Learning agendas: Motivation, engagement, and potential

Q2 Social Sciences New Directions for Evaluation Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1002/ev.20495
K. Newcomer, K. Olejniczak, Nicholas R. Hart
{"title":"Learning agendas: Motivation, engagement, and potential","authors":"K. Newcomer, K. Olejniczak, Nicholas R. Hart","doi":"10.1002/ev.20495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2017, the U.S. Commission on Evidence‐Based Policymaking recommended that federal agencies produce strategic plans focused on research and evaluation, referred to as learning agendas. This requirement was later incorporated into the Foundations for Evidence‐Based Policymaking Act of 2018 (Evidence Act) for the 24 largest federal agencies. Prior to the Evidence Act, only a few federal agencies had experimented with learning agendas, a relatively new concept in the evaluation literature. Learning agendas hold potential for supporting organizational strategic planning that focuses on the generation of relevant knowledge for decision‐makers, organizational leaders, and stakeholders. An inclusively‐ and strategically‐developed learning agenda provides a list of important questions as well as plans for addressing the questions, balancing the interests, informational needs, and time horizons for different organizational decision‐makers. We draw upon the policy design and the evaluation capacity building literature, our analysis of existing learning agendas, and interviews with federal evaluation leaders who guided their development to describe how the process of developing a learning agenda can support intentional learning and impactful evaluation practice within public agencies. Our work should contribute to the development of both theory and practice regarding the implementation of the new expectation to produce learning agendas in federal agencies that contribute to the increased use of evaluation and evidence in policymaking.","PeriodicalId":35250,"journal":{"name":"New Directions for Evaluation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Directions for Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In 2017, the U.S. Commission on Evidence‐Based Policymaking recommended that federal agencies produce strategic plans focused on research and evaluation, referred to as learning agendas. This requirement was later incorporated into the Foundations for Evidence‐Based Policymaking Act of 2018 (Evidence Act) for the 24 largest federal agencies. Prior to the Evidence Act, only a few federal agencies had experimented with learning agendas, a relatively new concept in the evaluation literature. Learning agendas hold potential for supporting organizational strategic planning that focuses on the generation of relevant knowledge for decision‐makers, organizational leaders, and stakeholders. An inclusively‐ and strategically‐developed learning agenda provides a list of important questions as well as plans for addressing the questions, balancing the interests, informational needs, and time horizons for different organizational decision‐makers. We draw upon the policy design and the evaluation capacity building literature, our analysis of existing learning agendas, and interviews with federal evaluation leaders who guided their development to describe how the process of developing a learning agenda can support intentional learning and impactful evaluation practice within public agencies. Our work should contribute to the development of both theory and practice regarding the implementation of the new expectation to produce learning agendas in federal agencies that contribute to the increased use of evaluation and evidence in policymaking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习议程:动机、参与和潜力
2017年,美国循证政策制定委员会建议联邦机构制定以研究和评估为重点的战略计划,即学习议程。这一要求后来被纳入24个最大的联邦机构的《2018年循证决策基础法案》(简称《循证法案》)。在《证据法》之前,只有少数联邦机构尝试过学习议程,这是评估文献中一个相对较新的概念。学习议程具有支持组织战略规划的潜力,其重点是为决策者、组织领导者和利益相关者提供相关知识。一个包容性和战略性发展的学习议程提供了一个重要问题的列表,以及解决问题的计划,平衡不同组织决策者的利益,信息需求和时间范围。我们利用政策设计和评估能力建设文献,对现有学习议程的分析,以及对指导其发展的联邦评估领导者的访谈,来描述制定学习议程的过程如何支持公共机构内的有意学习和有效评估实践。我们的工作应该有助于理论和实践的发展,以实现新的期望,在联邦机构中制定学习议程,有助于在政策制定中更多地使用评估和证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Directions for Evaluation
New Directions for Evaluation Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Bridging foresight and evaluation: A bridge worth building Guest editors’ notes La sazón de liderazgo among Latine evaluators to advance LatCREE Culturally responsive evaluation designs with Latine immigrants: Lessons learned during COVID‐19 Queered approach for Latinx LGBTQ+ culturally responsive evaluation practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1