Armenia-India partnership: geopolitical and geo-economic implications in the Eurasian context

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Asia Europe Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-31 DOI:10.1007/s10308-023-00665-x
Radhika Lakshminarayanan, Tigran Yepremyan
{"title":"Armenia-India partnership: geopolitical and geo-economic implications in the Eurasian context","authors":"Radhika Lakshminarayanan,&nbsp;Tigran Yepremyan","doi":"10.1007/s10308-023-00665-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h2>Abstract\n</h2><div><p>In the twenty-first century, changing global power equations are impacting the dynamics of foreign and security policy choices of small states, as they seek to develop alliances and partnerships to offset their geopolitical and geo-economic vulnerabilities. In this context, Armenia’s security orientation is largely seen as consistently intertwined with Russia even after independence. Armenia has also attempted to develop a “normative alliance” with the European Union, relying mostly on its special relations with France. In recent years, various factors including domestic politics, deficit of security, and Russian dominance have led to a gradual re-orientation in the Armenian alliance trajectory towards more multilateral partnerships indicating a tendency towards “hedging” alliances. Conceptualizing from a theoretical foundation relating to small-state alliance options, this paper presents a case for Armenia-India strategic partnerships, given the historical and cultural ties between the two nations and the rapid growth of India as an emergent giant in the multipolar world. In this context of strategic analysis, the Georgia-Armenia-Iran corridor has a potential of vital geo-economic and geopolitical axis for India as well as for Russia, the EU, and China. The position of Armenia with its “both… and” integration approach, approximation with the EU, and strategic partnership with Russia has proved to be insufficient in security issues; however, the friendly disposition of a rising power, such as India, leaves Armenia with the capacity to diversify its security as a local civilizational and geo-economic connector.</p></div></div>","PeriodicalId":45680,"journal":{"name":"Asia Europe Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"81 - 100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Europe Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10308-023-00665-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract

In the twenty-first century, changing global power equations are impacting the dynamics of foreign and security policy choices of small states, as they seek to develop alliances and partnerships to offset their geopolitical and geo-economic vulnerabilities. In this context, Armenia’s security orientation is largely seen as consistently intertwined with Russia even after independence. Armenia has also attempted to develop a “normative alliance” with the European Union, relying mostly on its special relations with France. In recent years, various factors including domestic politics, deficit of security, and Russian dominance have led to a gradual re-orientation in the Armenian alliance trajectory towards more multilateral partnerships indicating a tendency towards “hedging” alliances. Conceptualizing from a theoretical foundation relating to small-state alliance options, this paper presents a case for Armenia-India strategic partnerships, given the historical and cultural ties between the two nations and the rapid growth of India as an emergent giant in the multipolar world. In this context of strategic analysis, the Georgia-Armenia-Iran corridor has a potential of vital geo-economic and geopolitical axis for India as well as for Russia, the EU, and China. The position of Armenia with its “both… and” integration approach, approximation with the EU, and strategic partnership with Russia has proved to be insufficient in security issues; however, the friendly disposition of a rising power, such as India, leaves Armenia with the capacity to diversify its security as a local civilizational and geo-economic connector.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚美尼亚-印度伙伴关系:欧亚背景下的地缘政治和地缘经济影响
摘要在21世纪,不断变化的全球权力方程式正在影响小国外交和安全政策选择的动态,因为它们寻求发展联盟和伙伴关系,以抵消其地缘政治和地缘经济脆弱性。在这种背景下,亚美尼亚的安全取向在很大程度上被视为即使在独立后也始终与俄罗斯交织在一起。亚美尼亚还试图与欧盟建立“规范联盟”,主要依靠其与法国的特殊关系。近年来,包括国内政治、安全赤字和俄罗斯主导地位在内的各种因素导致亚美尼亚联盟轨迹逐渐转向更多的多边伙伴关系,这表明有“对冲”联盟的趋势。鉴于亚美尼亚和印度之间的历史和文化联系,以及印度作为多极世界中新兴大国的快速发展,本文从与小国家联盟选项相关的理论基础上提出了亚美尼亚和印度战略伙伴关系的案例。在战略分析的背景下,格鲁吉亚-亚美尼亚-伊朗走廊对印度、俄罗斯、欧盟和中国来说都具有重要的地缘经济和地缘政治轴心的潜力。事实证明,亚美尼亚在安全问题上的立场是不够的,其“既……又”的一体化方法、与欧盟的接近以及与俄罗斯的战略伙伴关系;然而,印度等崛起大国的友好态度使亚美尼亚有能力将其安全多样化,成为当地文明和地缘经济的纽带。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Europe Journal
Asia Europe Journal INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Asia-Europe Journal is a quarterly journal dedicated to publishing quality academic papers and policy discussions on common challenges facing Asia and Europe that help to shape narratives on the common futures - including both risks and opportunities - of Asia and Europe. The Journal welcomes academically and intellectually rigorous research papers as well as topical policy briefs and thought pieces on issues of bi-regional interest, including management and political economy, innovation, security studies, regional and global governance, as well as on relevant socio-cultural developments and historical events. Officially cited as: Asia Eur J
期刊最新文献
Geo-economic and geopolitical developments in EU-asia security relations Informing macrologistics connectivity in emerging economies through a triangulated research approach: the case of Uzbekistan Correction: The regime complex for digital trade in Asia and China’s engagement Paradiplomacy and international conflict: disengagement from China by Swedish local governments International law: from fragmentation to integration? an analysis of the relationship between international trade law and international labor law in multilateral and regional trade law frameworks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1