Does it matter when the wind blows? Differential impacts of wind generation on the PJM wholesale electricity market

Q1 Social Sciences Electricity Journal Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tej.2023.107303
Bolarinwa A. Ajanaku , Alan R. Collins
{"title":"Does it matter when the wind blows? Differential impacts of wind generation on the PJM wholesale electricity market","authors":"Bolarinwa A. Ajanaku ,&nbsp;Alan R. Collins","doi":"10.1016/j.tej.2023.107303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As wind power continues to gain traction as a sustainable energy source, important questions arise as to how and when increasing penetration of wind power undermines its own revenues as well as revenues from other generating technologies in the wholesale electricity market. To answer this question, we analyzed data from the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland (PJM) market (with relatively low, approximately 3% wind penetration) from 2016 to 2019 using quantile regression methods that provide a comprehensive picture of market conditions. Our findings demonstrate that the merit order effect exists for wind power supply expansion with unit revenue declines across all quantiles and generators. These declines occur consistently throughout market conditions but at different magnitudes. Each additional GWh of wind power is associated with a fall in wind revenue ranging from $0.01/MWh to $0.08/MWh. Wind power's cross-cannibalization effect also reduces gas and baseload capacity revenues across all quantiles, ranging from $0.02/MWh to $0.06/MWh per additional GWh of wind power. Interestingly, our results also reveal positive impacts of wind power supply on value factors (a measure of the energy's worth to the market) at low price market conditions, but negative impacts at high price conditions of the 95% and 99% quantiles. These findings confirm differential impacts of wind power across market conditions – more wind increases its worth at low market values but decreases its worth at high market values. Although the observed effects are exceedingly small, the findings of negative and unequal impacts on unit revenue in this research provide some insights and possible policy recommendations for energy market analysts, wind developers, and energy policymakers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35642,"journal":{"name":"Electricity Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electricity Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040619023000702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As wind power continues to gain traction as a sustainable energy source, important questions arise as to how and when increasing penetration of wind power undermines its own revenues as well as revenues from other generating technologies in the wholesale electricity market. To answer this question, we analyzed data from the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland (PJM) market (with relatively low, approximately 3% wind penetration) from 2016 to 2019 using quantile regression methods that provide a comprehensive picture of market conditions. Our findings demonstrate that the merit order effect exists for wind power supply expansion with unit revenue declines across all quantiles and generators. These declines occur consistently throughout market conditions but at different magnitudes. Each additional GWh of wind power is associated with a fall in wind revenue ranging from $0.01/MWh to $0.08/MWh. Wind power's cross-cannibalization effect also reduces gas and baseload capacity revenues across all quantiles, ranging from $0.02/MWh to $0.06/MWh per additional GWh of wind power. Interestingly, our results also reveal positive impacts of wind power supply on value factors (a measure of the energy's worth to the market) at low price market conditions, but negative impacts at high price conditions of the 95% and 99% quantiles. These findings confirm differential impacts of wind power across market conditions – more wind increases its worth at low market values but decreases its worth at high market values. Although the observed effects are exceedingly small, the findings of negative and unequal impacts on unit revenue in this research provide some insights and possible policy recommendations for energy market analysts, wind developers, and energy policymakers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
刮风有关系吗?风力发电对PJM批发电力市场的不同影响
随着风电作为一种可持续能源的吸引力不断增强,风电渗透率的增加如何以及何时会损害其自身收入以及批发电力市场中其他发电技术的收入,这一重要问题也随之出现。为了回答这个问题,我们使用分位数回归方法分析了2016年至2019年宾夕法尼亚州-新泽西州-马里兰州(PJM)市场(风力穿透率相对较低,约为3%)的数据,该方法提供了市场状况的全面图面。我们的研究结果表明,随着所有分位数和发电机的单位收入下降,风电供应扩张存在优序效应。这些下跌在整个市场条件下持续发生,但幅度不同。风电每增加一个GWh,风电收入就会下降0.01美元/MWh至0.08美元/MWh。风电的交叉蚕食效应也会降低所有分位数的天然气和基本负荷容量收入,从每增加一GWh 0.02美元/MWh到0.06美元/MWh不等。有趣的是,我们的研究结果还揭示了在低价市场条件下,风电供应对价值因素(衡量能源对市场价值的指标)的积极影响,但在95%和99%分位数的高价条件下,会产生负面影响。这些发现证实了风电在不同市场条件下的不同影响——更多的风电在低市场价值下增值,但在高市场价值下贬值。尽管观察到的影响非常小,但本研究中对单位收入的负面和不平等影响的发现为能源市场分析师、风电开发商和能源政策制定者提供了一些见解和可能的政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Electricity Journal
Electricity Journal Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: The Electricity Journal is the leading journal in electric power policy. The journal deals primarily with fuel diversity and the energy mix needed for optimal energy market performance, and therefore covers the full spectrum of energy, from coal, nuclear, natural gas and oil, to renewable energy sources including hydro, solar, geothermal and wind power. Recently, the journal has been publishing in emerging areas including energy storage, microgrid strategies, dynamic pricing, cyber security, climate change, cap and trade, distributed generation, net metering, transmission and generation market dynamics. The Electricity Journal aims to bring together the most thoughtful and influential thinkers globally from across industry, practitioners, government, policymakers and academia. The Editorial Advisory Board is comprised of electric industry thought leaders who have served as regulators, consultants, litigators, and market advocates. Their collective experience helps ensure that the most relevant and thought-provoking issues are presented to our readers, and helps navigate the emerging shape and design of the electricity/energy industry.
期刊最新文献
Critical infrastructure organisational resilience assessment: A case study of Malawi’s power grid operator The role of political parties in the public perception of nuclear energy The political economy of electricity market coupling: Comparing experiences from Europe and the United States Residential electricity efficiency and implications for Vietnam's clean energy transition With uncertainty comes opportunity: Repurposing coal assets to create new beginnings in the U.S.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1