Event justice and social entity justice: A cross-lagged analysis

Audrey Babic , Laurence Marzucco , Marie Bodarwé , Marie Bourguignon , Julie Laurent , Céline Leclercq
{"title":"Event justice and social entity justice: A cross-lagged analysis","authors":"Audrey Babic ,&nbsp;Laurence Marzucco ,&nbsp;Marie Bodarwé ,&nbsp;Marie Bourguignon ,&nbsp;Julie Laurent ,&nbsp;Céline Leclercq","doi":"10.1016/j.erap.2022.100796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The life of organizations is punctuated by a wide range of managerial decisions (e.g., hiring and selection procedure, performance appraisal, new working methods). Facing such events, employees evaluate the fairness of the situation experienced (event justice). They can also examine the fairness demonstrated by a specific entity, such as the organization or the supervisor (social entity justice). So far, little is known about how justice judgments about events vs. entities are related to each other, especially in a context of organizational change.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Building on decision-making and organizational justice literature, we investigate the directionality of the causal relationships between event justice and social entity justice within a context of organizational change in a Belgian company (a significant reorganization at the level of the organization chart resulting in different changes for employees).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used two samples (team leaders and executives) and realized a cross-lagged panel analysis with two measurement times.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study shows that, in both samples, employees’ fairness perceptions about their organization (social entity justice) influence their interpretation of the fairness of subsequent events involving the organization (event justice).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Building and fostering a climate of justice is therefore of primary importance to organizations, since global fairness perceptions about the organization may help employees to perceive a specific event, such as an organizational change, as being fair.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46883,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","volume":"73 2","pages":"Article 100796"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1162908822000470","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction

The life of organizations is punctuated by a wide range of managerial decisions (e.g., hiring and selection procedure, performance appraisal, new working methods). Facing such events, employees evaluate the fairness of the situation experienced (event justice). They can also examine the fairness demonstrated by a specific entity, such as the organization or the supervisor (social entity justice). So far, little is known about how justice judgments about events vs. entities are related to each other, especially in a context of organizational change.

Objective

Building on decision-making and organizational justice literature, we investigate the directionality of the causal relationships between event justice and social entity justice within a context of organizational change in a Belgian company (a significant reorganization at the level of the organization chart resulting in different changes for employees).

Methods

We used two samples (team leaders and executives) and realized a cross-lagged panel analysis with two measurement times.

Results

The study shows that, in both samples, employees’ fairness perceptions about their organization (social entity justice) influence their interpretation of the fairness of subsequent events involving the organization (event justice).

Conclusion

Building and fostering a climate of justice is therefore of primary importance to organizations, since global fairness perceptions about the organization may help employees to perceive a specific event, such as an organizational change, as being fair.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
事件正义与社会实体正义:交叉滞后分析
引言组织的一生中不时会有各种各样的管理决策(例如,招聘和选拔程序、绩效评估、新的工作方法)。面对此类事件,员工会评估所经历情况的公平性(事件公正性)。他们还可以审查特定实体所表现出的公平性,例如组织或主管(社会实体正义)。到目前为止,人们对事件与实体的公正判断如何相互关联知之甚少,尤其是在组织变革的背景下。目的在决策和组织公正文献的基础上,我们研究了比利时一家公司在组织变革(组织结构图层面的重大重组导致员工发生不同变化)的背景下,事件正义和社会实体正义之间因果关系的方向性测量时间。结果研究表明,在这两个样本中,员工对组织的公平认知(社会实体公平)影响了他们对涉及组织的后续事件公平性的解释(事件公平),因为对组织的全局公平感知可能有助于员工将特定事件(如组织变革)感知为公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The aim of the Revue européenne de Psychologie appliquée / European Review of Applied Psychology is to promote high-quality applications of psychology to all areas of specialization, and to foster exchange among researchers and professionals. Its policy is to attract a wide range of contributions, including empirical research, overviews of target issues, case studies, descriptions of instruments for research and diagnosis, and theoretical work related to applied psychology. In all cases, authors will refer to published and verificable facts, whether established in the study being reported or in earlier publications.
期刊最新文献
Relationship status-mental health concerns association: An examination of attachment and attention Trait authenticity as an “enzyme” for personal resources and work engagement: A study among teachers within the framework of the job demands-resources model Guilt-proneness and self-management behaviour: The moderating role of sense of belonging Justice sensitivity's impact on strike outcomes in Germany and France Role of human resource practices and job crafting in fostering innovative work behavior: An interaction and resource reinvestment perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1