Voice matters: Social categorization and stereotyping of speakers based on sexual orientation and nationality categories

IF 1.3 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Language & Communication Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.langcom.2023.02.001
Fabio Fasoli , Marko Dragojevic , Tamara Rakić , Susie Johnson
{"title":"Voice matters: Social categorization and stereotyping of speakers based on sexual orientation and nationality categories","authors":"Fabio Fasoli ,&nbsp;Marko Dragojevic ,&nbsp;Tamara Rakić ,&nbsp;Susie Johnson","doi":"10.1016/j.langcom.2023.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research examined how listeners categorize and stereotype speakers belonging to intersecting social categories (nationality; sexual orientation) based on voice alone. In Study 1, British heterosexuals categorized the nationality and sexual orientation of British and Italian speakers who self-identified as gay or heterosexual. Participants correctly categorized British speakers as co-nationals and Italian speakers as foreigners. Categorization accuracy of gay speakers’ sexual orientation was poor. Italian gay speakers were perceived as most likely to be gay and non-native speakers. Study 2 examined stereotyping of speakers who sounded either native or foreign, and sounded either gay or heterosexual. Foreign-accented (vs. native-accented) speakers were rated as less competent, and gay-sounding (vs. heterosexual-sounding) speakers as less gender typical. Foreign-accented gay speakers were perceived as the least competent and gender typical.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47575,"journal":{"name":"Language & Communication","volume":"90 ","pages":"Pages 114-128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language & Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027153092300006X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research examined how listeners categorize and stereotype speakers belonging to intersecting social categories (nationality; sexual orientation) based on voice alone. In Study 1, British heterosexuals categorized the nationality and sexual orientation of British and Italian speakers who self-identified as gay or heterosexual. Participants correctly categorized British speakers as co-nationals and Italian speakers as foreigners. Categorization accuracy of gay speakers’ sexual orientation was poor. Italian gay speakers were perceived as most likely to be gay and non-native speakers. Study 2 examined stereotyping of speakers who sounded either native or foreign, and sounded either gay or heterosexual. Foreign-accented (vs. native-accented) speakers were rated as less competent, and gay-sounding (vs. heterosexual-sounding) speakers as less gender typical. Foreign-accented gay speakers were perceived as the least competent and gender typical.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
声音问题:基于性取向和国籍类别对发言者的社会分类和陈规定型观念
这项研究考察了听众如何仅根据声音对属于交叉社会类别(国籍、性取向)的演讲者进行分类和刻板印象。在研究1中,英国异性恋者对自称同性恋或异性恋的英国人和意大利语使用者的国籍和性取向进行了分类。参与者正确地将讲英国语的人归类为共同国民,将讲意大利语的人分类为外国人。同性恋者性取向的分类准确率很低。说意大利同性恋的人被认为最有可能是同性恋和非母语人士。研究2考察了对母语或外语、同性恋或异性恋者的刻板印象。外国口音(与本土口音相比)的说话者被评为能力较差,而同性恋发音(与异性恋发音)的说话者则被评为性别不典型。操外国口音的同性恋者被认为是能力最差、性别最典型的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: This journal is unique in that it provides a forum devoted to the interdisciplinary study of language and communication. The investigation of language and its communicational functions is treated as a concern shared in common by those working in applied linguistics, child development, cultural studies, discourse analysis, intellectual history, legal studies, language evolution, linguistic anthropology, linguistics, philosophy, the politics of language, pragmatics, psychology, rhetoric, semiotics, and sociolinguistics. The journal invites contributions which explore the implications of current research for establishing common theoretical frameworks within which findings from different areas of study may be accommodated and interrelated. By focusing attention on the many ways in which language is integrated with other forms of communicational activity and interactional behaviour, it is intended to encourage approaches to the study of language and communication which are not restricted by existing disciplinary boundaries.
期刊最新文献
Hidden behind the text: A linguistic ethnographic study of stancetaking in news production Chinese thanking interaction from premodern to modern China: A diachronic analysis Human affiliative responses to companion animal vocalizations Editorial Board Ways of participating in a colleague's project: Radio use as collaborative activity in UN military observer training
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1