Computer vision with smartphone microphotography for detection of carious lesions

Taseef Hasan Farook , Saif Ahmed , Nafij Bin Jamayet , James Dudley
{"title":"Computer vision with smartphone microphotography for detection of carious lesions","authors":"Taseef Hasan Farook ,&nbsp;Saif Ahmed ,&nbsp;Nafij Bin Jamayet ,&nbsp;James Dudley","doi":"10.1016/j.ibmed.2023.100105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate the similarities in microphotographic images across different smartphones and to establish whether computer vision can use microphotographs to successfully classify dental caries.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A universal clip-type microscope with 60x optical zoom was selected to perform in vitro microphotography of extracted teeth. For the first objective, areas of cariogenic interest were physically labelled by dentists and eight smartphones were used to capture images of tooth decays with the microscope fitted over the primary camera lens. For the second objective, 233 microphotography images were acquired and virtually augmented to produce 1631 images that were categorized digitally by an international caries classification system for computer vision-based object detection (YOLO.v4). Five practitioners independently labelled randomly selected images from the test dataset following the caries classification system which were subsequently used to evaluate the diagnostic test accuracy of the YOLO model.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>A significant overall mean square error [F (df) = 4.03 (6); P &lt; 0.05] was observed while Bhattacharya's distance evaluation produced no significant differences [F (df) = 1.60 (6); P &gt; 0.05] across all eight smartphone derived datasets. Index and reference test comparisons determined an overall sensitivity of 0.99 and specificity of 0.94 for the trained YOLO.v4 and highly significant correlations (r &gt; 0.9, P &lt; 0.001) to the classifications labelled by the dental practitioners.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Non-standardized images of tooth caries captured by different smartphones generated an accurate diagnostic model for classifying carious lesions that was similar to the visual assessments performed by experienced dental practitioners.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73399,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence-based medicine","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence-based medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666521223000194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the similarities in microphotographic images across different smartphones and to establish whether computer vision can use microphotographs to successfully classify dental caries.

Method

A universal clip-type microscope with 60x optical zoom was selected to perform in vitro microphotography of extracted teeth. For the first objective, areas of cariogenic interest were physically labelled by dentists and eight smartphones were used to capture images of tooth decays with the microscope fitted over the primary camera lens. For the second objective, 233 microphotography images were acquired and virtually augmented to produce 1631 images that were categorized digitally by an international caries classification system for computer vision-based object detection (YOLO.v4). Five practitioners independently labelled randomly selected images from the test dataset following the caries classification system which were subsequently used to evaluate the diagnostic test accuracy of the YOLO model.

Result

A significant overall mean square error [F (df) = 4.03 (6); P < 0.05] was observed while Bhattacharya's distance evaluation produced no significant differences [F (df) = 1.60 (6); P > 0.05] across all eight smartphone derived datasets. Index and reference test comparisons determined an overall sensitivity of 0.99 and specificity of 0.94 for the trained YOLO.v4 and highly significant correlations (r > 0.9, P < 0.001) to the classifications labelled by the dental practitioners.

Conclusion

Non-standardized images of tooth caries captured by different smartphones generated an accurate diagnostic model for classifying carious lesions that was similar to the visual assessments performed by experienced dental practitioners.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算机视觉与智能手机显微摄影检测龋齿病变
目的评估不同智能手机的显微照片图像的相似性,并确定计算机视觉是否可以使用显微照片成功地对龋齿进行分类。方法选用60倍光学变焦的通用夹式显微镜对拔除的牙齿进行体外显微摄影。第一个目标是,牙医对感兴趣的致龋区域进行物理标记,并使用八部智能手机在主摄像头上安装显微镜,捕捉牙齿腐烂的图像。对于第二个目的,采集了233张显微摄影图像,并对其进行了虚拟增强,生成了1631张图像,这些图像由国际龋齿分类系统进行了数字分类,用于基于计算机视觉的物体检测(YOLO.v4)。五名从业者根据龋齿分类系统从测试数据集中独立标记随机选择的图像,随后用于评估YOLO模型的诊断测试准确性。结果在所有八个智能手机衍生数据集中,观察到显著的总体均方误差[F(df)=4.03(6);P<;0.05],而Bhattacharya的距离评估没有产生显著差异[F(df)=1.60(6),P>;0.05]。指数和参考测试的比较确定了经过训练的YOLO.v4的总体灵敏度为0.99,特异性为0.94,并且与牙科医生标记的分类具有高度显著的相关性(r>0.9,P<0.001)。结论不同智能手机拍摄的非标准化龋齿图像为龋齿病变的分类提供了准确的诊断模型,与经验丰富的牙科医生进行的视觉评估相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intelligence-based medicine
Intelligence-based medicine Health Informatics
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
187 days
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence in child development monitoring: A systematic review on usage, outcomes and acceptance Automatic characterization of cerebral MRI images for the detection of autism spectrum disorders DOTnet 2.0: Deep learning network for diffuse optical tomography image reconstruction Artificial intelligence in child development monitoring: A systematic review on usage, outcomes and acceptance Clustering polycystic ovary syndrome laboratory results extracted from a large internet forum with machine learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1