Classification and antioxidant assays of polyphenols: a review

IF 5.2 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of Future Foods Pub Date : 2023-09-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jfutfo.2023.07.002
Yuxi Lang , Ningxuan Gao , Zhihuan Zang , Xianjun Meng , Yang Lin , Shufang Yang , Yiyun Yang , Zhufeng Jin , Bin Li
{"title":"Classification and antioxidant assays of polyphenols: a review","authors":"Yuxi Lang ,&nbsp;Ningxuan Gao ,&nbsp;Zhihuan Zang ,&nbsp;Xianjun Meng ,&nbsp;Yang Lin ,&nbsp;Shufang Yang ,&nbsp;Yiyun Yang ,&nbsp;Zhufeng Jin ,&nbsp;Bin Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jfutfo.2023.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Polyphenols are widely recognized as the effective antioxidants, which are divided into flavonoids, phenolic acids, stilbenes, lignans, tannins and so on. They could regulate internal functions and protect the body from diseases related to oxidative damage. Due to the fact that their antioxidant capacity is influenced by the structure, stability and bioavailability, the detection of their bioactivity should be considered comprehensively. Currently, the methods for measuring the antioxidant capacity of phenolic compounds are divided into chemical, cell-based and <em>in vivo</em> assays. The chemical assays include 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2′-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), ferric reducing /antioxidant power (FRAP), oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC), peroxyl radical scavenging capacity (PSC), which are rapid identification method, but their reaction mechanism has a great gap with the internal body response. The cell-based assays are more consistent with biological reaction, but still do not take the bioavailability into consideration. The <em>in vivo</em> assays, which commonly utilized <em>Caenorhabditis elegans</em> or rats as models, are more representative, but these methods are more complex and spend longer. This review summarizes the antioxidant evaluation methods of phenolic compounds and discusses their advantages and limitations comparatively, which could help discriminate and select the appropriate assay in the actual operation, and facilitate the development of comprehensive approaches as well.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100784,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Future Foods","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 193-204"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Future Foods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772566923000605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Polyphenols are widely recognized as the effective antioxidants, which are divided into flavonoids, phenolic acids, stilbenes, lignans, tannins and so on. They could regulate internal functions and protect the body from diseases related to oxidative damage. Due to the fact that their antioxidant capacity is influenced by the structure, stability and bioavailability, the detection of their bioactivity should be considered comprehensively. Currently, the methods for measuring the antioxidant capacity of phenolic compounds are divided into chemical, cell-based and in vivo assays. The chemical assays include 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2′-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), ferric reducing /antioxidant power (FRAP), oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC), peroxyl radical scavenging capacity (PSC), which are rapid identification method, but their reaction mechanism has a great gap with the internal body response. The cell-based assays are more consistent with biological reaction, but still do not take the bioavailability into consideration. The in vivo assays, which commonly utilized Caenorhabditis elegans or rats as models, are more representative, but these methods are more complex and spend longer. This review summarizes the antioxidant evaluation methods of phenolic compounds and discusses their advantages and limitations comparatively, which could help discriminate and select the appropriate assay in the actual operation, and facilitate the development of comprehensive approaches as well.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多酚类化合物的分类及抗氧化研究进展
多酚类物质是公认的有效抗氧化剂,分为黄酮类、酚酸类、二苯乙烯类、木脂素类、单宁类等。它们可以调节内部功能,保护身体免受与氧化损伤有关的疾病。由于其抗氧化能力受其结构、稳定性和生物利用度的影响,因此对其生物活性的检测应综合考虑。目前,测定酚类化合物抗氧化能力的方法分为化学法、细胞法和体内法。化学检测方法包括2,2-二苯基-1-吡啶肼(DPPH)、2,2 ' -氮唑-(3-乙基苯并噻唑-6-磺酸)(ABTS)、铁还原/抗氧化能力(FRAP)、氧自由基吸收能力(ORAC)、过氧自由基清除能力(PSC)等,均为快速鉴定方法,但其反应机理与体内反应存在较大差距。基于细胞的测定更符合生物反应,但仍未考虑生物利用度。通常以秀丽隐杆线虫或大鼠为模型的体内实验更具代表性,但这些方法较为复杂,耗时较长。本文对酚类化合物抗氧化评价方法进行了综述,并对其优缺点进行了比较讨论,有助于在实际操作中区分和选择合适的检测方法,也有利于综合评价方法的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of polishing, germination and particle size distribution on the nutrients and physicochemical properties of foxtail millet flour Exploring the Brazilian consumer perceptions of nanotechnology in food Exploring the active components and mechanism of Ziziphi Spinosae Semen in treating insomnia by network pharmacology and metabonomics Polyhydroxybutyrate production from Paeonia ostii pods by alkaline pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis followed by microbial fermentation Application of the Streptococcus pyogenes CRISPR/Cas9 system in Lacticaseibacillus paracasei CGMCC4691
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1