Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence of healthcare-associated Clostridioides difficile infection in a tertiary healthcare facility in the Republic of Ireland

IF 1.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infection Prevention in Practice Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.infpip.2023.100300
Saied Ali, Sinead McDermott
{"title":"Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence of healthcare-associated Clostridioides difficile infection in a tertiary healthcare facility in the Republic of Ireland","authors":"Saied Ali,&nbsp;Sinead McDermott","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2023.100300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><em>Clostridioides difficile</em> is the foremost cause of nosocomial infectious diarrhoea and one of the most prevalent healthcare associated infections (HAIs).</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To investigate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the incidence of healthcare associated <em>C. difficile</em> infection (HA-CDI).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective study was conducted from January 2019–December 2022 inclusive at a tertiary University Hospital in Dublin, Ireland. The study period was divided into COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 periods determined in tangent with the then national incidences of COVID-19 and number of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Analyses looked at quantity of testing performed, incidence rates and antimicrobial consumption. An independent samples t-test was used to determine significance between groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 periods, no statistically significant difference was observed among HA-CDI rates per 10,000 bed-days (2.1 cases vs 1.76 cases; <em>P</em>=0.34), consumption of defined daily doses per 100 bed-days of antimicrobials – all antimicrobials (83.36 vs 89.5; <em>P</em>=0.091), fluoroquinolones only (3.71 vs 4.46; <em>P</em>=0.067), third-generation cephalosporins only (4.17 vs 4.43; <em>P</em>=0.449), carbapenems only (3.28 vs 3.26; <em>P</em>=0.944) – or the number of <em>C. difficile</em> tests performed per 10,000 bed-days (321.81 tests vs 326.63 tests; <em>P</em>=0.696).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There was no difference in the incidence rates of HA-CDI between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 periods at our institution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Prevention in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088923000331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Clostridioides difficile is the foremost cause of nosocomial infectious diarrhoea and one of the most prevalent healthcare associated infections (HAIs).

Aims

To investigate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the incidence of healthcare associated C. difficile infection (HA-CDI).

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted from January 2019–December 2022 inclusive at a tertiary University Hospital in Dublin, Ireland. The study period was divided into COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 periods determined in tangent with the then national incidences of COVID-19 and number of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Analyses looked at quantity of testing performed, incidence rates and antimicrobial consumption. An independent samples t-test was used to determine significance between groups.

Results

Between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 periods, no statistically significant difference was observed among HA-CDI rates per 10,000 bed-days (2.1 cases vs 1.76 cases; P=0.34), consumption of defined daily doses per 100 bed-days of antimicrobials – all antimicrobials (83.36 vs 89.5; P=0.091), fluoroquinolones only (3.71 vs 4.46; P=0.067), third-generation cephalosporins only (4.17 vs 4.43; P=0.449), carbapenems only (3.28 vs 3.26; P=0.944) – or the number of C. difficile tests performed per 10,000 bed-days (321.81 tests vs 326.63 tests; P=0.696).

Conclusions

There was no difference in the incidence rates of HA-CDI between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 periods at our institution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019冠状病毒病大流行对爱尔兰共和国三级卫生保健机构中与卫生保健相关的艰难梭菌感染发生率的影响
背景艰难梭菌是医院感染性腹泻的主要原因,也是最常见的卫生保健相关感染之一。目的探讨2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对卫生保健相关性艰难梭菌感染(HA-CDI)发生率的影响。方法回顾性研究于2019年1月至2022年12月在爱尔兰都柏林的一家三级大学医院进行。根据当时全国COVID-19发病率和住院患者人数,将研究期分为COVID-19期和非COVID-19期。分析着眼于所进行的检测数量、发病率和抗微生物药物消耗量。采用独立样本t检验确定组间显著性。结果在COVID-19与非COVID-19期间,HA-CDI发生率(每万床日2.1例vs 1.76例;P=0.34),每100个住院日使用规定每日剂量的抗菌素-所有抗菌素(83.36 vs 89.5;P=0.091),仅使用氟喹诺酮类药物(3.71 vs 4.46;P=0.067),仅使用第三代头孢菌素(4.17 vs 4.43;P=0.449),仅碳青霉烯类(3.28 vs 3.26;P=0.944)——或每10,000个床位日进行艰难梭菌测试的次数(321.81次测试对326.63次测试;P = 0.696)。结论我院新冠肺炎期间HA-CDI与非新冠肺炎期间HA-CDI发生率无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infection Prevention in Practice
Infection Prevention in Practice Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
61 days
期刊最新文献
Low prevalence of borderline oxacillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (BORSA) in a tertiary care hospital in South Carolina Assessing the state of infection prevention and control in cameroon: a cross-sectional workshop evaluation using socioecological models ‘The Law of Unintended Consequences’ – Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection complicating peripheral intravascular cannulation in an epilepsy monitoring unit Susceptibility patterns of Candida species collected from intensive care units in Portugal: a prospective study in 2020–2022 Successful control of an outbreak of Panton–Valentine leucocidin positive meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a National Burns Unit through early detection by whole genome sequencing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1