Long-term kinesthetic motor imagery practice with a BCI: Impacts on user experience, motor cortex oscillations and BCI performances

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in Human Behavior Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107789
Sébastien Rimbert , Stéphanie Fleck
{"title":"Long-term kinesthetic motor imagery practice with a BCI: Impacts on user experience, motor cortex oscillations and BCI performances","authors":"Sébastien Rimbert ,&nbsp;Stéphanie Fleck","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2023.107789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Kinesthetic motor imagery (KMI) generates specific brain patterns in sensorimotor rhythm over the motor cortex (called event-related (de)-synchronization, ERD/ERS), allowing KMI to be detected by a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) through electroencephalographic (EEG) signal. Because performing a KMI task stimulates synaptic plasticity, KMI-based BCIs hold promise for many applications requiring long-term KMI practice (e.g., sports training or post-stroke rehabilitation). However, there is a lack of studies on the long-term KMI-based BCI interactions, especially regarding the relationship between intrapersonal factors and motor pattern variations. This pilot study aims to understand better (i) how brain motor patterns change over time for a given individual, (ii) whether intrapersonal factors might influence BCI practice, and (iii) how the brain motor patterns underlying the KMI task (i.e., ERDs and ERSs) are modulated over time by the BCI user’s experience. To this end, we recruited an expert in this mental task who performed over 2080 KMIs in 26 different sessions over a period of five months. The originality of this study lies in the detailed examination of cross-referenced data from EEG signals, BCI data performance, and 13 different surveys. The results show that this repetitive and prolonged practice did not diminish his well-being and, in particular, generated a sense of automatization of the task. We observed a progressive attenuation of the ERD amplitude and a concentration in the motor areas as the sessions accumulated. All these elements point to a phenomenon of neural efficiency. If confirmed by other studies, this phenomenon could call into question the quality of the BCI in providing continuous stimulation to the user. In addition, the results of this pilot study provide insights into what might influence the response of the motor cortex (e.g. emotions, task control, diet, etc.) and promising opportunities for improving the instructional design of BCIs intended for long-term use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 107789"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563223001401","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Kinesthetic motor imagery (KMI) generates specific brain patterns in sensorimotor rhythm over the motor cortex (called event-related (de)-synchronization, ERD/ERS), allowing KMI to be detected by a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) through electroencephalographic (EEG) signal. Because performing a KMI task stimulates synaptic plasticity, KMI-based BCIs hold promise for many applications requiring long-term KMI practice (e.g., sports training or post-stroke rehabilitation). However, there is a lack of studies on the long-term KMI-based BCI interactions, especially regarding the relationship between intrapersonal factors and motor pattern variations. This pilot study aims to understand better (i) how brain motor patterns change over time for a given individual, (ii) whether intrapersonal factors might influence BCI practice, and (iii) how the brain motor patterns underlying the KMI task (i.e., ERDs and ERSs) are modulated over time by the BCI user’s experience. To this end, we recruited an expert in this mental task who performed over 2080 KMIs in 26 different sessions over a period of five months. The originality of this study lies in the detailed examination of cross-referenced data from EEG signals, BCI data performance, and 13 different surveys. The results show that this repetitive and prolonged practice did not diminish his well-being and, in particular, generated a sense of automatization of the task. We observed a progressive attenuation of the ERD amplitude and a concentration in the motor areas as the sessions accumulated. All these elements point to a phenomenon of neural efficiency. If confirmed by other studies, this phenomenon could call into question the quality of the BCI in providing continuous stimulation to the user. In addition, the results of this pilot study provide insights into what might influence the response of the motor cortex (e.g. emotions, task control, diet, etc.) and promising opportunities for improving the instructional design of BCIs intended for long-term use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑机接口的长期动觉运动图像练习:对用户体验、运动皮层振荡和脑机接口性能的影响
运动感觉运动成像(KMI)在运动皮层产生特定的感觉运动节律大脑模式(称为事件相关(去)同步,ERD/ERS),使脑机接口(BCI)能够通过脑电图(EEG)信号检测到KMI。由于执行KMI任务刺激突触可塑性,基于KMI的脑机接口有望用于许多需要长期KMI实践的应用(例如,运动训练或脑卒中后康复)。然而,缺乏对长期基于KMI的脑机接口相互作用的研究,特别是关于个人因素与运动模式变化之间的关系的研究。这项试点研究旨在更好地了解(i)特定个体的大脑运动模式如何随时间变化,(ii)个人内部因素是否会影响脑机接口实践,以及(iii)脑机接口用户的体验如何随时间调节KMI任务背后的大脑运动模式(即ERD和ERS)。为此,我们招募了一位从事这项心理任务的专家,他在五个月的时间里,在26个不同的疗程中进行了2080多次KMI。这项研究的独创性在于详细检查了EEG信号的交叉参考数据、脑机接口数据性能和13项不同的调查。结果表明,这种重复和长时间的练习并没有降低他的幸福感,尤其是产生了任务的自动化感。我们观察到ERD振幅的逐渐衰减和运动区域的集中,随着会话的积累。所有这些因素都指向一种神经效率现象。如果得到其他研究的证实,这种现象可能会对脑机接口为用户提供持续刺激的质量提出质疑。此外,这项试点研究的结果为可能影响运动皮层反应的因素(如情绪、任务控制、饮食等)提供了见解,并为改善长期使用的脑机接口的教学设计提供了有希望的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
期刊最新文献
What makes an app authentic? Determining antecedents of perceived authenticity in an AI-powered service app The effects of self-explanation on game-based learning: Evidence from eye-tracking analyses Avatars at risk: Exploring public response to sexual violence in immersive digital spaces Perception of non-binary social media users towards authentic non-binary social media influencers Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1