Constraining the carbonate system in soils via testing the internal consistency of pH, pCO2 and alkalinity measurements

IF 0.9 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Geochemical Transactions Pub Date : 2020-03-30 DOI:10.1186/s12932-020-00069-5
Sima Bargrizan, Ronald J. Smernik, Luke M. Mosley
{"title":"Constraining the carbonate system in soils via testing the internal consistency of pH, pCO2 and alkalinity measurements","authors":"Sima Bargrizan,&nbsp;Ronald J. Smernik,&nbsp;Luke M. Mosley","doi":"10.1186/s12932-020-00069-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Inorganic carbon exists in various dissolved, gaseous and solid phase forms in natural waters and soils. It is important to accurately measure and model these forms to understand system responses to global climate change. The carbonate system can, in theory, be fully constrained and modelled by measuring at least two out of the following four parameters: partial pressure (pCO<sub>2</sub>), total alkalinity (TA), pH and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) but this has not been demonstrated in soils. In this study, this “internal consistency” of the soil carbonate system was examined by predicting pH of soil extracts from laboratory measurement of TA through alkalinity titration for solutions in which pCO<sub>2</sub> was fixed through equilibrating the soil solution with air with a known pCO<sub>2</sub>. This predicted pH (pH<sub>CO2</sub>) was compared with pH measured on the same soil extracts using spectrophotometric and glass electrode methods (pH<sub>spec and</sub> pH<sub>elec</sub>). Discrepancy between measured and calculated pH was within 0.00–0.1 pH unit for most samples. However, more deviation was observed for those sample with low alkalinity (≤?0.5?meq L<sup>?1</sup>). This is likely attributable to an effect of dissolved organic matter, which can contribute alkalinity not considered in the thermodynamic carbonate model calculations; further research is required to resolve this problem. The effects of increasing soil pCO<sub>2</sub> was modelled to illustrate how internally consistent models can be used to predict risks of pH declines and carbonate mineral dissolution in some soils.</p>","PeriodicalId":12694,"journal":{"name":"Geochemical Transactions","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12932-020-00069-5","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochemical Transactions","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12932-020-00069-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Inorganic carbon exists in various dissolved, gaseous and solid phase forms in natural waters and soils. It is important to accurately measure and model these forms to understand system responses to global climate change. The carbonate system can, in theory, be fully constrained and modelled by measuring at least two out of the following four parameters: partial pressure (pCO2), total alkalinity (TA), pH and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) but this has not been demonstrated in soils. In this study, this “internal consistency” of the soil carbonate system was examined by predicting pH of soil extracts from laboratory measurement of TA through alkalinity titration for solutions in which pCO2 was fixed through equilibrating the soil solution with air with a known pCO2. This predicted pH (pHCO2) was compared with pH measured on the same soil extracts using spectrophotometric and glass electrode methods (pHspec and pHelec). Discrepancy between measured and calculated pH was within 0.00–0.1 pH unit for most samples. However, more deviation was observed for those sample with low alkalinity (≤?0.5?meq L?1). This is likely attributable to an effect of dissolved organic matter, which can contribute alkalinity not considered in the thermodynamic carbonate model calculations; further research is required to resolve this problem. The effects of increasing soil pCO2 was modelled to illustrate how internally consistent models can be used to predict risks of pH declines and carbonate mineral dissolution in some soils.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过测试pH值、二氧化碳分压和碱度测量的内部一致性来限制土壤中的碳酸盐系统
无机碳以各种溶解、气相和固相形式存在于天然水和土壤中。准确测量和模拟这些形式对于了解系统对全球气候变化的反应非常重要。理论上,碳酸盐体系可以通过测量以下四个参数中的至少两个来完全约束和建模:分压(pCO2)、总碱度(TA)、pH和溶解无机碳(DIC),但这还没有在土壤中得到证实。在这项研究中,土壤碳酸盐系统的这种“内部一致性”是通过预测土壤提取物的pH值来检验的,通过碱度滴定来预测实验室测量TA的土壤提取物,通过平衡土壤溶液与已知pCO2的空气来固定pCO2。将预测的pH值(pHCO2)与分光光度法和玻璃电极法(pHspec和pHelec)在相同土壤提取物上测得的pH值进行比较。对于大多数样品,测量值与计算值之间的差异在0.00-0.1 pH单位内。然而,对于低碱度(≤0.5?)的样品,观察到更多的偏差。微地震L ? 1)。这可能是由于溶解有机物的影响,它可以贡献在热力学碳酸盐模型计算中未考虑的碱度;要解决这个问题还需要进一步的研究。对土壤二氧化碳分压增加的影响进行了建模,以说明如何使用内部一致的模型来预测某些土壤中pH值下降和碳酸盐矿物溶解的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geochemical Transactions
Geochemical Transactions 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
2
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geochemical Transactions publishes high-quality research in all areas of chemistry as it relates to materials and processes occurring in terrestrial and extraterrestrial systems.
期刊最新文献
Silicate coprecipitation reduces green rust crystal size and limits dissolution-precipitation during air oxidation Development of the Arabian-Nubian Shield along the Marsa Alam-Idfu transect, Central-Eastern Desert, Egypt: geochemical implementation of zircon U-Pb geochronology Probing atomic-scale processes at the ferrihydrite-water interface with reactive molecular dynamics Water quality assessment of Upper Ganga and Yamuna river systems during COVID-19 pandemic-induced lockdown: imprints of river rejuvenation Effect of Mn2+ concentration on the growth of δ-MnO2 crystals under acidic conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1