terra+Npp对灰尘和云更敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
48 weeks
期刊介绍: The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences (EJRS) encompasses a comprehensive range of topics within Remote Sensing, Geographic Information Systems (GIS), planetary geology, and space technology development, including theories, applications, and modeling. EJRS aims to disseminate high-quality, peer-reviewed research focusing on the advancement of remote sensing and GIS technologies and their practical applications for effective planning, sustainable development, and environmental resource conservation. The journal particularly welcomes innovative papers with broad scientific appeal.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Spectral–Spatial Adaptive Weighted Fusion and Residual Dense Network for hyperspectral image classification New radio-seismic indicator for ELF seismic precursors detectability Estimation of above ground biomass of mangrove forest plot using terrestrial laser scanner Efficient bundle optimization for accurate camera pose estimation in mobile augmented reality systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1